Marital Status in State Senate District 28, South Dakota (State Senate District)

Marital Status#1

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of South Dakota and State Senate District 28
Female Male
South Dakota
State Senate District 28
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedMarriedSeparated/DivorcedWidowed-28.858124%-26.470963%-28.858124%29%28.858124%7.738409%26.470963%7.517920%36.596533%37%2,6893,357-45.900408%-51.743084%-45.900408%46%45.900408%0.474824%51.743084%0.463844%46.375232%46%4,2774,254-13.419819%-0.950217%-11.226328%-0.983418%-14.370036%14%13.419819%11.226328%13.419819%13%1,3391,231-3.608416%-7.263016%-2.577860%-6.998347%-10.871432%11%3.608416%2.577860%3.608416%4%1,013331
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

Detailed Marital Status#2

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of South Dakota and State Senate District 28
Female Male
South Dakota
State Senate District 28
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
40%20%0%20%40%FMNever MarriedNow MarriedSeparatedAbsent SpouseWidowedDivorced-28.858124%-26.470963%-28.858124%29%28.858124%7.738409%26.470963%7.517920%36.596533%37%2,6893,357-43.968663%-49.804346%-43.968663%44%43.968663%0.008226%49.804346%0.419043%43.976889%44%4,0974,034-1.523932%-1.032507%-0.206090%-1.523932%2%1.523932%0.024089%1.032507%1.548021%2%142142-1.931745%-1.938738%-1.931745%2%1.931745%0.466598%1.938738%0.044801%2.398343%2%180220-3.608416%-7.263016%-2.577860%-6.998347%-10.871432%11%3.608416%2.577860%3.608416%4%1,013331-11.871798%-0.974307%-10.193821%-0.777328%-12.846104%13%11.871798%10.193821%11.871798%12%1,1971,089
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

The Married by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of South Dakota and State Senate District 28
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 176.434%6.43%50.885%50.9%34.177%34.2%67.974%68.0%63.607%63.6%69.684%69.7%65.309%65.3%69.801%69.8%68.521%68.5%62.442%62.4%61.366%61.4%57.838%57.8%50.426%50.4%48.940%48.9%59.259%59.3%54.307%54.3%55.451%55.5%49.693%49.7%51.236%51.2%46.701%46.7%41.692%41.7%34.646%34.6%20.872%20.9%6.355%6.36%3.361%3.36%1.014%1.01%0.000%0%0.163%0.16%
F percentage of married females in age cohort
M percentage of married males in age cohort

The Divorced1 by Sex and Age#5

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of South Dakota and State Senate District 28
Female
Male
0%5%10%15%20%25%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1727.346%27.3%4.425%4.42%13.449%13.4%15.904%15.9%10.710%10.7%19.629%19.6%14.630%14.6%15.100%15.1%18.817%18.8%20.349%20.3%23.204%23.2%24.584%24.6%27.983%28.0%20.881%20.9%21.164%21.2%18.686%18.7%17.362%17.4%15.184%15.2%7.418%7.42%9.702%9.70%9.819%9.82%5.512%5.51%4.756%4.76%0.649%0.65%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.488%0.49%
F percentage of divorced females in age cohort
M percentage of divorced males in age cohort
1and Separated

The Never Married by Sex and Age#6

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of South Dakota and State Senate District 28
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 171.340%1.34%1.770%1.77%2.215%2.22%3.922%3.92%2.295%2.30%4.471%4.47%6.335%6.33%10.969%11.0%6.154%6.15%13.372%13.4%12.603%12.6%11.876%11.9%15.483%15.5%29.038%29.0%16.402%16.4%26.715%26.7%25.976%26.0%34.816%34.8%41.346%41.3%43.596%43.6%48.489%48.5%59.843%59.8%74.373%74.4%92.996%93.0%96.639%96.6%98.986%99.0%100.000%100%99.350%99.3%
F percentage of never married females in age cohort
M percentage of never married males in age cohort

The Widowed by Sex and Age#7

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of South Dakota and State Senate District 28
Female
Male
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1764.879%64.9%42.920%42.9%50.158%50.2%12.200%12.2%23.388%23.4%6.216%6.22%13.725%13.7%4.131%4.13%6.509%6.51%3.837%3.84%2.827%2.83%5.701%5.70%6.108%6.11%1.142%1.14%3.175%3.17%0.292%0.29%1.211%1.21%0.307%0.31%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of widowed females in age cohort
M percentage of widowed males in age cohort

