Employment Status in State Senate District 35, Michigan (State Senate District)

Employment Status#1

Percentage of population aged 25 to 64 years old.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
State Senate District 35
Michigan
0%10%20%30%40%50%CountArmed ForcesEmployed1UnemployedOther20.056875%0.046746%0.056875%0.1%11847.219129%55.946083%47.219129%47.2%97,96698.0k4.981419%5.191800%4.981419%5.0%10,33510.3k47.742576%38.815371%47.742576%47.7%99,05299.1k
Count population with given employment status
1excluding armed forces 2not in the labor force

Employment Status By Sex#2

Percentage of male and female population aged 25 to 64 years old.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
State Senate District 35
Michigan
40%20%0%20%40%FMArmed ForcesEmployed1UnemployedOther2-0.032758%-0.032758%-0.032758%0.0%0.032758%0.048263%0.032758%0.048263%0.081020%0.1%3484-44.955826%-44.955826%-44.955826%45.0%44.955826%4.529118%44.955826%4.529118%49.484944%49.5%46,66146.7k51,30551.3k-3.876947%-3.876947%-3.876947%3.9%3.876947%2.210168%3.876947%2.210168%6.087116%6.1%4,0246,311-44.346920%-6.787549%-44.346920%-6.787549%-51.134470%51.1%44.346920%44.346920%44.346920%44.3%53,07453.1k45,97846.0k
F females with given employment status
M males with given employment status
1excluding armed forces 2not in the labor force

Employment Status by Age#3

Employment status composition of the given age cohorts.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35
Armed Forces
Employed
Unemployed
Not in Labor Force
75+70-7465-6962-6460-6155-5945-5435-4430-3425-2922-2420-2116-190.000000%4.487452%0.378562%95.133986%95%1,0550.000000%11.107955%11%0.816761%88.075284%88%1,5640.000000%19.650587%20%1.168188%79.181226%79%3,7680.000000%34.888535%35%2.070064%63.041401%63%4,3820.000000%48.030156%48%3.562743%48.407101%48%3,9500.000000%57.823034%58%4.454364%37.722602%38%12,43612.4k0.028748%68.874515%69%5.703608%25.393129%25%23,96824.0k0.130301%73.387033%73%5.500276%20.982390%21%18,61918.6k0.064898%68.313458%68%7.901355%8%23.720289%24%8,4290.269360%68.602694%69%10.572391%11%20.555556%21%8,1820.296545%65.097989%65%12.080970%12%22.524497%23%5,0720.121163%64.438611%64%13.651050%14%21.789176%22%3,1970.052682%30.345070%30%10.325753%10%59.276495%59%3,4620%20%40%60%80%100%Count
Count number of people in age cohort

Employment by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of population employed by sex and age cohort.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM75+70-7465-6962-6460-6155-5945-5435-4430-3425-2922-2420-2116-193.720%3.72%5.413%5.41%10.255%10.3%12.005%12.0%17.399%17.4%21.783%21.8%32.654%32.7%37.091%37.1%45.190%45.2%50.848%50.8%55.566%55.6%60.204%60.2%66.920%66.9%70.908%70.9%71.387%71.4%75.536%75.5%64.112%64.1%72.637%72.6%66.259%66.3%71.296%71.3%61.648%61.6%68.628%68.6%68.612%68.6%61.008%61.0%33.014%33.0%28.010%28.0%
F employed females as percentage of age cohort
M employed males as percentage of age cohort

