Marital Status in State Senate District 27, Utah (State Senate District)

Marital Status#1

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Utah and State Senate District 27
Female Male
Utah
State Senate District 27
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedMarriedSeparated/DivorcedWidowed-24.181416%-26.516658%-24.181416%24%24.181416%5.062012%26.516658%6.094963%29.243427%29%8,74410,55610.6k-56.357854%-55.606467%-56.357854%56%56.357854%1.103985%55.606467%0.637344%57.461839%57%20,37920.4k20,74220.7k-11.222539%-0.724363%-9.486929%-2.608933%-11.946903%12%11.222539%9.486929%11.222539%11%4,3204,051-2.072194%-5.441633%-1.657638%-4.123375%-7.513827%8%2.072194%1.657638%2.072194%2%2,717748
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

Detailed Marital Status#2

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Utah and State Senate District 27
Female Male
Utah
State Senate District 27
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
40%20%0%20%40%FMNever MarriedNow MarriedSeparatedAbsent SpouseWidowedDivorced-24.181416%-26.516658%-24.181416%24%24.181416%5.062012%26.516658%6.094963%29.243427%29%8,74410,55610.6k-54.587942%-53.308512%-54.587942%55%54.587942%0.508049%53.308512%0.559739%55.095991%55%19,73919.7k19,88819.9k-1.698009%-1.369003%-0.446515%-1.698009%2%1.698009%0.271684%1.369003%1.969693%2%614711-1.769912%-2.297955%-1.769912%2%1.769912%0.595936%2.297955%0.077605%2.365848%2%640854-2.072194%-5.441633%-1.657638%-4.123375%-7.513827%8%2.072194%1.657638%2.072194%2%2,717748-9.252846%-0.996047%-8.117926%-2.162418%-10.248894%10%9.252846%8.117926%9.252846%9%3,7063,340
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

The Married by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Utah and State Senate District 27
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1713.885%13.9%51.102%51.1%46.436%46.4%81.807%81.8%63.438%63.4%81.478%81.5%68.722%68.7%79.347%79.3%73.436%73.4%73.820%73.8%76.646%76.6%73.659%73.7%74.868%74.9%65.913%65.9%69.838%69.8%74.698%74.7%75.601%75.6%66.741%66.7%69.525%69.5%71.649%71.6%60.081%60.1%40.627%40.6%29.268%29.3%21.051%21.1%6.481%6.48%3.457%3.46%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of married females in age cohort
M percentage of married males in age cohort

The Divorced1 by Sex and Age#5

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Utah and State Senate District 27
Female
Male
0%5%10%15%20%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 178.678%8.68%8.016%8.02%6.436%6.44%10.264%10.3%16.081%16.1%10.037%10.0%18.871%18.9%12.723%12.7%16.924%16.9%14.691%14.7%13.866%13.9%18.116%18.1%15.153%15.2%23.540%23.5%18.846%18.8%10.548%10.5%16.466%16.5%16.901%16.9%12.405%12.4%12.461%12.5%10.044%10.0%10.321%10.3%3.371%3.37%3.061%3.06%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.190%0.19%
F percentage of divorced females in age cohort
M percentage of divorced males in age cohort
1and Separated

The Never Married by Sex and Age#6

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Utah and State Senate District 27
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 170.401%0.40%0.200%0.20%1.485%1.49%0.922%0.92%2.629%2.63%2.387%2.39%5.275%5.27%6.064%6.06%5.151%5.15%7.791%7.79%5.987%5.99%7.174%7.17%6.965%6.97%10.132%10.1%9.331%9.33%14.616%14.6%7.617%7.62%16.358%16.4%17.595%17.6%15.293%15.3%29.653%29.7%49.052%49.1%67.361%67.4%75.888%75.9%93.519%93.5%96.543%96.5%100.000%100%99.810%99.8%
F percentage of never married females in age cohort
M percentage of never married males in age cohort

The Widowed by Sex and Age#7

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Utah and State Senate District 27
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1777.036%77.0%40.681%40.7%45.644%45.6%7.007%7.01%17.852%17.9%6.097%6.10%7.132%7.13%1.866%1.87%4.489%4.49%3.698%3.70%3.501%3.50%1.051%1.05%3.014%3.01%0.414%0.41%1.984%1.98%0.138%0.14%0.316%0.32%0.000%0%0.475%0.47%0.598%0.60%0.222%0.22%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of widowed females in age cohort
M percentage of widowed males in age cohort

