Marital Status in the Lower Brule, Lyman County, South Dakota (Unorganized Territory)

Marital Status#1

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Lyman County and the Lower Brule
Female Male
Lyman County
Lower Brule
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
40%20%0%20%40%FMNever MarriedMarriedSeparated/DivorcedWidowed-48.565574%-29.080542%-48.565574%49%48.565574%9.692139%29.080542%7.099380%58.257713%58%237321-26.134301%-3.168977%-48.174707%-1.219449%-29.303279%29%26.134301%48.174707%26.134301%26%143144-13.611615%-0.732647%-10.762651%-14.344262%14%13.611615%10.762651%1.101755%13.611615%14%7075-1.996370%-5.790515%-3.780965%-6.981687%-7.786885%8%1.996370%3.780965%1.996370%2%3811
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

Detailed Marital Status#2

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Lyman County and the Lower Brule
Female Male
Lyman County
Lower Brule
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
40%20%0%20%40%FMNever MarriedNow MarriedSeparatedAbsent SpouseWidowedDivorced-48.565574%-29.080542%-48.565574%49%48.565574%9.692139%29.080542%7.099380%58.257713%58%237321-22.540984%-46.805737%-0.022489%-22.540984%23%22.540984%1.778436%46.805737%24.319419%24%110134-1.229508%-1.140413%-1.229508%1%1.229508%0.585374%1.140413%0.228557%1.814882%2%610-1.814882%-4.947413%-1.368970%-1.196960%-6.762295%7%1.814882%1.368970%1.814882%2%3310-1.996370%-5.790515%-3.780965%-6.981687%-7.786885%8%1.996370%3.780965%1.996370%2%3811-11.796733%-1.318021%-9.622238%-13.114754%13%11.796733%9.622238%0.873199%11.796733%12%6465
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

The Married by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Lyman County and the Lower Brule
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 170.000%0%58.333%58.3%68.571%68.6%53.125%53.1%50.000%50.0%67.647%67.6%36.957%37.0%71.053%71.1%32.432%32.4%33.333%33.3%50.000%50.0%52.941%52.9%32.143%32.1%41.667%41.7%30.612%30.6%30.769%30.8%30.357%30.4%6.667%6.67%20.930%20.9%3.125%3.13%13.095%13.1%5.634%5.63%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of married females in age cohort
M percentage of married males in age cohort

The Divorced1 by Sex and Age#5

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Lyman County and the Lower Brule
Female
Male
0%10%20%30%40%FM75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1718.182%18.2%8.333%8.33%8.571%8.57%25.000%25.0%16.667%16.7%17.647%17.6%28.261%28.3%5.263%5.26%43.243%43.2%30.769%30.8%27.273%27.3%23.529%23.5%10.714%10.7%22.222%22.2%16.327%16.3%23.077%23.1%5.357%5.36%17.778%17.8%4.651%4.65%6.250%6.25%4.762%4.76%5.634%5.63%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of divorced females in age cohort
M percentage of divorced males in age cohort
1and Separated

The Never Married by Sex and Age#6

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Lyman County and the Lower Brule
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1718.182%18.2%0.000%0%0.000%0%12.500%12.5%0.000%0%14.706%14.7%19.565%19.6%23.684%23.7%16.216%16.2%25.641%25.6%22.727%22.7%23.529%23.5%57.143%57.1%36.111%36.1%53.061%53.1%46.154%46.2%64.286%64.3%75.556%75.6%74.419%74.4%90.625%90.6%82.143%82.1%88.732%88.7%100.000%100%100.000%100%100.000%100%100.000%100%
F percentage of never married females in age cohort
M percentage of never married males in age cohort

The Widowed by Sex and Age#7

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Lyman County and the Lower Brule
Female
Male
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%FM75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1763.636%63.6%33.333%33.3%22.857%22.9%9.375%9.38%33.333%33.3%0.000%0%15.217%15.2%0.000%0%8.108%8.11%10.256%10.3%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of widowed females in age cohort
M percentage of widowed males in age cohort

The Married by Age#8

Percentage of age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the county subdivisions in Lyman County.
Scope: population of Lyman County and the Lower Brule
Lower Brule
Lyman County
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%Count85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 17074141442520243920111500
Count number of married in age cohort in the Lower Brule