The Married by Age#8

Percentage of age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the upper state legislative districts in South Dakota.
Scope: population of South Dakota and State Senate District 28
State Senate District 28
South Dakota
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%Count85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 171395281,2219231,1161,008655708736734540207151
Count number of married in age cohort in State Senate District 28

Marital Status by Race#9

Percentage of each ethno-racial group.
Scope: population of South Dakota and State Senate District 28
State Senate District 28
South Dakota
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Married
Never Married
50%0%50%100%CountAsian2White HispanicWhite1Mixed2Other2Black2-36.840245%-1.943921%-5.301602%-0.000000%69.696970%-0.000000%30.303030%-0.000000%53.722903%2.191329%100.000000%100%33-16.346154%-10.576923%-40.492925%-2.605192%-10.383282%-26.923077%27%63.461538%-0.000000%9.615385%44.091463%2.427139%73.076923%73%208-22.231849%-0.857737%-10.881996%-26.781143%-0.883756%-10.362243%-33.971582%34%57.710969%8.317449%55.426379%6.546479%66.028418%66%11,54211.5k-34.935897%-0.961538%-5.769231%-54.021108%-1.660803%-10.930214%-41.666667%42%56.410256%1.923077%30.025362%3.362513%58.333333%58%312-52.091555%-2.683504%-15.611681%-54.263020%-2.790866%-13.690766%-70.386740%70%24.119968%5.493291%25.421067%3.834281%29.613260%30%6,335-60.655738%-19.672131%-1.639344%-50.750124%-3.596622%-10.342772%-81.967213%82%18.032787%0.000000%33.551913%1.758569%18.032787%18%61
Count number of people of given race
1non-Hispanic 2including Hispanic

Map of Marital Status by County in State Senate District 28

Married Marital Status by County#10

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
34.5%39.3%44.1%48.8%53.6%58.4%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County#11

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
8.4%10.0%11.5%13.0%14.5%16.0%

Widowed Marital Status by County#12

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
5.3%6.2%7.1%8.0%8.8%9.8%

Never Married Marital Status by County#13

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
21%27%32%37%43%49%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 28

Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#14

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
0%20%40%60%80%100%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County Subdivision#15

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
0%13%27%40%53%67%

Widowed Marital Status by County Subdivision#16

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
0%20%40%60%80%100%

Never Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#17

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Tract in State Senate District 28

Married Marital Status by Tract#18

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
26%34%41%47%54%62%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Tract#19

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
8.4%11.0%13.5%16.0%18.5%21.1%

Widowed Marital Status by Tract#20

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
5.3%6.2%7.1%8.0%8.8%9.8%

Never Married Marital Status by Tract#21

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
21%27%32%37%43%49%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Block Group in State Senate District 28

Married Marital Status by Block Group#22

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
26%35%44%53%62%71%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Block Group#23

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
7.4%11.9%16.4%20.9%25.3%29.9%

Widowed Marital Status by Block Group#24

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
2.7%4.8%6.8%8.9%10.9%13.0%

Never Married Marital Status by Block Group#25

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
12%20%28%36%44%53%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Marital Status by Place in State Senate District 28

There are 20 places in State Senate District 28. This section compares all 20 of those to each other, State Senate District 28, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 28.

Married by Place#26

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 28, selected places in State Senate District 28, and entities that contain State Senate District 28
0%20%40%60%80%Count#FruitdaleBisonMcIntoshSouth DakotaWest North CentralLemmonMidwestUnited StatesWhitehorseBelle FourcheSD-28MorristownTimber LakeBuffaloIsabelMcLaughlinLittle EagleDupreeCamp CrookN Eagle ButteEagle ButteBullheadGreen GrassLa PlantPrairie City86.046512%86.046512%86%37153.401361%53.401361%53%157253.333333%53.333333%53%88351.975162%51.975162%52%350,626351k51.461869%51.461869%51%8,666,3128.67M49.825784%49.825784%50%572449.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M46.808511%46.808511%47%44546.218118%46.218118%46%2,102646.135958%46.135958%46%8,53145.945946%45.945946%46%17745.205479%45.205479%45%198844.852941%44.852941%45%122942.342342%42.342342%42%471040.661939%40.661939%41%1721134.146341%34.146341%34%701227.821522%27.821522%28%1061327.272727%27.272727%27%211427.107558%27.107558%27%3731520.912548%20.912548%21%1651619.313305%19.313305%19%451714.814815%14.814815%15%4189.302326%9.302326%9%8190.000000%0.000000%0%020
Count number of this marital status
# rank of place out of 20 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County in State Senate District 28

There are 6 counties that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 28 (5 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 6 of those to each other, State Senate District 28, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 28.