The Married by Age#8

Percentage of age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the upper state legislative districts in Utah.
Scope: population of Utah and State Senate District 27
State Senate District 27
Utah
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%Count85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 173592,2695,1253,7214,2324,2223,5884,0684,4814,4742,7411,6841570
Count number of married in age cohort in State Senate District 27

Marital Status by Race#9

Percentage of each ethno-racial group.
Scope: population of Utah and State Senate District 27
State Senate District 27
Utah
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Married
Never Married
50%0%50%CountWhite1Asian2White HispanicOther2Mixed2Black2-22.388494%-1.493022%-10.564031%-27.238175%-1.270763%-9.596363%-34.445547%34%60.557190%4.997264%57.902182%3.992517%65.554453%66%58,47258.5k-39.672131%-0.983607%-32.271950%-1.460552%-5.271968%-40.655738%41%57.377049%-0.000000%1.967213%57.752515%3.243015%59.344262%59%305-35.748437%-6.767194%-7.263700%-38.134413%-3.450390%-8.456075%-49.779331%50%47.591026%2.629643%47.406778%2.552343%50.220669%50%5,438-51.380413%-1.220575%-5.013078%-39.364572%-3.302259%-6.658759%-57.614066%58%36.995060%5.390875%48.290651%2.383759%42.385934%42%6,882-54.438503%-7.165775%-51.605201%-1.680851%-7.754137%-61.604278%62%35.935829%-0.000000%2.459893%37.330969%1.628842%38.395722%38%935-44.000000%-26.222222%-43.851238%-3.559242%-11.027601%-70.222222%70%29.777778%-0.000000%0.000000%37.670079%3.891841%29.777778%30%225
Count number of people of given race
1non-Hispanic 2including Hispanic

Map of Marital Status by County in State Senate District 27

Married Marital Status by County#10

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
44.5%48.4%52.2%56.0%59.8%63.7%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County#11

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
6.8%9.7%12.5%15.3%18.1%21.0%

Widowed Marital Status by County#12

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
2.3%3.3%4.2%5.1%6.0%7.0%

Never Married Marital Status by County#13

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
21.5%25.3%29.1%32.9%36.7%40.5%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 27

Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#14

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
33%47%60%73%87%100%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County Subdivision#15

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
0%5%10%16%21%27%

Widowed Marital Status by County Subdivision#16

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
0.0%2.2%4.3%6.5%8.6%10.8%

Never Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#17

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
0%12%23%35%47%59%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Tract in State Senate District 27

Married Marital Status by Tract#18

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
33%41%48%55%62%70%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Tract#19

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
2.9%7.3%11.6%15.9%20.2%24.6%

Widowed Marital Status by Tract#20

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
0.9%2.5%4.0%5.6%7.1%8.7%

Never Married Marital Status by Tract#21

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
17%26%34%42%50%59%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Block Group in State Senate District 27

Married Marital Status by Block Group#22

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
32%42%51%60%69%78%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Block Group#23

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
0%7%13%19%25%32%

Widowed Marital Status by Block Group#24

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
0.0%2.6%5.3%7.9%10.5%13.2%

Never Married Marital Status by Block Group#25

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
3%15%26%37%49%61%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Marital Status by Place in State Senate District 27

There are 44 places that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 27 (40 fully and 4 partially). This section compares all 44 of those to each other, State Senate District 27, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 27.

Married by Place#26

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 27, selected places in State Senate District 27, and entities that contain State Senate District 27
0%20%40%60%80%Count#ClawsonTimber LakesThompson SpgsWest WoodOrangevilleFerronMapletonSalemClevelandCharlestonEmerySpringvilleSpanish ForkHuntingtonCastle ValleySpring GlenDanielElmoCastle DaleIndependenceUT-27UtahWellingtonGreen RiverTselakai DezzaHelperBluffCarbonvilleMonticelloBlandingMountainWestUnited StatesPriceMoabSpanish VlyE Carbon-SunnysideOljato-Monument VlyScofieldKenilworthMontezuma CrkLa SalNavajo MtnHalchitaAnethWhite MesaClear Creek87.500000%87.500000%88%112183.863636%83.863636%84%369279.629630%79.629630%80%43377.070064%77.070064%77%363472.857143%72.857143%73%816567.538760%67.538760%68%697666.443996%66.443996%66%4,277765.717092%65.717092%66%3,345865.405405%65.405405%65%242965.350877%65.350877%65%2981062.692308%62.692308%63%1631162.286514%62.286514%62%13,34813.3k1262.020607%62.020607%62%15,16915.2k1361.846572%61.846572%62%9111461.464968%61.464968%61%1931560.165975%60.165975%60%5801659.813084%59.813084%60%5121759.550562%59.550562%60%1591859.426230%59.426230%59%7251958.181818%58.181818%58%642056.909365%56.909365%57%41,12141.1k55.924736%55.924736%56%1,221,4271.22M54.170107%54.170107%54%6562153.164557%53.164557%53%4202252.727273%52.727273%53%582352.191235%52.191235%52%7862452.027027%52.027027%52%1542550.580945%50.580945%51%6532650.551181%50.551181%51%9632749.979798%49.979798%50%1,2372849.555906%49.555906%50%9,123,4519.12M48.094521%48.094521%48%28,965,61229.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M48.017200%48.017200%48%3,0152945.629883%45.629883%46%1,8693043.835616%43.835616%44%963143.341815%43.341815%43%5113241.079812%41.079812%41%3503339.130435%39.130435%39%93437.083333%37.083333%37%893530.902778%30.902778%31%893629.387755%29.387755%29%723724.745763%24.745763%25%733822.570533%22.570533%23%723918.150685%18.150685%18%53408.045977%8.045977%8%7410.000000%0.000000%0%042
Count number of this marital status
# rank of place out of 42 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Metro Area in State Senate District 27

