Marital Status in State House District 102, Michigan (State House District)

Marital Status#1

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 102
Female Male
Michigan
State House District 102
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
40%20%0%20%40%FMNever MarriedMarriedSeparated/DivorcedWidowed-28.373886%-29.997089%-28.373886%28%28.373886%7.463893%29.997089%6.060515%35.837779%36%10,15710.2k12,83112.8k-47.825237%-46.631047%-47.825237%48%47.825237%0.114880%46.631047%2.778150%47.940117%48%17,12017.1k17,16417.2k-13.856381%-0.985645%-11.783011%-2.359012%-14.842026%15%13.856381%11.783011%13.856381%14%5,3134,961-2.365724%-6.593128%-2.750188%-6.479654%-8.958851%9%2.365724%2.750188%2.365724%2%3,207847
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

Detailed Marital Status#2

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 102
Female Male
Michigan
State House District 102
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
40%20%0%20%40%FMNever MarriedNow MarriedSeparatedAbsent SpouseWidowedDivorced-28.373886%-29.997089%-28.373886%28%28.373886%7.463893%29.997089%6.060515%35.837779%36%10,15710.2k12,83112.8k-46.353658%-0.200523%-44.935835%-46.554181%47%46.353658%44.935835%2.531926%46.353658%46%16,66516.7k16,59616.6k-1.242913%-0.050492%-1.206320%-0.339268%-1.293404%1%1.242913%1.206320%1.242913%1%463445-1.271056%-1.695212%-1.271056%1%1.271056%0.315403%1.695212%0.246224%1.586459%2%455568-2.365724%-6.593128%-2.750188%-6.479654%-8.958851%9%2.365724%2.750188%2.365724%2%3,207847-12.613468%-0.935153%-10.576690%-2.019743%-13.548621%14%12.613468%10.576690%12.613468%13%4,8504,516
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

The Married by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 102
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1718.431%18.4%57.955%58.0%45.107%45.1%72.838%72.8%63.713%63.7%77.521%77.5%70.626%70.6%70.390%70.4%62.620%62.6%61.298%61.3%63.090%63.1%62.268%62.3%55.997%56.0%59.462%59.5%67.229%67.2%59.965%60.0%60.356%60.4%55.946%55.9%57.116%57.1%47.830%47.8%45.612%45.6%26.628%26.6%9.603%9.60%5.495%5.49%0.667%0.67%1.679%1.68%0.747%0.75%0.480%0.48%
F percentage of married females in age cohort
M percentage of married males in age cohort

The Divorced1 by Sex and Age#5

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 102
Female
Male
0%5%10%15%20%25%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 176.144%6.14%5.682%5.68%6.908%6.91%7.629%7.63%14.349%14.3%13.149%13.1%19.035%19.0%21.234%21.2%24.433%24.4%24.506%24.5%25.404%25.4%24.261%24.3%28.566%28.6%22.615%22.6%21.587%21.6%24.684%24.7%21.107%21.1%17.538%17.5%14.984%15.0%16.102%16.1%8.982%8.98%7.132%7.13%2.886%2.89%0.807%0.81%0.389%0.39%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.240%0.24%
F percentage of divorced females in age cohort
M percentage of divorced males in age cohort
1and Separated

The Never Married by Sex and Age#6

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 102
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 173.308%3.31%3.896%3.90%5.345%5.35%6.511%6.51%3.638%3.64%4.848%4.85%2.876%2.88%6.136%6.14%8.786%8.79%12.187%12.2%7.240%7.24%13.471%13.5%13.776%13.8%17.462%17.5%10.773%10.8%14.828%14.8%18.141%18.1%26.423%26.4%27.337%27.3%36.068%36.1%45.200%45.2%65.853%65.9%87.510%87.5%93.451%93.5%97.442%97.4%98.321%98.3%99.253%99.3%98.679%98.7%
F percentage of never married females in age cohort
M percentage of never married males in age cohort

The Widowed by Sex and Age#7

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 102
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1772.117%72.1%32.468%32.5%42.640%42.6%13.022%13.0%18.299%18.3%4.482%4.48%7.463%7.46%2.241%2.24%4.160%4.16%2.009%2.01%4.266%4.27%0.000%0%1.661%1.66%0.462%0.46%0.411%0.41%0.523%0.52%0.395%0.40%0.093%0.09%0.564%0.56%0.000%0%0.206%0.21%0.388%0.39%0.000%0%0.247%0.25%1.502%1.50%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.600%0.60%
F percentage of widowed females in age cohort
M percentage of widowed males in age cohort