Married by County#30

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 28, selected counties in State Senate District 28, and entities that contain State Senate District 28
0%20%40%Count#PerkinsHardingButteSouth DakotaWest North CentralMidwestUnited StatesSD-28CorsonDeweyZiebach58.356941%58.356941%58%1,442155.338904%55.338904%55%596254.217604%54.217604%54%4,435351.975162%51.975162%52%350,626351k51.461869%51.461869%51%8,666,3128.67M49.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M46.135958%46.135958%46%8,53140.075034%40.075034%40%1,175436.708861%36.708861%37%1,450534.515485%34.515485%35%6916
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county out of 6 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 28

There are 84 county subdivisions that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 28 (82 fully and 2 partially). This section compares the 50 most populous of those to each other, State Senate District 28, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 28. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 22.

Married by County Subdivision#34

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 28, selected county subdivisions in State Senate District 28, and entities that contain State Senate District 28
0%50%100%Count#ChanceGlendoCastle ButteFlat CrkLone TreeLemmonFruitdaleRockfordCusterNE PerkinsRidgelandPleasant RdgWest CorsonWhite ButteEast ButteWhite HillSouth PerkinsLodgepoleLincolnWest ButteSouth HardingNorth HardingCntrl PerkinsMarshfieldCash TownshipRolling GrnTown of BisonMcIntoshNorth ZiebachSouth DakotaWest North CentralDupreeLemmonMidwestUnited StatesEnglewoodBelle FourcheSD-28MorristownTimber LakeBuffaloIsabelMcLaughlinSouth ZiebachNorth DeweySouth DeweyEast CorsonBeck-HighlandDupreeCamp CrookSidneyEagle ButteWakpalaEagle ButteViking100.000000%100.000000%100%261100.000000%100.000000%100%202100.000000%100.000000%100%223100.000000%100.000000%100%104100.000000%100.000000%100%17590.909091%90.909091%91%50686.046512%86.046512%86%37785.714286%85.714286%86%18884.848485%84.848485%85%28984.347826%84.347826%84%971081.818182%81.818182%82%451181.250000%81.250000%81%131278.199052%78.199052%78%1651377.777778%77.777778%78%421476.865672%76.865672%77%5151576.190476%76.190476%76%161673.437500%73.437500%73%941772.222222%72.222222%72%261869.879518%69.879518%70%581969.696970%69.696970%70%1,2652066.952790%66.952790%67%1562160.000000%60.000000%60%2972257.142857%57.142857%57%402356.521739%56.521739%57%132456.521739%56.521739%57%132554.545455%54.545455%55%122653.401361%53.401361%53%1572753.333333%53.333333%53%882852.097902%52.097902%52%1492951.975162%51.975162%52%350,626351k51.461869%51.461869%51%8,666,3128.67M50.724638%50.724638%51%353049.825784%49.825784%50%5723149.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M48.000000%48.000000%48%243246.218118%46.218118%46%2,1023346.135958%46.135958%46%8,53145.945946%45.945946%46%173445.205479%45.205479%45%1983544.852941%44.852941%45%1223642.342342%42.342342%42%473740.661939%40.661939%41%1723837.455830%37.455830%37%3183937.109538%37.109538%37%8914036.942675%36.942675%37%2324131.000000%31.000000%31%5274230.434783%30.434783%30%74327.821522%27.821522%28%1064427.272727%27.272727%27%214524.137931%24.137931%24%74622.043011%22.043011%22%824720.224719%20.224719%20%364819.904077%19.904077%20%83490.000000%0.000000%0%050
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Upper State Legislative District in South Dakota

There are 35 upper state legislative districts in South Dakota. This section compares State Senate District 28 to all of the upper state legislative districts in South Dakota and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 28.

