Marital Status in the Nahma Township, Delta County, Michigan (Township)

Marital Status#1

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Delta County and the Nahma Township
Female Male
Delta County
Nahma Township
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedMarriedSeparated/DivorcedWidowed-16.814159%-20.506198%-16.814159%17%16.814159%3.468860%20.506198%7.573245%20.283019%20%3843-61.061947%-53.131457%-61.061947%61%61.061947%3.088996%53.131457%1.288765%64.150943%64%138136-10.176991%-14.069814%-0.573781%-10.176991%10%10.176991%1.143764%14.069814%11.320755%11%2324-4.245283%-7.701620%-3.430520%-8.288230%-11.946903%12%4.245283%3.430520%4.245283%4%279
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

Detailed Marital Status#2

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Delta County and the Nahma Township
Female Male
Delta County
Nahma Township
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedNow MarriedSeparatedAbsent SpouseWidowedDivorced-16.814159%-20.506198%-16.814159%17%16.814159%3.468860%20.506198%7.573245%20.283019%20%3843-61.061947%-51.123450%-61.061947%61%61.061947%3.088996%51.123450%2.066332%64.150943%64%138136-0.000000%-0.968492%0.000000%0%0.000000%2.358491%0.968492%0.542810%2.358491%2%05-0.000000%-1.230440%-0.777566%0.000000%0%0.000000%0.000000%1.230440%0.000000%0%00-4.245283%-7.701620%-3.430520%-8.288230%-11.946903%12%4.245283%3.430520%4.245283%4%279-8.962264%-1.214727%-12.558513%-1.116591%-10.176991%10%8.962264%12.558513%8.962264%9%2319
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

The Married by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Delta County and the Nahma Township
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1751.429%51.4%82.857%82.9%75.000%75.0%64.815%64.8%89.474%89.5%100.000%100%92.308%92.3%77.778%77.8%77.778%77.8%80.000%80.0%58.333%58.3%68.750%68.8%62.500%62.5%100.000%100%83.333%83.3%62.500%62.5%100.000%100%22.222%22.2%100.000%100%22.222%22.2%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of married females in age cohort
M percentage of married males in age cohort

The Divorced1 by Sex and Age#5

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Delta County and the Nahma Township
Female
Male
0%10%20%30%40%50%FM75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 170.000%0%5.714%5.71%12.500%12.5%12.963%13.0%10.526%10.5%0.000%0%7.692%7.69%11.111%11.1%11.111%11.1%20.000%20.0%41.667%41.7%31.250%31.3%37.500%37.5%0.000%0%16.667%16.7%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%50.000%50.0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of divorced females in age cohort
M percentage of divorced males in age cohort
1and Separated

The Never Married by Sex and Age#6

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Delta County and the Nahma Township
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 170.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%16.667%16.7%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%37.500%37.5%0.000%0%77.778%77.8%0.000%0%77.778%77.8%100.000%100%100.000%100%100.000%100%50.000%50.0%100.000%100%100.000%100%
F percentage of never married females in age cohort
M percentage of never married males in age cohort

The Widowed by Sex and Age#7

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Delta County and the Nahma Township
Female
Male
0%10%20%30%40%FM75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1748.571%48.6%11.429%11.4%12.500%12.5%5.556%5.56%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%11.111%11.1%11.111%11.1%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of widowed females in age cohort
M percentage of widowed males in age cohort

The Married by Age#8

Percentage of age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the county subdivisions in Delta County.
Scope: population of Delta County and the Nahma Township
Nahma Township
Delta County
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%20%40%60%80%Count85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 17047774426291881546000
Count number of married in age cohort in the Nahma Township

Marital Status by Race#9

Percentage of each ethno-racial group.
Scope: population of Delta County and the Nahma Township
Nahma Township
Delta County
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Married
Never Married
50%0%50%100%CountMixed2Other2White1-45.066274%-1.472754%-13.843888%-0.000000%100.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%-0.000000%32.400589%7.216495%100.000000%100%2-14.285714%-42.812500%-5.625000%-21.093750%-14.285714%14%85.714286%-0.000000%0.000000%-0.000000%28.593750%1.875000%85.714286%86%14-18.720379%-1.184834%-9.952607%-23.323261%-1.066305%-12.892918%-29.857820%30%61.611374%8.530806%54.999826%7.717690%70.142180%70%422
Count number of people of given race
1non-Hispanic 2including Hispanic

Map of Marital Status by Tract in the Nahma Township

Married Marital Status by Tract#10

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
59.5%60.2%60.9%61.6%62.2%63.0%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Tract#11

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
9.55%10.05%10.53%11.02%11.50%11.99%