Employment Sex Ratio by Age#5

Percentage more males or females employed by age cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
More Females More Males
Michigan
State Senate District 35
10%0%10%20%30%M:FFM75+70-7465-6962-6460-6155-5945-5435-4430-3425-2922-2420-2116-1920.711297%29.387846%20.711297%20.7%1.2071.2147857711.351351%26.336006%11.351351%11.4%1.1141.1174082432.162662%14.979200%32.162662%32.2%1.3221.321,6232,14515.225933%9.326338%15.225933%15.2%1.1521.152,0362,34613.398163%8.923130%13.398163%13.4%1.1341.131,8512,0992.705786%2.980932%2.705786%2.7%1.0271.036,1356,3014.802187%7.444631%4.802187%4.8%1.0481.0511,70311.7k12,26512.3k11.651699%11.760030%11.651699%11.7%1.1171.128,7979,82213.500507%13.593547%13.500507%13.5%1.1351.143,9484,48115.997888%9.853443%15.997888%16.0%1.1601.163,7884,39428.984199%2.360468%28.984199%29.0%1.2901.292,2152,857-2.151310%1.449275%1.449275%1.4%1.0141.011,5871,610-7.553957%-11.321746%-7.553957%7.6%0.9300.931,7941,668
M:F ratio of males to females in the age cohort
F employed females in the age cohort
M employed males in the age cohort

Male Employment by Age#6

Percentage of male population employed by age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the upper state legislative districts in Michigan.
Scope: population of Michigan, State Senate District 35, and selected other upper state legislative districts in Michigans
State Senate District 35
Michigan
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%20%40%60%80%100%%75+70-7465-6962-6460-6155-5945-5435-4430-3425-2922-2420-2116-195.413%5.41%12.005%12.0%21.783%21.8%37.091%37.1%50.848%50.8%60.204%60.2%70.908%70.9%75.536%75.5%72.637%72.6%71.296%71.3%68.628%68.6%61.008%61.0%28.010%28.0%
% employed percentage of male population in State Senate District 35

Female Employment by Age#7

Percentage of female population employed by age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the upper state legislative districts in Michigan.
Scope: population of Michigan, State Senate District 35, and selected other upper state legislative districts in Michigans
State Senate District 35
Michigan
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%20%40%60%80%100%%75+70-7465-6962-6460-6155-5945-5435-4430-3425-2922-2420-2116-193.720%3.72%10.255%10.3%17.399%17.4%32.654%32.7%45.190%45.2%55.566%55.6%66.920%66.9%71.387%71.4%64.112%64.1%66.259%66.3%61.648%61.6%68.612%68.6%33.014%33.0%
% employed percentage of female population in State Senate District 35

Employment among the Married#8

Selected family employment structures as a percentage of all married couple households.
Scope: households in Michigan and State Senate District 35
State Senate District 35
Michigan
0%10%20%30%CountBoth Parents Work1Stay at Home Moms1Stay at Home Dads1Neither Parent WorksNeither Parent Wo…1Both Work, No Kids2Ladies Who Lunch2Gents Who Lunch2Neither Works, No KidsNeither Works, No …216.503497%25.004747%16.503497%16.5%8,8506.582751%9.751588%6.582751%6.6%3,5301.542191%1.669471%1.542191%1.5%8270.990210%0.801191%0.990210%1.0%53122.702098%24.481218%22.702098%22.7%12,17412.2k10.422378%10.516880%10.422378%10.4%5,5898.565035%6.989638%8.565035%8.6%4,59332.691841%20.785267%32.691841%32.7%17,53117.5k
1children under 18 present in the house 2no children under 18 present in the house

Employment among the Married With Children#9

Selected employment arrangements as a percentage of married couples with children under 18 present in the house.
Scope: households in Michigan and State Senate District 35
State Senate District 35
Michigan
0%20%40%60%CountBoth WorkStay at Home MomsStay at Home DadsNeither Work64.419857%67.168317%64.419857%64.4%8,85025.695152%26.194935%25.695152%25.7%3,5306.019799%4.484571%6.019799%6.0%8273.865191%2.152177%3.865191%3.9%531

Employment among the Married Without Children#10

Selected employment arrangements as a percentage of married couples without children under 18 present in the house.
Scope: households in Michigan and State Senate District 35
State Senate District 35
Michigan
0%10%20%30%40%CountBoth WorkLadies Who LunchGents Who LunchNeither Work30.521222%38.999596%30.521222%30.5%12,17412.2k14.012084%16.753827%14.012084%14.0%5,58911.515030%11.134784%11.515030%11.5%4,59343.951663%33.111792%43.951663%44.0%17,53117.5k

