Employment Status in the Smith District 7, Smith County, Tennessee (District)

Employment Status#1

Percentage of population aged 25 to 64 years old.
Scope: population of Smith County and the Smith District 7
Smith District 7
Smith County
0%10%20%30%40%50%CountArmed ForcesEmployed1UnemployedOther20.000000%0.000000%0.0%0.013221%054.773083%54.743174%54.773083%54.8%1,0501.304121%2.419515%1.304121%1.3%2543.922796%42.824089%43.922796%43.9%842
Count population with given employment status
1excluding armed forces 2not in the labor force

Employment Status By Sex#2

Percentage of male and female population aged 25 to 64 years old.
Scope: population of Smith County and the Smith District 7
Smith District 7
Smith County
40%20%0%20%40%FMArmed ForcesEmployed1UnemployedOther2-0.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%0.0%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.0%00-50.247770%-50.247770%-50.247770%50.2%50.247770%9.553992%50.247770%9.553992%59.801762%59.8%507543-1.101322%-0.385299%-1.101322%-0.385299%-1.486620%1.5%1.101322%1.101322%1.101322%1.1%1510-39.096916%-9.168693%-39.096916%-9.168693%-48.265610%48.3%39.096916%39.096916%39.096916%39.1%487355
F females with given employment status
M males with given employment status
1excluding armed forces 2not in the labor force

Employment Status by Age#3

Employment status composition of the given age cohorts.
Scope: population of the Smith District 7
Armed Forces
Employed
Unemployed
Not in Labor Force
75+70-7465-6962-6460-6155-5945-5435-4430-3425-2922-2420-2116-190.000000%0.000000%0.000000%100.000000%100%00.000000%12.500000%13%0.000000%87.500000%88%140.000000%52.941176%53%0.000000%47.058824%47%720.000000%69.444444%69%0.000000%30.555556%31%500.000000%49.180328%49%0.000000%50.819672%51%300.000000%65.399240%65%0.000000%34.600760%35%1720.000000%69.767442%70%0.000000%30.232558%30%1800.000000%68.243243%68%0.000000%31.756757%32%2020.000000%83.695652%84%2.173913%14.130435%14%1540.000000%69.387755%69%17.346939%17%13.265306%13%680.000000%83.333333%83%0.000000%16.666667%17%800.000000%9.302326%9%0.000000%90.697674%91%40.000000%16.901408%17%2.816901%80.281690%80%240%20%40%60%80%100%Count
Count number of people in age cohort

Employment by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of population employed by sex and age cohort.
Scope: population of the Smith District 7
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM75+70-7465-6962-6460-6155-5945-5435-4430-3425-2922-2420-2116-190.000%0%0.000%0%10.909%10.9%14.035%14.0%47.222%47.2%59.375%59.4%61.404%61.4%100.000%100%16.667%16.7%52.727%52.7%78.986%79.0%50.400%50.4%61.538%61.5%78.125%78.1%44.516%44.5%94.326%94.3%92.308%92.3%72.500%72.5%74.510%74.5%63.830%63.8%61.905%61.9%100.000%100%9.302%9.30%0.000%0%14.516%14.5%18.750%18.8%
F employed females as percentage of age cohort
M employed males as percentage of age cohort

Employment Sex Ratio by Age#5

Percentage more males or females employed by age cohort.
Scope: population of Smith County and the Smith District 7
More Females More Males
Smith County
Smith District 7
1,000%500%0%500%1,000%M:FFM70-7465-6962-6460-6155-5945-5435-4430-3425-2922-2420-2116-1933.333333%505.263158%33.333333%33.3%1.3331.3368-12.080537%11.764706%11.764706%11.8%1.1181.123438-133.333333%-133.333333%133.3%51.937984%0.4290.4335151,000.000000%77.647059%1,000.000000%> 1000%29.00029.0129-73.015873%-73.015873%73.0%17.250000%0.5780.581096325.000000%34.482759%25.000000%25.0%1.2501.258010092.753623%17.572693%92.753623%92.8%1.9281.9369133-65.517241%-65.517241%65.5%4.960836%0.6040.609658-26.666667%-26.666667%26.7%5.764411%0.7890.793830107.692308%44.318182%107.692308%107.7%2.0772.082654-1,000.000000%-1,000.000000%> 1000%18.620690%0.000040-38.297872%66.666667%66.666667%66.7%1.6671.67915
M:F ratio of males to females in the age cohort
F employed females in the age cohort
M employed males in the age cohort