Married by Upper State Legislative District#38

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 28, selected other upper state legislative districts in South Dakota, and entities that contain State Senate District 28
0%20%40%60%Count#SD-4SD-6SD-11SD-25SD-30SD-19SD-2SD-16SD-29SD-23SD-22SD-8SD-14SD-34SD-20SD-10SD-24SD-33SD-1SD-31SD-18South DakotaSD-5West North CentralSD-21MidwestSD-3SD-9United StatesSD-13SD-35SD-17SD-28SD-12SD-26SD-32SD-7SD-27SD-1563.235529%63.235529%63%11,87511.9k162.859954%62.859954%63%12,13712.1k260.861599%60.861599%61%12,29112.3k360.533929%60.533929%61%11,92711.9k459.576401%59.576401%60%12,46112.5k559.561302%59.561302%60%10,78010.8k659.225513%59.225513%59%11,44011.4k757.413811%57.413811%57%10,95811.0k857.392152%57.392152%57%11,77411.8k957.208862%57.208862%57%10,27710.3k1056.906684%56.906684%57%10,36110.4k1156.873973%56.873973%57%10,72710.7k1256.617315%56.617315%57%11,28111.3k1355.855584%55.855584%56%11,10811.1k1455.576855%55.576855%56%11,01711.0k1555.409478%55.409478%55%10,66310.7k1654.963667%54.963667%55%10,28710.3k1753.605592%53.605592%54%10,19910.2k1852.874164%52.874164%53%10,11810.1k1952.694554%52.694554%53%11,09811.1k2052.075958%52.075958%52%9,7082151.975162%51.975162%52%350,626351k51.856701%51.856701%52%9,9012251.461869%51.461869%51%8,666,3128.67M51.180089%51.180089%51%9,1512349.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M49.108845%49.108845%49%10,30510.3k2449.035908%49.035908%49%9,9692548.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.550222%47.550222%48%9,1132647.461325%47.461325%47%9,5722746.341986%46.341986%46%8,6592846.135958%46.135958%46%8,5312942.387543%42.387543%42%7,8403041.726242%41.726242%42%7,1793140.316169%40.316169%40%8,6203238.693538%38.693538%39%8,2753332.885786%32.885786%33%5,5113430.337882%30.337882%30%5,51335
Count number of this marital status
# rank of upper state legislative district out of 35 by percentage of this marital status

Definitions

This page reports on the marital status of the residents of State Senate District 28 aged 15 and older. The following definitions are used in this page:

  • Never Married: a person over the age of 15 that has never been married
  • Married: married and not separated at the time of the survey, including cases where one spouse is absent for reasons other than a separation
  • Separated: including legal and de-facto separations for reasons of marital discord
  • Divorced: and not remarried at the time of the survey
  • Widowed: and not remarried at the time of the survey

These definition were taken directly from the US Census Bureau, and reflect the marital status at the time of the survey.

For additional information about the data presented on this site, including our sources, please see the About Page.

More Topics to Explore

Demographics

Income

Education

More Maps to Explore

State:
South Dakota
Counties:
Butte, Corson, Dewey, Harding, Perkins, Ziebach
Cities:
Belle Fourche, Dupree, Eagle Butte, Lemmon, McIntosh, McLaughlin, Timber Lake
Towns:
Bison, Buffalo, Camp Crook, Fruitdale, Isabel, Morristown
Townships:
Ada, Antelope, Barrett, Beck-Highland, Bison, Burdick, Cash, Chance, Chaudoin, Clark, Custer, De Witt, Duell, Englewood, Flat Creek, Foster, Fredlund, Glendo, Grand River, Hall, Horse Creek, Liberty, Lincoln, Lodgepole, Lone Tree, Maltby, Marshfield, Martin, Meadow, Moreau, Plateau, Pleasant Ridge, Prairie View, Rainbow, Ridgeland, Rockford, Rolling Green, Scotch Cap, Sherman, Sidney, Strool, Trail, Vail, Viking, Vrooman, Wakpala, Watauga, Wells, White Butte, Wilson
Unincorporated Places:
Bullhead, Green Grass, La Plant, Little Eagle, North Eagle Butte, Prairie City, Whitehorse
Unorganized Territories:
Castle Butte, Central Perkins, Duck Creek, Dupree, East Butte, East Corson, Jones, Lemmon, North Dewey, North Harding, North Ziebach, Northeast Perkins, Pleasant Valley, South Dewey, South Harding, South Perkins, South Ziebach, West Butte, West Corson, White Hill
Congressional District:
SD-At Large
State House Districts:
SD-28A, SD-28B
Unified School Districts:
Belle Fourche 09-1, Bison 52-1, Dupree 64-2, Eagle Butte 20-1, Faith 46-2, Harding County 31-1, Lemmon 52-4, McIntosh 15-1, McLaughlin 15-2, Newell 09-2, Smee 15-3, Spearfish 40-2, Timber Lake 20-3
ZIP Codes:
57442, 57601, 57620, 57621, 57622, 57623, 57625, 57626, 57630, 57633, 57634, 57636, 57638, 57639, 57640, 57641, 57642, 57644, 57645, 57649, 57650, 57651, 57652, 57656, 57657, 57658, 57660, 57661, 57717, 57720, 57724, 57748, 57755, 57758, 57760, 57776, 57783, 58623, 58649, 58653
Neighboring State Senate Districts:
MT-19, ND-28, ND-31, ND-39, SD-23, SD-24, SD-27, SD-29, SD-31, WY-1