Employment by Educational Attainment#11

Percentage of population that is employed by highest level of educational attainment among the population aged 25 to 64 years old.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
State Senate District 35
Michigan
0%20%40%60%80%CountBachelor's Degree1Some College2H.S. Diploma3No H.S. Diploma375.457405%82.726888%75.457405%75.5%17,03317.0k66.876889%72.176643%66.876889%66.9%30,75230.8k59.831038%61.812126%59.831038%59.8%27,40827.4k38.982359%43.286417%38.982359%39.0%4,773
Count employed people with given educational attainment aged 25 to 64 years old
1or higher 2two or four year institution 3H.S. = High School

The Non-Working by Race#12

Percentage of each ethno-racial group's population 16 to 64 years of age that is either unemployed or not in the labor force.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
Female Male
Michigan
State Senate District 35
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%%BlackMixedOtherAsianHispanic1White-78.042328%-3.407565%-43.121469%-81.449893%81.4%78.042328%43.121469%7.603048%78.042328%78.0%78.849%78.8%-53.437967%-44.081481%-0.802742%-53.437967%53.4%53.437967%6.430993%44.081481%59.868960%59.9%56.506%56.5%-42.297650%-6.612302%-33.877054%-10.723603%-48.909953%48.9%42.297650%33.877054%42.297650%42.3%45.463%45.5%-41.358025%-0.328158%-25.579385%-19.023949%-41.686183%41.7%41.358025%25.579385%41.358025%41.4%41.545%41.5%-39.055794%-3.900970%-28.772621%-11.711574%-42.956764%43.0%39.055794%28.772621%39.055794%39.1%41.031%41.0%-35.907445%-4.475763%-27.527104%-6.727343%-40.383208%40.4%35.907445%27.527104%35.907445%35.9%38.129%38.1%
% percentage of both sexes combined
1white Hispanic

Unemployment by Race#13

Percentage unemployed of each ethno-racial group's population 16 to 64 years of age.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
Female Male
Michigan
State Senate District 35
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
20%15%10%5%0%5%10%15%%BlackMixedHispanic1OtherWhiteAsian-9.126984%-11.981758%-11.301177%-21.108742%21.1%9.126984%11.301177%1.728093%9.126984%9.1%11.964%12.0%-9.715994%-8.713716%-9.715994%9.7%9.715994%6.254522%8.713716%1.871371%15.970516%16.0%12.700%12.7%-7.796853%-2.105518%-6.246904%-9.902371%9.9%7.796853%6.246904%1.889536%7.796853%7.8%8.863%8.86%-3.412322%-6.851244%-3.412322%3.4%3.412322%7.727800%6.851244%1.405763%11.140122%11.1%7.441%7.44%-4.991747%-4.445693%-4.991747%5.0%4.991747%2.698058%4.445693%1.319025%7.689805%7.7%6.351%6.35%-0.925926%-1.884379%-3.727853%-0.289814%-2.810304%2.8%0.925926%3.727853%0.925926%0.9%1.997%2.00%
% percentage of both sexes combined
1white Hispanic

Armed Forces by Race#14

Percentage of each ethno-racial group's population 16 to 64 years of age in the armed forces.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
Female Male
Michigan
State Senate District 35
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
0.4%0.2%0.0%0.2%%Hispanic1WhiteBlackAsianMixedOther-0.357654%-0.060756%-0.074832%-0.418410%0.42%0.357654%0.074832%0.072709%0.357654%0.36%0.388%0.39%-0.040187%-0.018055%-0.040187%0.04%0.040187%0.071547%0.018055%0.077760%0.111733%0.11%0.076%0.08%-0.000000%-0.017566%0.000000%0.00%0.000000%0.000000%0.017566%0.075704%0.000000%0.00%0.000%0%-0.000000%-0.011884%0.000000%0.00%0.000000%0.000000%0.011884%0.003740%0.000000%0.00%0.000%0%-0.000000%-0.036007%0.000000%0.00%0.000000%0.000000%0.036007%0.103759%0.000000%0.00%0.000%0%-0.000000%-0.073754%-0.012591%0.000000%0.00%0.000000%0.000000%0.073754%0.000000%0.00%0.000%0%
% percentage of both sexes combined
1white Hispanic