Male Employment by Age#6

Percentage of male population employed by age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the county subdivisions in Smith County.
Scope: population of Smith County, the Smith District 7, and selected other county subdivisions in Smith Counties
Smith District 7
Smith County
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%20%40%60%80%100%%75+70-7465-6962-6460-6155-5945-5435-4430-3425-2922-2420-2116-190.000%0%14.035%14.0%59.375%59.4%100.000%100%52.727%52.7%50.400%50.4%78.125%78.1%94.326%94.3%72.500%72.5%63.830%63.8%100.000%100%0.000%0%18.750%18.8%
% employed percentage of male population in the Smith District 7

Female Employment by Age#7

Percentage of female population employed by age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the county subdivisions in Smith County.
Scope: population of Smith County, the Smith District 7, and selected other county subdivisions in Smith Counties
Smith District 7
Smith County
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%20%40%60%80%100%%75+70-7465-6962-6460-6155-5945-5435-4430-3425-2922-2420-2116-190.000%0%10.909%10.9%47.222%47.2%61.404%61.4%16.667%16.7%78.986%79.0%61.538%61.5%44.516%44.5%92.308%92.3%74.510%74.5%61.905%61.9%9.302%9.30%14.516%14.5%
% employed percentage of female population in the Smith District 7

Employment among the Married#8

Selected family employment structures as a percentage of all married couple households.
Scope: households in Smith County and the Smith District 7
Smith District 7
Smith County
0%5%10%15%20%25%CountBoth Parents Work1Stay at Home Moms1Stay at Home Dads1Neither Parent WorksNeither Parent Wo…1Both Work, No Kids2Ladies Who Lunch2Gents Who Lunch2Neither Works, No KidsNeither Works, No …219.736842%21.520190%19.736842%19.7%10515.413534%12.019002%15.413534%15.4%821.691729%2.304038%1.691729%1.7%90.000000%0.000000%0.0%1.472684%027.631579%26.318290%27.631579%27.6%14710.714286%13.776722%10.714286%10.7%5713.345865%5.344418%13.345865%13.3%7111.466165%17.244656%11.466165%11.5%61
1children under 18 present in the house 2no children under 18 present in the house

Employment among the Married With Children#9

Selected employment arrangements as a percentage of married couples with children under 18 present in the house.
Scope: households in Smith County and the Smith District 7
Smith District 7
Smith County
0%10%20%30%40%50%CountBoth WorkStay at Home MomsStay at Home DadsNeither Work53.571429%57.670274%53.571429%53.6%10541.836735%32.208784%41.836735%41.8%824.591837%6.174411%4.591837%4.6%90.000000%0.000000%0.0%3.946531%0

Employment among the Married Without Children#10

Selected employment arrangements as a percentage of married couples without children under 18 present in the house.
Scope: households in Smith County and the Smith District 7
Smith District 7
Smith County
0%10%20%30%40%CountBoth WorkLadies Who LunchGents Who LunchNeither Work43.750000%41.985601%43.750000%43.8%14716.964286%21.978022%16.964286%17.0%5721.130952%8.525957%21.130952%21.1%7118.154762%27.510421%18.154762%18.2%61

Employment by Educational Attainment#11

Percentage of population that is employed by highest level of educational attainment among the population aged 25 to 64 years old.
Scope: population of Smith County and the Smith District 7
Smith District 7
Smith County
0%20%40%60%80%CountBachelor's Degree1Some College2H.S. Diploma3No H.S. Diploma387.671233%80.630631%87.671233%87.7%6479.735683%73.417266%79.735683%79.7%36267.353952%68.269626%67.353952%67.4%39230.894309%38.555079%30.894309%30.9%38
Count employed people with given educational attainment aged 25 to 64 years old
1or higher 2two or four year institution 3H.S. = High School

The Non-Working by Race#12

Percentage of each ethno-racial group's population 16 to 64 years of age that is either unemployed or not in the labor force.
Scope: population of Smith County and the Smith District 7
Female Male
Smith County
Smith District 7
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
100%50%0%50%100%%MixedOtherWhiteBlackHispanic1Asian-0.000000%-46.969697%-1.748252%0.000000%0.0%0.000000%100.000000%46.969697%100.000000%100.0%28.571%28.6%-0.000000%-100.000000%-37.931034%-100.000000%100.0%0.000000%37.931034%30.900134%0.000000%0.0%52.000%52.0%-31.104651%-10.460801%-28.085774%-13.957482%-41.565452%41.6%31.104651%28.085774%31.104651%31.1%36.529%36.5%-0.000000%-34.306569%0.000000%0.0%0.000000%47.619048%34.306569%28.984570%47.619048%47.6%27.778%27.8%-0.000000%-63.157895%0.000000%0.0%0.000000%0.000000%63.157895%10.755149%0.000000%0.0%0.000%0%-0.000000%-0.000000%-100.000000%0.000000%0.0%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.0%0.000%0%
% percentage of both sexes combined
1white Hispanic