Marital Status by Race#9

Percentage of each ethno-racial group.
Scope: population of Lyman County and the Lower Brule
Lower Brule
Lyman County
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Married
Never Married
50%0%50%100%CountBlack2White1Mixed2Other2-0.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%-0.000000%-0.000000%100.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%-0.000000%100.000000%100.000000%100%2-25.882353%-12.941176%-18.310627%-0.980926%-8.719346%-38.823529%39%52.941176%-0.000000%8.235294%62.888283%9.100817%61.176471%61%85-36.363636%-27.272727%-61.971831%-4.225352%0.000000%-4.225352%-63.636364%64%36.363636%-0.000000%0.000000%29.577465%36.363636%36%11-56.535600%-1.700319%-12.221041%-56.075697%-1.593625%-13.247012%-70.456961%70%25.079702%4.463337%24.900398%4.183267%29.543039%30%941
Count number of people of given race
1non-Hispanic 2including Hispanic

Map of Marital Status by Tract in the Lower Brule

Married Marital Status by Tract#10

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
27%34%41%47%54%61%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Tract#11

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
9.8%10.7%11.5%12.4%13.2%14.1%

Widowed Marital Status by Tract#12

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
4.7%5.5%6.2%6.9%7.7%8.5%

Never Married Marital Status by Tract#13

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
21%28%34%41%47%54%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Block Group in the Lower Brule

Married Marital Status by Block Group#14

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
27%34%42%49%56%64%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Block Group#15

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
13.71%13.78%13.84%13.90%13.96%14.03%

Widowed Marital Status by Block Group#16

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
4.7%5.3%5.9%6.5%7.1%7.7%

Never Married Marital Status by Block Group#17

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
15%23%31%39%46%54%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Marital Status by County Subdivision in South Dakota

There are 1,335 county subdivisions in South Dakota. This section compares the Lower Brule to the 50 most populous county subdivisions in South Dakota and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Lower Brule. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 2,278.

Married by County Subdivision#18

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of the Lower Brule, selected other county subdivisions in South Dakota, and entities that contain the Lower Brule
0%20%40%60%Count#Split RockWest YanktonWest CusterMt RushmoreWest HughesWest ButteSpringdaleN LawrenceBig SiouxSW MeadeFort PierreHarrisburgTeaSioux FallsBrandonDell RapidsMilbankLeadBox ElderHartfordSouth DakotaBox ElderCntrl PenningtonWest North CentralHuronWatertownPierreChamberlainMidwestCantonAberdeenMitchellLymanSturgisUnited StatesWinnerMobridgeBelle FourcheYanktonSioux FallsRedfieldMadisonRapid CitySpearfishN Sioux CityHot SpringsNorth DeweyEast ToddBrookingsSissetonEast CorsonLower BruleVermillionE Oglala LakotaWest ToddW Oglala Lakota77.350940%77.350940%77%1,933171.791304%71.791304%72%2,064270.705481%70.705481%71%2,696370.323534%70.323534%70%4,282470.152284%70.152284%70%1,382569.696970%69.696970%70%1,265669.396790%69.396790%69%1,254766.851705%66.851705%67%3,372864.919355%64.919355%65%1,771962.518613%62.518613%63%5,8781062.408964%62.408964%62%1,1141162.368816%62.368816%62%2,0801262.309160%62.309160%62%1,9591361.451665%61.451665%61%11,32811.3k1460.791937%60.791937%61%4,2221559.340659%59.340659%59%1,6741657.237083%57.237083%57%1,5621756.387147%56.387147%56%1,4391854.671053%54.671053%55%2,4931953.647276%53.647276%54%1,1622051.975162%51.975162%52%350,626351k51.897655%51.897655%52%1,2172151.802817%51.802817%52%5,5172251.461869%51.461869%51%8,666,3128.67M50.572995%50.572995%51%5,0752350.410142%50.410142%50%8,7882450.075068%50.075068%50%5,6702550.024691%50.024691%50%1,0132649.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M49.317595%49.317595%49%1,3372748.801577%48.801577%49%10,89310.9k2848.766167%48.766167%49%6,1462948.757235%48.757235%49%1,43248.064036%48.064036%48%2,5823048.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M46.904557%46.904557%47%1,0913146.820809%46.820809%47%1,3773246.218118%46.218118%46%2,1023346.142310%46.142310%46%5,5383446.121341%46.121341%46%52,49952.5k3546.104784%46.104784%46%1,0123645.866107%45.866107%46%2,6243745.776689%45.776689%46%26,53426.5k3845.110849%45.110849%45%4,2123941.344383%41.344383%41%8984040.135179%40.135179%40%1,2474137.109538%37.109538%37%8914236.576846%36.576846%37%7334336.396187%36.396187%36%7,2174431.253047%31.253047%31%6414531.000000%31.000000%31%5274627.622714%27.622714%28%28727.079571%27.079571%27%2,5494725.660176%25.660176%26%9624822.739245%22.739245%23%7774917.932312%17.932312%18%1,06550
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in the Midwest

There are 19,478 county subdivisions in the Midwest. This section compares the Lower Brule to the 50 most populous county subdivisions in the Midwest and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Lower Brule. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 112,821.