Employment by Race#15

Percentage employed of each ethno-racial group's population 16 to 64 years of age.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
Female Male
Michigan
State Senate District 35
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
60%40%20%0%20%40%60%%WhiteHispanic1AsianOtherMixedBlack-59.616792%-65.745553%-59.616792%59.6%59.616792%4.475763%65.745553%6.727343%64.092555%64.1%61.871%61.9%-57.043236%-59.515804%-57.043236%57.0%57.043236%3.900970%59.515804%11.711574%60.944206%60.9%58.969%59.0%-58.313817%-55.396667%-58.313817%58.3%58.313817%0.328158%55.396667%19.023949%58.641975%58.6%58.455%58.5%-51.090047%-55.399343%-51.090047%51.1%51.090047%6.612302%55.399343%10.723603%57.702350%57.7%54.537%54.5%-40.131040%-6.430993%-55.115777%-46.562033%46.6%40.131040%55.115777%0.802742%40.131040%40.1%43.494%43.5%-18.550107%-49.275483%-7.603048%-18.550107%18.6%18.550107%3.407565%49.275483%21.957672%22.0%21.151%21.2%
% percentage of both sexes combined
1white Hispanic

Map of Employment Status by County in State Senate District 35

Both Parents Work Employment Status by County#16

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which both parents work outside the home (%):
9.6%12.2%14.7%17.2%19.7%22.3%

Stay at Home Moms Employment Status by County#17

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which the husband works outside the home and the wife stays at home (%):
4.6%5.7%6.7%7.7%8.7%9.8%

Stay at Home Dads Employment Status by County#18

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which the wife works outside the home and the husband stays at home (%):
0.79%1.21%1.62%2.03%2.44%2.86%

Neither Parent Works Employment Status by County#19

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which neither parent works outside the home (%):
0.07%0.47%0.86%1.25%1.65%2.04%

Employed Working-Age Men Employment Status by County#20

Percentage of male population aged 35 to 44 years old that are employed
62.9%67.2%71.3%75.5%79.7%84.0%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Employment Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 35

Both Parents Work Employment Status by County Subdivision#21

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which both parents work outside the home (%):
0%9%18%27%36%45%

Stay at Home Moms Employment Status by County Subdivision#22

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which the husband works outside the home and the wife stays at home (%):
0%13%25%38%51%64%

Stay at Home Dads Employment Status by County Subdivision#23

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which the wife works outside the home and the husband stays at home (%):
0.0%2.1%4.1%6.2%8.3%10.4%

Neither Parent Works Employment Status by County Subdivision#24

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which neither parent works outside the home (%):
0.0%1.4%2.8%4.1%5.5%6.9%

Employed Working-Age Men Employment Status by County Subdivision#25

Percentage of male population aged 35 to 44 years old that are employed
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Employment Status by Tract in State Senate District 35

Both Parents Work Employment Status by Tract#26

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which both parents work outside the home (%):
2.4%7.3%12.2%17.2%22.1%27.0%

Stay at Home Moms Employment Status by Tract#27

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which the husband works outside the home and the wife stays at home (%):
0.0%2.9%5.9%8.8%11.8%14.8%

Stay at Home Dads Employment Status by Tract#28

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which the wife works outside the home and the husband stays at home (%):
0.0%1.4%2.8%4.2%5.6%7.0%

Neither Parent Works Employment Status by Tract#29

Percentage of married families with children under the age of 18 present in which neither parent works outside the home (%):
0.0%1.1%2.2%3.2%4.3%5.4%

Employed Working-Age Men Employment Status by Tract#30

Percentage of male population aged 35 to 44 years old that are employed
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Employment Status by Place in State Senate District 35

There are 78 places that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 35 (77 fully and 1 partially). This section compares the 50 most populous of those to each other, State Senate District 35, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35. The least populous of the compared places has a population of 262.