Unemployment by Race#13

Percentage unemployed of each ethno-racial group's population 16 to 64 years of age.
Scope: population of Smith County and the Smith District 7
Female Male
Smith County
Smith District 7
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
10%5%0%5%10%%WhiteHispanic1BlackAsianMixedOther-1.453488%-0.570803%-1.970014%-1.863290%-2.024291%2.0%1.453488%1.970014%1.453488%1.5%1.749%1.75%-0.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%0.0%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.0%0.000%0%-0.000000%-1.265823%-1.653885%0.000000%0.0%0.000000%0.000000%1.265823%0.000000%0.0%0.000%0%-0.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%0.0%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.0%0.000%0%-0.000000%-10.606061%-3.496503%0.000000%0.0%0.000000%0.000000%10.606061%0.000000%0.0%0.000%0%-0.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%0.0%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.0%0.000%0%
% percentage of both sexes combined
1white Hispanic

Armed Forces by Race#14

Percentage of each ethno-racial group's population 16 to 64 years of age in the armed forces.
Scope: population of Smith County and the Smith District 7
Female Male
Smith County
Smith District 7
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
0.0%0.2%0.4%0.6%0.8%1.0%1.2%%WhiteHispanic1BlackAsianMixedOther-0.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%0.00%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.00%0.000%0%-0.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%0.00%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.00%0.000%0%-0.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%0.00%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%1.265823%0.000000%0.00%0.000%0%-0.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%0.00%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.00%0.000%0%-0.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%0.00%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.00%0.000%0%-0.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%0.00%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.00%0.000%0%
% percentage of both sexes combined
1white Hispanic

Employment by Race#15

Percentage employed of each ethno-racial group's population 16 to 64 years of age.
Scope: population of Smith County and the Smith District 7
Female Male
Smith County
Smith District 7
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
100%50%0%50%100%%BlackWhiteHispanic1MixedOtherAsian-52.380952%-47.619048%-36.708861%-28.984570%-100.000000%100.0%52.380952%36.708861%52.380952%52.4%72.222%72.2%-58.434548%-57.956743%-58.434548%58.4%58.434548%10.460801%57.956743%13.957482%68.895349%68.9%63.471%63.5%-0.000000%-100.000000%-26.086957%-10.755149%-100.000000%100.0%0.000000%26.086957%0.000000%0.0%100.000%100%-0.000000%-100.000000%-51.282051%-100.000000%100.0%0.000000%51.282051%1.748252%0.000000%0.0%71.429%71.4%-0.000000%-31.168831%-30.900134%0.000000%0.0%0.000000%100.000000%31.168831%100.000000%100.0%48.000%48.0%-0.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%0.0%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.000000%0.0%0.000%0%
% percentage of both sexes combined
1white Hispanic

Map of Employment Status by Tract in the Smith District 7

Both Parents Work Employment Status by Tract#16

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which both parents work outside the home (%):
17.1%18.2%19.2%20.1%21.1%22.2%

Stay at Home Moms Employment Status by Tract#17

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which the husband works outside the home and the wife stays at home (%):
5.8%7.5%9.1%10.8%12.4%14.1%

Stay at Home Dads Employment Status by Tract#18

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which the wife works outside the home and the husband stays at home (%):
1.95%2.27%2.58%2.88%3.19%3.51%

Neither Parent Works Employment Status by Tract#19

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which neither parent works outside the home (%):
1.27%1.50%1.72%1.94%2.17%2.40%

Employed Working-Age Men Employment Status by Tract#20

Percentage of male population aged 35 to 44 years old that are employed
63%69%75%81%87%93%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Employment Status by County Subdivision in the Nashville Area

There are 186 county subdivisions in the Nashville Area. This section compares the Smith District 7 to the 50 most populous county subdivisions in the Nashville Area and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Smith District 7. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 15,773.