Widowed Marital Status by Tract#12

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
6.2%6.9%7.5%8.2%8.8%9.5%

Never Married Marital Status by Tract#13

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
18.0%18.9%19.7%20.6%21.4%22.3%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Block Group in the Nahma Township

Married Marital Status by Block Group#14

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
60.90%60.97%61.04%61.11%61.17%61.25%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Block Group#15

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
10.78%11.10%11.41%11.73%12.04%12.36%

Widowed Marital Status by Block Group#16

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
5.6%6.4%7.1%7.9%8.6%9.4%

Never Married Marital Status by Block Group#17

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
18.64%19.13%19.61%20.09%20.57%21.06%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Marital Status by County Subdivision in the Escanaba Area

There are 17 county subdivisions in the Escanaba Area. This section compares the Nahma Township to all of the county subdivisions in the Escanaba Area and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Nahma Township.

Married by County Subdivision#18

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of the Nahma Township, selected other county subdivisions in the Escanaba Area, and entities that contain the Nahma Township
0%20%40%60%Count#BramptonBay de NocCornellEscanabaBaldwinGdnBark RivBig Bay de NocFord RivWellsNahmaFairbanksEnsignMaple RdgMasonvilleEscanaba AreaDeltaGladstoneMidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganEscanaba73.365042%73.365042%73%617172.438163%72.438163%72%205271.888412%71.888412%72%335366.985476%66.985476%67%1,891466.611018%66.611018%67%399564.877301%64.877301%65%423664.822461%64.822461%65%785763.415867%63.415867%63%1,25563.323944%63.323944%63%1,124863.303685%63.303685%63%2,491962.557078%62.557078%63%2741061.568627%61.568627%62%1571159.491979%59.491979%59%4451254.489164%54.489164%54%3521354.046446%54.046446%54%7681453.764536%53.764536%54%16,36716.4k53.764536%53.764536%54%16,36716.4k49.591002%49.591002%50%1,9401549.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M39.867778%39.867778%40%4,16116
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 16 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in Michigan

There are 1,578 county subdivisions in Michigan. This section compares the Nahma Township to the 50 most populous county subdivisions in Michigan and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Nahma Township. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 36,008.

Married by County Subdivision#22

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of the Nahma Township, selected other county subdivisions in Michigan, and entities that contain the Nahma Township
0%20%40%60%Count#MacombBig Bay de NocBloomfieldGeorgetownNahmaCommerceTroyNoviRochester HlsW BloomfieldCantonShelbyOrionIndependenceGrand BlancHollandLivoniaEscanaba AreaDeltaFarmington HlsPortageChesterfieldSterling HtsMidlandDearbornSaginawMidwestPittsfieldMeridianWaterfordEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganSt. Clair ShrsDearborn HtsWyomingKentwoodRoyal OakWarrenClintonTaylorLincoln ParkBattle CreekRedfordWestlandYpsilantiSouthfieldRosevilleGrand RapidsAnn ArborLansingMuskegonPontiacSaginawFlintKalamazooDetroitEast Lansing64.439903%64.439903%64%42,56942.6k163.415867%63.415867%63%1,25563.095477%63.095477%63%21,97322.0k262.590507%62.590507%63%24,11824.1k362.557078%62.557078%63%27462.091426%62.091426%62%20,87720.9k460.706321%60.706321%61%41,65041.7k559.518156%59.518156%60%27,57027.6k659.300450%59.300450%59%35,29835.3k759.105553%59.105553%59%32,47232.5k859.044340%59.044340%59%41,84041.8k957.631837%57.631837%58%36,43636.4k1057.419551%57.419551%57%16,98717.0k1157.240953%57.240953%57%16,67216.7k1256.735567%56.735567%57%16,71616.7k1356.145924%56.145924%56%16,08316.1k1454.769696%54.769696%55%43,85343.9k1553.764536%53.764536%54%16,36716.4k53.764536%53.764536%54%16,36716.4k53.427083%53.427083%53%36,20736.2k1653.286673%53.286673%53%20,40420.4k1753.017253%53.017253%53%19,02119.0k1852.718032%52.718032%53%58,09058.1k1951.788231%51.788231%52%17,63717.6k2051.453715%51.453715%51%36,95237.0k2151.172164%51.172164%51%17,26617.3k2249.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M49.101991%49.101991%49%15,14615.1k2348.659629%48.659629%49%17,00817.0k2448.600740%48.600740%49%29,41929.4k2548.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M47.889781%47.889781%48%24,15824.2k2646.798876%46.798876%47%20,97921.0k2746.588223%46.588223%47%27,20127.2k2844.718612%44.718612%45%18,26818.3k2943.675306%43.675306%44%22,32922.3k3043.342243%43.342243%43%47,67347.7k3143.138407%43.138407%43%35,97736.0k3240.858683%40.858683%41%20,08020.1k3340.301746%40.301746%40%11,88711.9k3440.006856%40.006856%40%16,34016.3k3539.883002%39.883002%40%15,40815.4k3639.629175%39.629175%40%27,12327.1k3739.243418%39.243418%39%17,23117.2k3837.737511%37.737511%38%23,13823.1k3936.867371%36.867371%37%14,43814.4k4036.138338%36.138338%36%55,67455.7k4134.182653%34.182653%34%35,72635.7k4233.902461%33.902461%34%29,72529.7k4328.685851%28.685851%29%8,8824428.216181%28.216181%28%13,02613.0k4528.093543%28.093543%28%11,05211.1k4625.754990%25.754990%26%19,92219.9k4725.508204%25.508204%26%16,13716.1k4822.633004%22.633004%23%122,402122k4916.051858%16.051858%16%7,04550
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in the Midwest