Employed Working-Age Men by Place#35

Percentage of male population aged 35 to 44 years old that are employed.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected places in State Senate District 35, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%50%100%Count#McBainNorthportEastlakeBear LakeLutherLelandLuptonCusterWellstonOak HillGreilickvillePrescottScottvilleMantonMarionBrethrenOnekamaSuttons BayKalkaskaMidwestUnited States of AmericaUnited StatesEast North CentralHoughton LakeMichiganManisteeManistee LakeTraverse CityCadillacRapid CityState Senate District 35MI-35West BranchBuckleyRose CityReed CitySkidway LakeBenzoniaLudingtonRoscommonThompsonvilleGraylingFrankfortPrudenvilleLake CityKalevaSouth BoardmanS BoardmanMesickLe RoyEvartSt. HelenBaldwinHardwood AcresParkdaleHerseyHaringEmpire100.000000%100.000000%100.0%71100.000000%100.000000%100.0%142100.000000%100.000000%100.0%243100.000000%100.000000%100.0%174100.000000%100.000000%100.0%135100.000000%100.000000%100.0%266100.000000%100.000000%100.0%167100.000000%100.000000%100.0%78100.000000%100.000000%100.0%11993.750000%93.750000%93.8%601093.478261%93.478261%93.5%431192.307692%92.307692%92.3%241291.860465%91.860465%91.9%791390.361446%90.361446%90.4%751489.473684%89.473684%89.5%171587.804878%87.804878%87.8%361686.363636%86.363636%86.4%191786.206897%86.206897%86.2%251884.827586%84.827586%84.8%1231984.507990%84.507990%84.5%3,510,6363.51M83.826751%83.826751%83.8%16,918,49516.9M83.320331%83.320331%83.3%2,401,9262.40M81.318681%81.318681%81.3%1482081.139963%81.139963%81.1%478,058478k81.105991%81.105991%81.1%1762180.769231%80.769231%80.8%212280.297030%80.297030%80.3%8112377.864992%77.864992%77.9%4962477.000000%77.000000%77.0%772575.536415%75.536415%75.5%9,82273.684211%73.684211%73.7%982672.500000%72.500000%72.5%292769.230769%69.230769%69.2%182868.627451%68.627451%68.6%1402968.348624%68.348624%68.3%1493066.666667%66.666667%66.7%143165.165877%65.165877%65.2%2753265.151515%65.151515%65.2%433364.705882%64.705882%64.7%223463.809524%63.809524%63.8%673563.636364%63.636364%63.6%493661.764706%61.764706%61.8%423761.538462%61.538462%61.5%403856.250000%56.250000%56.3%183954.285714%54.285714%54.3%194054.166667%54.166667%54.2%134150.000000%50.000000%50.0%74244.943820%44.943820%44.9%404344.881890%44.881890%44.9%574444.252874%44.252874%44.3%774535.714286%35.714286%35.7%204632.258065%32.258065%32.3%104710.000000%10.000000%10.0%1480.000000%0.000000%0.0%0490.000000%0.000000%0.0%050
Count number of employed 35 to 44 year old men
# rank of place out of 50 by percentage employed 35 to 44 year old men

Employment Status by Metro Area in State Senate District 35

There are 3 metro areas that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 35 (2 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 3 of those to each other, State Senate District 35, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35.

Employed Working-Age Men by Metro Area#40

Percentage of male population aged 35 to 44 years old that are employed.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected metro areas in State Senate District 35, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%20%40%60%80%Count#MidwestUnited States of AmericaUnited StatesEast North CentralCadillac Metro AreaCadillac AreaMichiganLudington Metro AreaLudingtonTraverse City Metro AreaTraverse CityState Senate District 35MI-3584.507990%84.507990%84.5%3,510,6363.51M83.826751%83.826751%83.8%16,918,49516.9M83.320331%83.320331%83.3%2,401,9262.40M81.281166%81.281166%81.3%2,119181.139963%81.139963%81.1%478,058478k79.333333%79.333333%79.3%1,190278.694362%78.694362%78.7%6,630375.536415%75.536415%75.5%9,822
Count number of employed 35 to 44 year old men
# rank of metro area out of 3 by percentage employed 35 to 44 year old men

Employment Status by County in State Senate District 35

There are 12 counties in State Senate District 35. This section compares all 12 of those to each other, State Senate District 35, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35.