Employed Working-Age Men by County Subdivision#25

Percentage of male population aged 35 to 44 years old that are employed.
Scope: population of the Smith District 7, selected other county subdivisions in the Nashville Area, and entities that contain the Smith District 7
0%20%40%60%80%Count#Williamson District 55Davidson District 3232Williamson District 1010Williamson District 33Davidson District 2323Williamson District 99Williamson District 22Rutherford District 77Williamson District 66Williamson District 44Williamson District 88Davidson District 2727Williamson District 1212Williamson District 11Davidson District 3333Davidson District 2525Davidson District 3131Smith District 77Davidson District 3434Williamson District 77Davidson District 1515Rutherford District 2020Davidson District 2424Davidson District 3535Sumner District 77Davidson District 1212Sumner District 66Davidson District 1818Davidson District 1616Davidson District 1414Davidson District 44Davidson District 2222Davidson District 1010Nashville, Davidson, Murfreesboro, and Franklin Metro AreaNashvilleDavidson District 66Davidson District 1717Davidson District 2929Davidson District 99Davidson District 77Davidson District 3030Davidson District 2828Davidson District 1111Davidson District 2626Davidson District 88United States of AmericaUnited StatesSmith CountySmithSmith County School DistrictSmith CountySouthTennesseeDavidson District 11East South CentralDavidson District 33Davidson District 55Davidson District 2121Davidson District 22Davidson District 1313Davidson District 2020Davidson District 191998.990536%98.990536%99.0%1,569197.462514%97.462514%97.5%1,690297.284717%97.284717%97.3%1,254396.678967%96.678967%96.7%1,572496.641791%96.641791%96.6%1,036596.405229%96.405229%96.4%1,180696.339286%96.339286%96.3%1,079795.587076%95.587076%95.6%1,213895.571302%95.571302%95.6%1,079995.460894%95.460894%95.5%1,3671095.232274%95.232274%95.2%7791195.200629%95.200629%95.2%1,2101295.080501%95.080501%95.1%1,0631395.076097%95.076097%95.1%1,0621494.746487%94.746487%94.7%1,5511594.597458%94.597458%94.6%8931694.481236%94.481236%94.5%1,7121794.326241%94.326241%94.3%13394.194603%94.194603%94.2%1,1521894.150418%94.150418%94.2%1,0141993.544304%93.544304%93.5%1,4782093.130779%93.130779%93.1%1,4102192.413793%92.413793%92.4%9382292.161017%92.161017%92.2%1,3052392.087415%92.087415%92.1%1,2222491.773432%91.773432%91.8%1,3612591.228070%91.228070%91.2%8842690.342052%90.342052%90.3%8982790.048251%90.048251%90.0%1,4932889.217134%89.217134%89.2%1,2082988.596491%88.596491%88.6%1,1113088.297014%88.297014%88.3%1,0943187.973274%87.973274%88.0%7903287.846962%87.846962%87.8%107,732108k87.365591%87.365591%87.4%1,3003386.497890%86.497890%86.5%8203486.176471%86.176471%86.2%1,4653585.966461%85.966461%86.0%9743685.855728%85.855728%85.9%1,2143785.336538%85.336538%85.3%1,4203884.692180%84.692180%84.7%1,5273984.357188%84.357188%84.4%1,3324084.330299%84.330299%84.3%1,2974184.064885%84.064885%84.1%8814283.826751%83.826751%83.8%16,918,49516.9M83.633094%83.633094%83.6%93083.633094%83.633094%83.6%93082.890666%82.890666%82.9%6,325,3956.33M81.898889%81.898889%81.9%340,131340k79.737130%79.737130%79.7%7284379.481008%79.481008%79.5%932,530933k75.062762%75.062762%75.1%8974474.384686%74.384686%74.4%8164573.640167%73.640167%73.6%5284671.294559%71.294559%71.3%7604770.392954%70.392954%70.4%1,0394870.270270%70.270270%70.3%1,1964969.265639%69.265639%69.3%76450
Count number of employed 35 to 44 year old men
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage employed 35 to 44 year old men

Employment Status by County Subdivision in Tennessee

There are 844 county subdivisions in Tennessee. This section compares the Smith District 7 to the 50 most populous county subdivisions in Tennessee and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Smith District 7. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 19,215.