There are 19,478 county subdivisions in the Midwest. This section compares the Nahma Township to the 50 most populous county subdivisions in the Midwest and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Nahma Township. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 112,821.

Married by County Subdivision#26

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of the Nahma Township, selected other county subdivisions in the Midwest, and entities that contain the Nahma Township
0%20%40%60%Count#Big Bay de NocNahmaOlatheWheelingMiltonDowners GrvLisleSchaumburgPalatineOverland ParkEscanaba AreaDeltaMaineYork TownshipSterling HtsBloomingdaleMidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganWichitaCedar RapidsWorthSioux FallsLincolnAuroraOmahaTopekaLawrenceWarrenRockfordProvisoCapitalBlue TownshipKansas CityFargoNWashingtonSt. PaulMadisonWayneSpringfieldColumbusGrand RapidsChicagoToledoAkronAnn ArborMinneapolisThorntonKaw TownshipMilwaukeeSt. LouisDaytonCincinnatiCtrClevelandDetroit63.415867%63.415867%63%1,25562.557078%62.557078%63%27458.380892%58.380892%58%58,51458.5k157.956243%57.956243%58%72,95373.0k257.271563%57.271563%57%54,54254.5k356.170501%56.170501%56%67,91867.9k455.549745%55.549745%56%54,17154.2k554.826990%54.826990%55%59,00759.0k654.654332%54.654332%55%50,33550.3k754.645675%54.645675%55%81,04581.0k853.764536%53.764536%54%16,36716.4k53.764536%53.764536%54%16,36716.4k53.714534%53.714534%54%60,61960.6k953.415502%53.415502%53%54,82354.8k1052.718032%52.718032%53%58,09058.1k1152.421321%52.421321%52%48,17148.2k1249.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M46.960737%46.960737%47%142,222142k1346.926723%46.926723%47%49,10649.1k1446.598037%46.598037%47%57,57757.6k1546.121341%46.121341%46%52,49952.5k1645.744744%45.744744%46%100,713101k1744.628467%44.628467%45%50,12050.1k1844.590793%44.590793%45%155,967156k1943.918641%43.918641%44%44,89144.9k2043.888029%43.888029%44%41,97142.0k2143.342243%43.342243%43%47,67347.7k2242.182191%42.182191%42%58,84558.8k2341.858338%41.858338%42%51,24851.2k2441.656465%41.656465%42%39,47239.5k2541.615253%41.615253%42%52,20852.2k2641.257350%41.257350%41%46,87046.9k2740.918685%40.918685%41%39,35639.4k2840.434316%40.434316%40%50,44150.4k2939.298759%39.298759%39%44,32944.3k3038.434697%38.434697%38%89,54989.5k3138.016793%38.016793%38%79,77979.8k3237.374581%37.374581%37%40,26740.3k3336.861011%36.861011%37%51,51451.5k3436.213799%36.213799%36%238,985239k3536.138338%36.138338%36%55,67455.7k3634.991275%34.991275%35%774,654775k3734.263033%34.263033%34%77,25877.3k3834.246812%34.246812%34%55,61155.6k3934.182653%34.182653%34%35,72635.7k4034.058799%34.058799%34%114,098114k4133.122335%33.122335%33%45,05345.1k4232.858158%32.858158%33%47,62147.6k4330.116551%30.116551%30%140,104140k4428.610312%28.610312%29%74,84274.8k4528.095242%28.095242%28%32,24832.2k4627.737366%27.737366%28%66,88266.9k4727.497098%27.497098%27%32,92232.9k4825.309060%25.309060%25%79,70079.7k4922.633004%22.633004%23%122,402122k50
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in the United States

There are 35,600 county subdivisions in the United States. This section compares the Nahma Township to the 50 most populous county subdivisions in the United States and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Nahma Township. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 547,300.