Employed Working-Age Men by County#45

Percentage of male population aged 35 to 44 years old that are employed.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected counties in State Senate District 35, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%20%40%60%80%Count#MidwestLeelanau CountyLeelanauUnited States of AmericaUnited StatesMissaukee CountyMissaukeeEast North CentralMichiganWexford CountyWexfordMason CountyMasonBenzie CountyBenzieCrawford CountyCrawfordOgemaw CountyOgemawState Senate District 35MI-35Osceola CountyOsceolaRoscommon CountyRoscommonKalkaska CountyKalkaskaLake CountyLakeManistee CountyManistee84.507990%84.507990%84.5%3,510,6363.51M83.939394%83.939394%83.9%831183.826751%83.826751%83.8%16,918,49516.9M83.699871%83.699871%83.7%647283.320331%83.320331%83.3%2,401,9262.40M81.139963%81.139963%81.1%478,058478k80.261723%80.261723%80.3%1,472379.333333%79.333333%79.3%1,190478.498294%78.498294%78.5%690577.080063%77.080063%77.1%491676.908924%76.908924%76.9%836775.536415%75.536415%75.5%9,82273.713381%73.713381%73.7%931872.745694%72.745694%72.7%718970.571696%70.571696%70.6%7531065.032680%65.032680%65.0%3981162.954876%62.954876%63.0%86512
Count number of employed 35 to 44 year old men
# rank of county out of 12 by percentage employed 35 to 44 year old men

Employment Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 35

There are 175 county subdivisions in State Senate District 35. This section compares the 50 most populous of those to each other, State Senate District 35, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 1,489.

Employed Working-Age Men by County Subdivision#50

Percentage of male population aged 35 to 44 years old that are employed.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected county subdivisions in State Senate District 35, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%50%100%Count#Pere Marquette Charter TownshipPere MarquetteLeelanau TownshipLeelanauLeland TownshipLelandChurchill TownshipChurchillInland TownshipInlandGerrish TownshipGerrishLincoln TownshipLincolnAmber TownshipAmberElmwood Charter TownshipElmwoodHamlin TownshipHamlinBear Lake TownshipBear LkCherry Grove TownshipCherry GrvRichmond TownshipRichmondClam Lake TownshipClam LkBeaver Creek TownshipBeaver CrkBingham TownshipBinghamAlmira TownshipAlmiraMidwestLake TownshipUnited States of AmericaUnited StatesCedar Creek TownshipCedar CrkEast North CentralFiler Charter TownshipFilerSelma TownshipSelmaRoscommon TownshipRoscommonMichiganManisteeHomestead TownshipHomesteadHersey TownshipHerseyWest Branch TownshipW BranchGrayling Charter TownshipGraylingCadillacHanover TownshipHanoverState Senate District 35MI-35West BranchSouth Branch TownshipS BranchPleasant Plains TownshipPleasant PlainsKalkaska TownshipKalkaskaSolon TownshipSolonReed CityDenton TownshipDentonSuttons Bay TownshipSuttons BayClearwater TownshipClearwaterSpringville TownshipSpringvilleLudingtonGraylingMills TownshipMillsMarion TownshipMarionMarkey TownshipMarkeyHaring Charter TownshipHaringBenzonia TownshipBenzoniaHiggins TownshipHigginsRichfield TownshipRichfieldEvartManistee TownshipManistee100.000000%100.000000%100.0%1411100.000000%100.000000%100.0%692100.000000%100.000000%100.0%1153100.000000%100.000000%100.0%69496.000000%96.000000%96.0%120593.975904%93.975904%94.0%156691.549296%91.549296%91.5%65790.909091%90.909091%90.9%80890.410959%90.410959%90.4%198989.542484%89.542484%89.5%1371088.732394%88.732394%88.7%631188.549618%88.549618%88.5%1161285.714286%85.714286%85.7%721385.542169%85.542169%85.5%1421485.074627%85.074627%85.1%571584.905660%84.905660%84.9%901684.873950%84.873950%84.9%2021784.507990%84.507990%84.5%3,510,6363.51M84.049080%84.049080%84.0%1371883.826751%83.826751%83.8%16,918,49516.9M83.516484%83.516484%83.5%761983.320331%83.320331%83.3%2,401,9262.40M82.500000%82.500000%82.5%1322081.879195%81.879195%81.9%1222181.226054%81.226054%81.2%2122281.139963%81.139963%81.1%478,058478k81.105991%81.105991%81.1%1762380.000000%80.000000%80.0%842479.775281%79.775281%79.8%712579.687500%79.687500%79.7%1022679.139073%79.139073%79.1%2392777.864992%77.864992%77.9%4962877.777778%77.777778%77.8%562975.536415%75.536415%75.5%9,82273.684211%73.684211%73.7%983073.015873%73.015873%73.0%463172.794118%72.794118%72.8%993272.285714%72.285714%72.3%2533372.131148%72.131148%72.1%443468.627451%68.627451%68.6%1403567.096774%67.096774%67.1%1043666.844920%66.844920%66.8%1253766.025641%66.025641%66.0%1033865.168539%65.168539%65.2%583965.165877%65.165877%65.2%2754063.809524%63.809524%63.8%674163.602941%63.602941%63.6%1734263.235294%63.235294%63.2%434361.971831%61.971831%62.0%444459.574468%59.574468%59.6%564558.035714%58.035714%58.0%654657.731959%57.731959%57.7%564747.945205%47.945205%47.9%704844.943820%44.943820%44.9%404926.315789%26.315789%26.3%11050
Count number of employed 35 to 44 year old men
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage employed 35 to 44 year old men