The Married by Age#8

Percentage of age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the lower state legislative districts in Michigan.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 102
State House District 102
Michigan
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%Count85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 175522,5966,2454,1053,8783,7642,9283,0102,4302,3181,7946014320
Count number of married in age cohort in State House District 102

Marital Status by Race#9

Percentage of each ethno-racial group.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 102
State House District 102
Michigan
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Married
Never Married
50%0%50%CountWhite1Asian2Mixed2Other2White HispanicBlack2-30.804229%-1.238533%-13.055890%-28.404956%-1.009921%-11.788890%-45.098651%45%48.986723%5.914626%52.395394%6.400839%54.901349%55%67,25767.3k-54.724409%-1.574803%-0.787402%-31.533651%-0.545272%-3.702842%-57.086614%57%42.716535%0.196850%60.836114%3.382120%42.913386%43%508-41.544118%-3.308824%-12.408088%-54.604964%-1.759718%-10.417404%-57.261029%57%41.636029%1.102941%30.020725%3.197190%42.738971%43%1,088-35.518293%-1.371951%-23.628049%-39.832515%-2.679443%-11.428023%-60.518293%61%36.128049%3.353659%42.539952%3.520068%39.481707%39%656-52.289157%-1.807229%-11.445783%-43.045654%-2.025080%-9.506242%-65.542169%66%31.686747%2.771084%42.359085%3.063938%34.457831%34%830-69.230769%-0.555115%-15.543220%-53.580862%-3.364937%-12.843388%-85.329104%85%13.243458%1.427439%24.149425%6.061389%14.670896%15%1,261
Count number of people of given race
1non-Hispanic 2including Hispanic

Map of Marital Status by County in State House District 102

Married Marital Status by County#10

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
42.7%45.0%47.3%49.5%51.8%54.1%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County#11

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
12.8%13.7%14.6%15.4%16.3%17.2%

Widowed Marital Status by County#12

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
5.26%5.60%5.93%6.26%6.59%6.93%

Never Married Marital Status by County#13

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
24.2%27.2%30.2%33.2%36.2%39.2%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by County Subdivision in State House District 102

Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#14

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
15%26%36%47%57%68%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County Subdivision#15

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
6.1%10.3%14.4%18.6%22.7%26.9%

Widowed Marital Status by County Subdivision#16

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
2.3%4.1%5.9%7.7%9.5%11.4%

Never Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#17

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
14%26%37%47%58%70%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Tract in State House District 102

Married Marital Status by Tract#18

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
0%13%25%37%49%62%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Tract#19

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
0.0%4.4%8.8%13.2%17.6%22.0%

Widowed Marital Status by Tract#20

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
0.0%2.3%4.5%6.8%9.1%11.4%

Never Married Marital Status by Tract#21

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
18%35%51%67%83%100%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Block Group in State House District 102

Married Marital Status by Block Group#22

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
0%15%30%44%58%73%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Block Group#23

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
0%6%12%18%24%31%

Widowed Marital Status by Block Group#24

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
0.0%3.7%7.5%11.2%14.9%18.7%

Never Married Marital Status by Block Group#25

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
13%31%48%65%82%100%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Marital Status by Place in State House District 102

There are 18 places in State House District 102. This section compares all 18 of those to each other, State House District 102, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 102.

Married by Place#26

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State House District 102, selected places in State House District 102, and entities that contain State House District 102
0%20%40%60%80%Count#WedgewoodCanadian LksHarriettaStanwoodTustinBoonBuckleyLe RoyMidwestEast North CentralCadillacUnited StatesMichiganMI-102CaberfaeMesickMorleyMantonMecostaHaringReed CityBarrytonBig Rapids83.333333%83.333333%83%140171.326014%71.326014%71%1,689266.666667%66.666667%67%88358.750000%58.750000%59%94457.500000%57.500000%57%115556.896552%56.896552%57%99655.597723%55.597723%56%293754.044118%54.044118%54%147849.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.346706%48.346706%48%3,977948.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M47.882682%47.882682%48%34,28434.3k47.368421%47.368421%47%91045.783133%45.783133%46%1521139.731286%39.731286%40%2071238.411317%38.411317%38%3531337.129841%37.129841%37%1631430.000000%30.000000%30%1291529.079696%29.079696%29%6131627.913279%27.913279%28%1031715.608829%15.608829%16%1,47818
Count number of this marital status
# rank of place out of 18 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Metro Area in State House District 102

There are 2 metro areas that are fully or partially contained within State House District 102 (1 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 2 of those to each other, State House District 102, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 102.