Married by County Subdivision#30

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of the Nahma Township, selected other county subdivisions in the United States, and entities that contain the Nahma Township
0%20%40%60%Count#Big Bay de NocNahmaPlanoSeattle EastNW HarrisNE TarrantEscanaba AreaDeltaSan JoseSalt Lk CityHempsteadOceanside-EscondidoOceanside-Escond…MidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesAnaheim-Santa Ana-Gdn GrvAnaheim-Santa An…MichiganTulsaOntarioE San Gabriel VlySan DiegoFort WorthNE DallasQueensSan Fernando VlyHoustonEl PasoSW DallasTucsonPhoenixSacramentoLas VegasSeattleAlbuquerque1, CharlotteFresnoSan BernardinoBrooklynLong Bch-LakewoodSan FranciscoDenverTampaAustinSan Antonio CntrlOrlandoColumbusMiamiLos AngelesChicagoManhattanBronxAtlantaMilwaukeePhiladelphiaBostonWashingtonBaltimoreDetroit63.415867%63.415867%63%1,25562.557078%62.557078%63%27458.202134%58.202134%58%251,641252k157.638027%57.638027%58%274,040274k256.514896%56.514896%57%320,995321k355.470608%55.470608%55%245,818246k453.764536%53.764536%54%16,36716.4k53.764536%53.764536%54%16,36716.4k53.145912%53.145912%53%753,465753k551.138382%51.138382%51%386,329386k650.950813%50.950813%51%320,555321k750.269233%50.269233%50%265,786266k849.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.984846%47.984846%48%650,127650k947.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M47.622706%47.622706%48%221,908222k1047.598208%47.598208%48%244,720245k1146.424729%46.424729%46%362,066362k1245.848486%45.848486%46%891,599892k1345.482613%45.482613%45%296,986297k1445.455274%45.455274%45%550,082550k1545.377673%45.377673%45%868,275868k1645.160186%45.160186%45%683,144683k1744.927436%44.927436%45%1,148,7951.15M1844.541106%44.541106%45%191,435191k1944.216416%44.216416%44%323,524324k2044.045122%44.045122%44%316,266316k2143.656525%43.656525%44%1,102,9451.10M2243.293835%43.293835%43%387,327387k2343.059598%43.059598%43%644,442644k2442.998477%42.998477%43%380,073380k2542.927370%42.927370%43%222,587223k2642.506557%42.506557%43%272,436272k2742.409166%42.409166%42%223,593224k2842.178253%42.178253%42%269,042269k2940.197400%40.197400%40%840,930841k3039.817865%39.817865%40%184,950185k3139.306154%39.306154%39%295,734296k3239.068367%39.068367%39%212,453212k3338.872581%38.872581%39%212,275212k3438.860704%38.860704%39%271,470271k3537.253059%37.253059%37%203,734204k3636.755584%36.755584%37%174,510175k3736.213799%36.213799%36%238,985239k3835.677552%35.677552%36%287,144287k3935.326059%35.326059%35%750,299750k4034.991275%34.991275%35%774,654775k4133.355074%33.355074%33%477,149477k4231.190048%31.190048%31%352,504353k4330.518762%30.518762%31%147,022147k4430.116551%30.116551%30%140,104140k4529.523746%29.523746%30%374,491374k4629.130336%29.130336%29%165,206165k4728.183356%28.183356%28%157,791158k4826.884245%26.884245%27%136,972137k4922.633004%22.633004%23%122,402122k50
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Definitions

This page reports on the marital status of the residents of the Nahma Township aged 15 and older. The following definitions are used in this page:

  • Never Married: a person over the age of 15 that has never been married
  • Married: married and not separated at the time of the survey, including cases where one spouse is absent for reasons other than a separation
  • Separated: including legal and de-facto separations for reasons of marital discord
  • Divorced: and not remarried at the time of the survey
  • Widowed: and not remarried at the time of the survey

These definition were taken directly from the US Census Bureau, and reflect the marital status at the time of the survey.

For additional information about the data presented on this site, including our sources, please see the About Page.

More Topics to Explore

Demographics

Income

Education

More Maps to Explore

State:
Michigan
County:
Delta
Metro Area:
Escanaba Area
ZIP Codes:
49864, 49878, 49895
Unified School Districts:
Big Bay de Noc, Rapid River
Congressional District:
MI-1
State Senate District:
MI-38
State House District:
MI-108
Neighboring Townships:
Au Train, Bay de Noc, Ensign, Fairbanks, Garden, Inwood, Masonville, Mathias, Munising
Nearby Townships:
Baldwin, Brampton, Escanaba, Limestone, Maple Ridge, Thompson, Wells