Married by County Subdivision#22

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of the Lower Brule, selected other county subdivisions in the Midwest, and entities that contain the Lower Brule
0%20%40%Count#OlatheWheelingMiltonDowners GrvLisleSchaumburgPalatineOverland ParkMaineYork TownshipSterling HtsBloomingdaleSouth DakotaWest North CentralMidwestLymanUnited StatesWichitaCedar RapidsWorthSioux FallsLincolnAuroraOmahaTopekaLawrenceWarrenRockfordProvisoCapitalBlue TownshipKansas CityFargoNWashingtonSt. PaulMadisonWayneSpringfieldColumbusGrand RapidsChicagoToledoAkronAnn ArborMinneapolisThorntonKaw TownshipMilwaukeeSt. LouisDaytonCincinnatiLower BruleCtrClevelandDetroit58.380892%58.380892%58%58,51458.5k157.956243%57.956243%58%72,95373.0k257.271563%57.271563%57%54,54254.5k356.170501%56.170501%56%67,91867.9k455.549745%55.549745%56%54,17154.2k554.826990%54.826990%55%59,00759.0k654.654332%54.654332%55%50,33550.3k754.645675%54.645675%55%81,04581.0k853.714534%53.714534%54%60,61960.6k953.415502%53.415502%53%54,82354.8k1052.718032%52.718032%53%58,09058.1k1152.421321%52.421321%52%48,17148.2k1251.975162%51.975162%52%350,626351k51.461869%51.461869%51%8,666,3128.67M49.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.757235%48.757235%49%1,43248.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M46.960737%46.960737%47%142,222142k1346.926723%46.926723%47%49,10649.1k1446.598037%46.598037%47%57,57757.6k1546.121341%46.121341%46%52,49952.5k1645.744744%45.744744%46%100,713101k1744.628467%44.628467%45%50,12050.1k1844.590793%44.590793%45%155,967156k1943.918641%43.918641%44%44,89144.9k2043.888029%43.888029%44%41,97142.0k2143.342243%43.342243%43%47,67347.7k2242.182191%42.182191%42%58,84558.8k2341.858338%41.858338%42%51,24851.2k2441.656465%41.656465%42%39,47239.5k2541.615253%41.615253%42%52,20852.2k2641.257350%41.257350%41%46,87046.9k2740.918685%40.918685%41%39,35639.4k2840.434316%40.434316%40%50,44150.4k2939.298759%39.298759%39%44,32944.3k3038.434697%38.434697%38%89,54989.5k3138.016793%38.016793%38%79,77979.8k3237.374581%37.374581%37%40,26740.3k3336.861011%36.861011%37%51,51451.5k3436.213799%36.213799%36%238,985239k3536.138338%36.138338%36%55,67455.7k3634.991275%34.991275%35%774,654775k3734.263033%34.263033%34%77,25877.3k3834.246812%34.246812%34%55,61155.6k3934.182653%34.182653%34%35,72635.7k4034.058799%34.058799%34%114,098114k4133.122335%33.122335%33%45,05345.1k4232.858158%32.858158%33%47,62147.6k4330.116551%30.116551%30%140,104140k4428.610312%28.610312%29%74,84274.8k4528.095242%28.095242%28%32,24832.2k4627.737366%27.737366%28%66,88266.9k4727.622714%27.622714%28%28727.497098%27.497098%27%32,92232.9k4825.309060%25.309060%25%79,70079.7k4922.633004%22.633004%23%122,402122k50
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in the United States

There are 35,600 county subdivisions in the United States. This section compares the Lower Brule to the 50 most populous county subdivisions in the United States and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Lower Brule. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 547,300.