Employed Working-Age Men by County Subdivision#30

Percentage of male population aged 35 to 44 years old that are employed.
Scope: population of the Smith District 7, selected other county subdivisions in Tennessee, and entities that contain the Smith District 7
0%20%40%60%80%Count#Davidson District 3232Davidson District 2727Davidson District 3333Davidson District 3131Smith District 77Davidson District 1515Knox District 55Shelby District 22Knox District 77Davidson District 1212Hamilton District 33Knox District 44Hamilton District 22Shelby District 33Hamilton District 11Shelby District 11Hamilton District 77Knox District 33Knox District 66Davidson District 44Davidson District 2222Shelby District 1010Nashville, Davidson, Murfreesboro, and Franklin Metro AreaNashvilleHamilton District 99Shelby District 44Davidson District 2929Davidson District 99Knox District 22Davidson District 77Shelby District 1313Davidson District 2828Davidson District 1111Davidson District 2626Knox District 88United States of AmericaUnited StatesSmith CountySmithSmith County School DistrictSmith CountyKnox District 99SouthBlount District 44Hamilton District 66TennesseeShelby District 66Sullivan District 66Hamilton District 55East South CentralSullivan District 22Hamilton District 88Shelby District 77Shelby District 55Shelby District 1212Knox District 11Shelby District 99Sullivan District 44Hamilton District 44Davidson District 1313Shelby District 88Shelby District 111197.462514%97.462514%97.5%1,690195.200629%95.200629%95.2%1,210294.746487%94.746487%94.7%1,551394.481236%94.481236%94.5%1,712494.326241%94.326241%94.3%13393.544304%93.544304%93.5%1,478593.312815%93.312815%93.3%3,335692.916748%92.916748%92.9%4,788792.018927%92.018927%92.0%2,917891.773432%91.773432%91.8%1,361991.072125%91.072125%91.1%2,3361091.067731%91.067731%91.1%3,0791191.016449%91.016449%91.0%2,1581290.821861%90.821861%90.8%4,3541390.182536%90.182536%90.2%1,8281490.176951%90.176951%90.2%3,9751589.806044%89.806044%89.8%1,9911689.071466%89.071466%89.1%3,4151788.827945%88.827945%88.8%3,0771888.596491%88.596491%88.6%1,1111988.297014%88.297014%88.3%1,0942088.077797%88.077797%88.1%3,4872187.846962%87.846962%87.8%107,732108k87.539733%87.539733%87.5%2,7542286.704412%86.704412%86.7%4,4412386.176471%86.176471%86.2%1,4652485.966461%85.966461%86.0%9742585.872139%85.872139%85.9%2,1762685.855728%85.855728%85.9%1,2142784.955752%84.955752%85.0%4,3202884.692180%84.692180%84.7%1,5272984.357188%84.357188%84.4%1,3323084.330299%84.330299%84.3%1,2973183.939974%83.939974%83.9%2,6293283.826751%83.826751%83.8%16,918,49516.9M83.633094%83.633094%83.6%93083.633094%83.633094%83.6%93083.407276%83.407276%83.4%1,8803382.890666%82.890666%82.9%6,325,3956.33M82.526316%82.526316%82.5%1,1763482.517483%82.517483%82.5%2,0063581.898889%81.898889%81.9%340,131340k81.005134%81.005134%81.0%2,9983679.950495%79.950495%80.0%9693779.707576%79.707576%79.7%1,7993879.481008%79.481008%79.5%932,530933k77.135171%77.135171%77.1%1,1473976.598050%76.598050%76.6%2,1214076.371215%76.371215%76.4%3,4814176.185958%76.185958%76.2%4,0154274.074074%74.074074%74.1%2,7204373.224680%73.224680%73.2%1,8874472.646906%72.646906%72.6%2,7944571.913836%71.913836%71.9%8684671.740161%71.740161%71.7%1,5134770.392954%70.392954%70.4%1,0394866.168800%66.168800%66.2%2,7914961.796442%61.796442%61.8%2,11950
Count number of employed 35 to 44 year old men
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage employed 35 to 44 year old men

Employment Status by County Subdivision in the South

There are 8,483 county subdivisions in the South. This section compares the Smith District 7 to the 50 most populous county subdivisions in the South and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Smith District 7. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 245,874.