Married by Metro Area#30

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State House District 102, selected metro areas in State House District 102, and entities that contain State House District 102
0%10%20%30%40%50%Count#Cadillac AreaMidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganMI-102Big Rapids55.120380%55.120380%55%21,22321.2k149.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M47.882682%47.882682%48%34,28434.3k42.716110%42.716110%43%15,62015.6k2
Count number of this marital status
# rank of metro area out of 2 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County in State House District 102

There are 3 counties that are fully or partially contained within State House District 102 (2 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 3 of those to each other, State House District 102, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 102.

Married by County#34

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State House District 102, selected counties in State House District 102, and entities that contain State House District 102
0%10%20%30%40%50%Count#WexfordOsceolaMidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganMI-102Mecosta54.080200%54.080200%54%14,25514.3k150.806151%50.806151%51%9,548249.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M47.882682%47.882682%48%34,28434.3k42.716110%42.716110%43%15,62015.6k3
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county out of 3 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in State House District 102

There are 43 county subdivisions in State House District 102. This section compares all 43 of those to each other, State House District 102, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 102.

Married by County Subdivision#38

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State House District 102, selected county subdivisions in State House District 102, and entities that contain State House District 102
0%20%40%60%Count#Clam LkHendersonCherry GrvColfaxGreenwoodMartinyGrantRose LkColfaxChippewaLincolnCedar CrkAustinSlagleBoon TownshipMortonCedarHartwickLe RoyHanoverBurdellWexfordHintonMecostaSpringvilleLibertyS BranchRichmondSelmaAntiochWheatlandSheridanMillbrookDeerfieldMidwestHaringAetnaEast North CentralCadillacUnited StatesMichiganMI-102GrnFork TownshipBig RapidsMantonReed CityBig Rapids67.426710%67.426710%67%1,242165.306122%65.306122%65%96264.536199%64.536199%65%1,141364.105960%64.105960%64%484464.092664%64.092664%64%332562.588905%62.588905%63%880661.869159%61.869159%62%331761.858664%61.858664%62%639860.365469%60.365469%60%958959.854678%59.854678%60%6591059.747435%59.747435%60%7571159.341446%59.341446%59%8291259.163180%59.163180%59%7071358.717435%58.717435%59%2931458.458961%58.458961%58%3491558.406622%58.406622%58%2,2581657.936508%57.936508%58%2191757.575758%57.575758%58%3041857.301108%57.301108%57%5691957.221711%57.221711%57%6222056.653620%56.653620%57%5792155.829016%55.829016%56%4312255.816555%55.816555%56%4992355.581288%55.581288%56%1,2002455.180180%55.180180%55%7352554.819277%54.819277%55%4552654.666667%54.666667%55%1642754.200743%54.200743%54%7292853.962645%53.962645%54%1,0692953.082707%53.082707%53%3533052.640693%52.640693%53%6083152.045671%52.045671%52%5473251.154734%51.154734%51%4433350.639205%50.639205%51%7133449.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.825257%48.825257%49%1,3303548.759894%48.759894%49%9243648.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.346706%48.346706%48%3,9773748.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M47.882682%47.882682%48%34,28434.3k47.134725%47.134725%47%1,2423846.955860%46.955860%47%6173938.600843%38.600843%39%1,5564038.411317%38.411317%38%3534129.079696%29.079696%29%6134215.608829%15.608829%16%1,47843
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 43 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Lower State Legislative District in Michigan

There are 110 lower state legislative districts in Michigan. This section compares State House District 102 to all of the lower state legislative districts in Michigan and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 102.