Married by County Subdivision#26

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of the Lower Brule, selected other county subdivisions in the United States, and entities that contain the Lower Brule
0%20%40%Count#PlanoSeattle EastNW HarrisNE TarrantSan JoseSouth DakotaWest North CentralSalt Lk CityHempsteadOceanside-EscondidoOceanside-Escond…MidwestLymanUnited StatesAnaheim-Santa Ana-Gdn GrvAnaheim-Santa An…TulsaOntarioE San Gabriel VlySan DiegoFort WorthNE DallasQueensSan Fernando VlyHoustonEl PasoSW DallasTucsonPhoenixSacramentoLas VegasSeattleAlbuquerque1, CharlotteFresnoSan BernardinoBrooklynLong Bch-LakewoodSan FranciscoDenverTampaAustinSan Antonio CntrlOrlandoColumbusMiamiLos AngelesChicagoManhattanBronxAtlantaMilwaukeePhiladelphiaBostonWashingtonLower BruleBaltimoreDetroit58.202134%58.202134%58%251,641252k157.638027%57.638027%58%274,040274k256.514896%56.514896%57%320,995321k355.470608%55.470608%55%245,818246k453.145912%53.145912%53%753,465753k551.975162%51.975162%52%350,626351k51.461869%51.461869%51%8,666,3128.67M51.138382%51.138382%51%386,329386k650.950813%50.950813%51%320,555321k750.269233%50.269233%50%265,786266k849.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.757235%48.757235%49%1,43248.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.984846%47.984846%48%650,127650k947.622706%47.622706%48%221,908222k1047.598208%47.598208%48%244,720245k1146.424729%46.424729%46%362,066362k1245.848486%45.848486%46%891,599892k1345.482613%45.482613%45%296,986297k1445.455274%45.455274%45%550,082550k1545.377673%45.377673%45%868,275868k1645.160186%45.160186%45%683,144683k1744.927436%44.927436%45%1,148,7951.15M1844.541106%44.541106%45%191,435191k1944.216416%44.216416%44%323,524324k2044.045122%44.045122%44%316,266316k2143.656525%43.656525%44%1,102,9451.10M2243.293835%43.293835%43%387,327387k2343.059598%43.059598%43%644,442644k2442.998477%42.998477%43%380,073380k2542.927370%42.927370%43%222,587223k2642.506557%42.506557%43%272,436272k2742.409166%42.409166%42%223,593224k2842.178253%42.178253%42%269,042269k2940.197400%40.197400%40%840,930841k3039.817865%39.817865%40%184,950185k3139.306154%39.306154%39%295,734296k3239.068367%39.068367%39%212,453212k3338.872581%38.872581%39%212,275212k3438.860704%38.860704%39%271,470271k3537.253059%37.253059%37%203,734204k3636.755584%36.755584%37%174,510175k3736.213799%36.213799%36%238,985239k3835.677552%35.677552%36%287,144287k3935.326059%35.326059%35%750,299750k4034.991275%34.991275%35%774,654775k4133.355074%33.355074%33%477,149477k4231.190048%31.190048%31%352,504353k4330.518762%30.518762%31%147,022147k4430.116551%30.116551%30%140,104140k4529.523746%29.523746%30%374,491374k4629.130336%29.130336%29%165,206165k4728.183356%28.183356%28%157,791158k4827.622714%27.622714%28%28726.884245%26.884245%27%136,972137k4922.633004%22.633004%23%122,402122k50
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Definitions

This page reports on the marital status of the residents of the Lower Brule aged 15 and older. The following definitions are used in this page:

  • Never Married: a person over the age of 15 that has never been married
  • Married: married and not separated at the time of the survey, including cases where one spouse is absent for reasons other than a separation
  • Separated: including legal and de-facto separations for reasons of marital discord
  • Divorced: and not remarried at the time of the survey
  • Widowed: and not remarried at the time of the survey

These definition were taken directly from the US Census Bureau, and reflect the marital status at the time of the survey.

For additional information about the data presented on this site, including our sources, please see the About Page.

More Topics to Explore

Demographics

Income

Education

More Maps to Explore

State:
South Dakota
County:
Lyman
Unincorporated Place:
Lower Brule
ZIP Codes:
57532, 57544, 57548, 57569
Unified School Districts:
Chamberlain 07-1, Lyman 42-1
Congressional District:
SD-At Large
State Senate District:
SD-26
State House District:
SD-26B
Neighboring Townships:
Oacoma, Pleasant, West Point
Neighboring Unorganized Territories:
Central Lyman, Crow Creek, Crow Creek, Crow Creek, East Lyman, Lower Brule, South Stanley, West Lyman
Nearby Townships:
Bailey, Raber, Rex, Rose
Nearby Unorganized Territories:
Gassman, North Hughes