There are 3 metro areas that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 27 (1 fully and 2 partially). This section compares all 3 of those to each other, State Senate District 27, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 27.

Married by Metro Area#30

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 27, selected metro areas in State Senate District 27, and entities that contain State Senate District 27
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%Count#Heber AreaProvo AreaUT-27UtahPrice AreaMountainWestUnited States61.775488%61.775488%62%12,47012.5k158.544614%58.544614%59%236,892237k256.909365%56.909365%57%41,12141.1k55.924736%55.924736%56%1,221,4271.22M52.741044%52.741044%53%8,495349.555906%49.555906%50%9,123,4519.12M48.094521%48.094521%48%28,965,61229.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M
Count number of this marital status
# rank of metro area out of 3 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County in State Senate District 27

There are 6 counties that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 27 (4 fully and 2 partially). This section compares all 6 of those to each other, State Senate District 27, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 27.

Married by County#34

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 27, selected counties in State Senate District 27, and entities that contain State Senate District 27
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%Count#EmeryWasatchUtahUT-27UtahCarbonGrandMountainWestUnited StatesSan Juan63.670412%63.670412%64%4,930161.775488%61.775488%62%12,47012.5k258.528252%58.528252%59%232,459232k356.909365%56.909365%57%41,12141.1k55.924736%55.924736%56%1,221,4271.22M52.741044%52.741044%53%8,495451.832873%51.832873%52%3,945549.555906%49.555906%50%9,123,4519.12M48.094521%48.094521%48%28,965,61229.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M44.548342%44.548342%45%5,0506
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county out of 6 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 27

There are 21 county subdivisions that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 27 (13 fully and 8 partially). This section compares all 21 of those to each other, State Senate District 27, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 27.

Married by County Subdivision#38

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 27, selected county subdivisions in State Senate District 27, and entities that contain State Senate District 27
0%50%100%Count#Uintah and OurayEmery-FerronHeber City ESpringville-MapletonCastle Dale-HuntingtonCastle Dale-Huntin…American Fork-Pleasant GrvAmerican Fork-Ple…Spanish Fork-PaysonSpanish Fork-Pay…Heber City WUT-27Green RiverUtahPriceMonticelloMoabHelperProvo-OremHeber City SBlandingMountainWestUnited StatesThompson SpgsEast CarbonCasa del Eco Mesa-White MesaCasa del Eco Mes…Oljato100.000000%100.000000%100%19169.154557%69.154557%69%1,047264.386590%64.386590%64%5,243363.812407%63.812407%64%20,23320.2k463.223525%63.223525%63%3,397562.905895%62.905895%63%57,40157.4k662.364614%62.364614%62%32,93632.9k761.434712%61.434712%61%4,145856.909365%56.909365%57%41,12141.1k56.775701%56.775701%57%486955.924736%55.924736%56%1,221,4271.22M53.945656%53.945656%54%6,6311052.387357%52.387357%52%1,5581151.888298%51.888298%52%3,9021251.347249%51.347249%51%1,3531350.113934%50.113934%50%82,03282.0k1449.927933%49.927933%50%1,7321549.712644%49.712644%50%1,7301649.555906%49.555906%50%9,123,4519.12M48.094521%48.094521%48%28,965,61229.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.252747%47.252747%47%431743.305085%43.305085%43%5111838.424242%38.424242%38%9511933.693394%33.693394%34%81120
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 20 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Upper State Legislative District in Utah

There are 29 upper state legislative districts in Utah. This section compares State Senate District 27 to all of the upper state legislative districts in Utah and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 27.