Married by Lower State Legislative District#42

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State House District 102, selected other lower state legislative districts in Michigan, and entities that contain State House District 102
0%20%40%60%Count#MI-89MI-73MI-33MI-40MI-52MI-45MI-42MI-87MI-47MI-46MI-41MI-44MI-51MI-36MI-38MI-21MI-80MI-39MI-20MI-86MI-105MI-98MI-84MI-82MI-56MI-106MI-93MI-32MI-81MI-85MI-101MI-61MI-108MI-59MI-104MI-79MidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganMI-102MI-96MI-35MI-76MI-12MI-29MI-5MI-34MI-8MI-6MI-3MI-762.284112%62.284112%62%44,86244.9k162.135786%62.135786%62%48,70748.7k262.087315%62.087315%62%44,57044.6k362.082761%62.082761%62%47,48447.5k461.205201%61.205201%61%44,48744.5k559.463038%59.463038%59%44,00844.0k659.169149%59.169149%59%46,47546.5k759.015101%59.015101%59%44,90444.9k858.944838%58.944838%59%43,16043.2k958.776671%58.776671%59%43,82843.8k1058.415904%58.415904%58%46,10346.1k1158.191422%58.191422%58%45,27745.3k1257.855447%57.855447%58%43,86643.9k1357.794440%57.794440%58%42,70242.7k1457.782104%57.782104%58%44,82144.8k1557.731284%57.731284%58%41,47341.5k1657.729343%57.729343%58%43,22643.2k1757.543661%57.543661%58%44,71244.7k1857.439819%57.439819%57%42,66442.7k1956.907107%56.907107%57%43,96744.0k2056.714689%56.714689%57%43,57943.6k2156.617730%56.617730%57%39,95440.0k2256.066479%56.066479%56%40,21240.2k2355.905068%55.905068%56%40,68140.7k2455.859985%55.859985%56%39,36939.4k2555.776998%55.776998%56%44,33144.3k2655.751544%55.751544%56%43,52343.5k2755.706465%55.706465%56%39,78539.8k2855.623693%55.623693%56%38,82238.8k2955.405861%55.405861%55%41,08441.1k3054.866194%54.866194%55%42,95243.0k3253.973459%53.973459%54%42,46242.5k3853.884291%53.884291%54%38,80138.8k3953.038474%53.038474%53%39,53739.5k4751.183180%51.183180%51%38,41438.4k5549.492190%49.492190%49%34,06334.1k6349.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M47.882682%47.882682%48%34,28434.3k6947.404342%47.404342%47%33,33933.3k7142.589378%42.589378%43%32,62932.6k7842.089575%42.089575%42%33,60633.6k8139.989628%39.989628%40%29,30229.3k8632.937125%32.937125%33%23,52623.5k9428.978939%28.978939%29%17,39217.4k10224.832552%24.832552%25%15,83115.8k10623.867109%23.867109%24%16,24316.2k10723.230473%23.230473%23%17,24717.2k10820.592463%20.592463%21%13,18013.2k10919.742496%19.742496%20%13,50913.5k110
Count number of this marital status
# rank of lower state legislative district out of 110 by percentage of this marital status

Definitions

This page reports on the marital status of the residents of State House District 102 aged 15 and older. The following definitions are used in this page:

  • Never Married: a person over the age of 15 that has never been married
  • Married: married and not separated at the time of the survey, including cases where one spouse is absent for reasons other than a separation
  • Separated: including legal and de-facto separations for reasons of marital discord
  • Divorced: and not remarried at the time of the survey
  • Widowed: and not remarried at the time of the survey

These definition were taken directly from the US Census Bureau, and reflect the marital status at the time of the survey.

For additional information about the data presented on this site, including our sources, please see the About Page.

More Topics to Explore

Demographics

Income

Education

More Maps to Explore

State:
Michigan
Counties:
Mecosta, Osceola, Wexford
Metro Areas:
Big Rapids Area, Cadillac Area
Charter Townships:
Big Rapids, Green, Haring
Cities:
Big Rapids, Cadillac, Manton, Reed City
Townships:
Aetna, Antioch, Austin, Boon, Burdell, Cedar, Cedar Creek, Cherry Grove, Chippewa, Clam Lake, Colfax, Colfax, Deerfield, Fork, Grant, Greenwood, Hanover, Hartwick, Henderson, Hinton, Le Roy, Liberty, Lincoln, Martiny, Mecosta, Millbrook, Morton, Richmond, Rose Lake, Selma, Sheridan, Slagle, South Branch, Springville, Wexford, Wheatland
Unincorporated Places:
Boon, Caberfae, Canadian Lakes, Haring, Wedgewood
Villages:
Barryton, Buckley, Harrietta, Le Roy, Mecosta, Mesick, Morley, Stanwood, Tustin
Congressional District:
MI-4
State Senate Districts:
MI-33, MI-35
Unified School Districts:
Benzie County, Big Rapids, Buckley, Cadillac, Chippewa Hills, Evart, Kingsley, Lakeview, Manton, Marion, McBain, Mesick, Montabella, Morley Stanwood, Pine River, Reed City
ZIP Codes:
48850, 48886, 49305, 49307, 49310, 49320, 49332, 49336, 49337, 49338, 49340, 49342, 49346, 49601, 49618, 49620, 49625, 49631, 49633, 49638, 49639, 49649, 49655, 49663, 49665, 49668, 49677, 49679, 49688, 49689
Neighboring State House Districts:
MI-70, MI-97, MI-99, MI-100, MI-101, MI-103, MI-104
Nearby State House Districts:
MI-73, MI-74, MI-91