Employed Working-Age Men by County Subdivision#35

Percentage of male population aged 35 to 44 years old that are employed.
Scope: population of the Smith District 7, selected other county subdivisions in the South, and entities that contain the Smith District 7
0%20%40%60%80%Count#Smith District 77Lewisville-Flower MoundLewisville-Flower …PlanoMontgomery District 1313Northeast TarrantNE TarrantSan Antonio NorthSan Antonio NNorthwest HarrisNW HarrisRound Rock-GeorgetownRound Rock-Geor…Southeast MontgomerySE MontgomeryRoswell-AlpharettaNaplesAustinArlingtonVirginia BeachVirginia BchTownship 1:Charlotte1, CharlotteNortheast DallasNE DallasSan Antonio NorthwestSan Antonio NWNashville, Davidson, Murfreesboro, and Franklin Metro AreaNashvilleHoustonMiramar-Pembroke PinesMiramar-Pembrok…Jacksonville EastJacksonville EMcAllen-PharrSugar LandLubbockBoynton Beach-Delray BeachBoynton Bch-Delra…TulsaFort WorthPlantationCorpus ChristiSan Antonio NortheastSan Antonio NEGreenvilleSouthwest DallasSW DallasHialeahBradentonWashingtonTampaFort LauderdaleOrlandoKendale Lakes-TamiamiKendale Lks-Tami…United States of AmericaUnited StatesSmith CountySmithSmith County School DistrictSmith CountyEl PasoSouthOklahoma City SouthwestOklahoma City SWClearwaterSt. PetersburgTennesseeMiamiLakelandAtlantaSan Antonio CentralSan Antonio CntrlEast South CentralBirminghamAtlanta-DecaturNew OrleansJacksonville WestJacksonville WBaltimore94.326241%94.326241%94.3%13393.412658%93.412658%93.4%18,44918.4k193.125861%93.125861%93.1%38,54238.5k293.062808%93.062808%93.1%18,71418.7k392.587844%92.587844%92.6%37,54937.5k492.056750%92.056750%92.1%21,02321.0k591.358362%91.358362%91.4%50,22750.2k691.248334%91.248334%91.2%20,54020.5k790.789119%90.789119%90.8%23,59723.6k890.763277%90.763277%90.8%19,46619.5k990.438499%90.438499%90.4%11,42611.4k1090.234987%90.234987%90.2%62,20862.2k1189.233109%89.233109%89.2%31,68431.7k1288.943370%88.943370%88.9%25,75825.8k1388.885729%88.885729%88.9%53,13553.1k1488.524499%88.524499%88.5%95,88095.9k1588.019304%88.019304%88.0%17,69117.7k1687.846962%87.846962%87.8%107,732108k87.620894%87.620894%87.6%208,826209k1787.590194%87.590194%87.6%18,33018.3k1887.541741%87.541741%87.5%24,64324.6k1987.004782%87.004782%87.0%14,73614.7k2086.926744%86.926744%86.9%15,86515.9k2186.740073%86.740073%86.7%12,99813.0k2286.711832%86.711832%86.7%14,59114.6k2386.642310%86.642310%86.6%32,49032.5k2486.152627%86.152627%86.2%47,84447.8k2586.120154%86.120154%86.1%14,55014.6k2685.977488%85.977488%86.0%16,19316.2k2785.502227%85.502227%85.5%13,82413.8k2885.485696%85.485696%85.5%15,86715.9k2985.460025%85.460025%85.5%57,28357.3k3085.204452%85.204452%85.2%22,27522.3k3185.005646%85.005646%85.0%10,53910.5k3284.835284%84.835284%84.8%39,14339.1k3384.549061%84.549061%84.5%36,87136.9k3484.277224%84.277224%84.3%17,15817.2k3583.906583%83.906583%83.9%34,27534.3k3683.903106%83.903106%83.9%21,47521.5k3783.826751%83.826751%83.8%16,918,49516.9M83.633094%83.633094%83.6%93083.633094%83.633094%83.6%93083.435482%83.435482%83.4%25,45725.5k3882.890666%82.890666%82.9%6,325,3956.33M82.843258%82.843258%82.8%23,52523.5k3982.753261%82.753261%82.8%14,90814.9k4082.672917%82.672917%82.7%18,69418.7k4181.898889%81.898889%81.9%340,131340k81.570097%81.570097%81.6%57,48057.5k4281.375817%81.375817%81.4%12,20812.2k4379.983871%79.983871%80.0%33,72233.7k4479.851538%79.851538%79.9%34,63834.6k4579.481008%79.481008%79.5%932,530933k79.075618%79.075618%79.1%21,06121.1k4678.601186%78.601186%78.6%19,62219.6k4777.043346%77.043346%77.0%18,18318.2k4874.177175%74.177175%74.2%13,88313.9k4974.017917%74.017917%74.0%26,60526.6k50
Count number of employed 35 to 44 year old men
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage employed 35 to 44 year old men