Married by Upper State Legislative District#42

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 27, selected other upper state legislative districts in Utah, and entities that contain State Senate District 27
0%20%40%60%Count#UT-13UT-11UT-17UT-22UT-14UT-7UT-10UT-21UT-9UT-20UT-26UT-29UT-24UT-23UT-19UT-27UT-28UtahUT-12UT-4UT-15UT-25UT-6UT-18UT-8UT-5MountainWestUT-1United StatesUT-16UT-3UT-268.298264%68.298264%68%48,94848.9k163.210457%63.210457%63%46,52146.5k263.141263%63.141263%63%44,35844.4k362.451124%62.451124%62%46,47846.5k462.059840%62.059840%62%43,62043.6k561.829707%61.829707%62%43,11243.1k661.056603%61.056603%61%50,65550.7k761.039215%61.039215%61%43,77043.8k859.848575%59.848575%60%45,13645.1k959.275975%59.275975%59%43,34243.3k1059.265172%59.265172%59%45,66545.7k1159.009358%59.009358%59%47,16547.2k1259.000163%59.000163%59%43,38443.4k1358.467101%58.467101%58%44,14544.1k1457.125083%57.125083%57%43,15843.2k1556.909365%56.909365%57%41,12141.1k1656.892429%56.892429%57%43,78143.8k1755.924736%55.924736%56%1,221,4271.22M55.593310%55.593310%56%40,08540.1k1855.333987%55.333987%55%43,48243.5k1954.833754%54.833754%55%42,12042.1k2054.336918%54.336918%54%40,93240.9k2153.148936%53.148936%53%39,62239.6k2252.292085%52.292085%52%39,53739.5k2351.234215%51.234215%51%40,28740.3k2449.943736%49.943736%50%37,28237.3k2549.555906%49.555906%50%9,123,4519.12M48.094521%48.094521%48%28,965,61229.0M48.073468%48.073468%48%33,71233.7k2648.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M45.076258%45.076258%45%35,79135.8k2739.914559%39.914559%40%31,58031.6k2838.306163%38.306163%38%32,63832.6k29
Count number of this marital status
# rank of upper state legislative district out of 29 by percentage of this marital status

Definitions

This page reports on the marital status of the residents of State Senate District 27 aged 15 and older. The following definitions are used in this page:

  • Never Married: a person over the age of 15 that has never been married
  • Married: married and not separated at the time of the survey, including cases where one spouse is absent for reasons other than a separation
  • Separated: including legal and de-facto separations for reasons of marital discord
  • Divorced: and not remarried at the time of the survey
  • Widowed: and not remarried at the time of the survey

These definition were taken directly from the US Census Bureau, and reflect the marital status at the time of the survey.

For additional information about the data presented on this site, including our sources, please see the About Page.

More Topics to Explore

Demographics

Income

Education

More Maps to Explore

State:
Utah
Counties:
Carbon, Emery, Grand, San Juan, Utah, Wasatch
Metro Areas:
Heber Area, Price Area, Provo Area
Cities:
Blanding, Castle Dale, East Carbon-Sunnyside, Ferron, Green River, Helper, Huntington, Mapleton, Moab, Monticello, Orangeville, Price, Salem, Spanish Fork, Springville, Wellington
Towns:
Castle Valley, Charleston, Clawson, Cleveland, Daniel, Elmo, Emery, Independence, Scofield
Unincorporated Places:
Aneth, Bluff, Carbonville, Clear Creek, Halchita, Halls Crossing, Kenilworth, La Sal, Mexican Hat, Montezuma Creek, Navajo Mountain, Oljato-Monument Valley, Spanish Valley, Spring Glen, Thompson Springs, Timber Lakes, Tselakai Dezza, West Wood, White Mesa
Congressional District:
UT-3
State House Districts:
UT-54, UT-64, UT-65, UT-69, UT-70, UT-73
Unified School Districts:
Alpine, Carbon, Emery, Grand, Nebo, San Juan, Wasatch
ZIP Codes:
81324, 81523, 84032, 84049, 84082, 84501, 84511, 84512, 84513, 84515, 84516, 84518, 84520, 84521, 84522, 84523, 84525, 84526, 84528, 84529, 84530, 84531, 84532, 84533, 84534, 84535, 84536, 84537, 84539, 84540, 84542, 84604, 84629, 84651, 84653, 84660, 84663, 84664, 86044, 86514
Neighboring State Senate Districts:
AZ-7, CO-6, CO-7, CO-8, NM-3, UT-7, UT-16, UT-24, UT-26