Employment Status by Upper State Legislative District in Michigan

There are 38 upper state legislative districts in Michigan. This section compares State Senate District 35 to all of the upper state legislative districts in Michigan and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35.

Employed Working-Age Men by Upper State Legislative District#55

Percentage of male population aged 35 to 44 years old that are employed.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected other upper state legislative districts in Michigan, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%20%40%60%80%Count#State Senate District 15MI-15State Senate District 13MI-13State Senate District 22MI-22State Senate District 30MI-30State Senate District 7MI-7State Senate District 10MI-10State Senate District 28MI-28State Senate District 14MI-14State Senate District 26MI-26State Senate District 11MI-11State Senate District 12MI-12State Senate District 25MI-25State Senate District 8MI-8State Senate District 18MI-18MidwestUnited States of AmericaUnited StatesState Senate District 20MI-20State Senate District 21MI-21East North CentralState Senate District 29MI-29State Senate District 24MI-24State Senate District 6MI-6State Senate District 17MI-17State Senate District 9MI-9MichiganState Senate District 32MI-32State Senate District 23MI-23State Senate District 31MI-31State Senate District 36MI-36State Senate District 19MI-19State Senate District 35MI-35State Senate District 38MI-38State Senate District 37MI-37State Senate District 34MI-34State Senate District 33MI-33State Senate District 5MI-5State Senate District 16MI-16State Senate District 3MI-3State Senate District 4MI-4State Senate District 1MI-1State Senate District 2MI-2State Senate District 27MI-2793.976853%93.976853%94.0%15,50915.5k192.974660%92.974660%93.0%17,57517.6k291.985077%91.985077%92.0%14,30014.3k391.307017%91.307017%91.3%14,87314.9k490.693780%90.693780%90.7%15,16415.2k589.351387%89.351387%89.4%16,03516.0k688.702780%88.702780%88.7%14,93414.9k787.265554%87.265554%87.3%13,49313.5k886.373310%86.373310%86.4%13,79913.8k986.192253%86.192253%86.2%15,01915.0k1085.802005%85.802005%85.8%13,69413.7k1185.503524%85.503524%85.5%12,98213.0k1285.239598%85.239598%85.2%14,85314.9k1384.962224%84.962224%85.0%14,05714.1k1484.507990%84.507990%84.5%3,510,6363.51M83.826751%83.826751%83.8%16,918,49516.9M83.513681%83.513681%83.5%12,11712.1k1583.353900%83.353900%83.4%12,83412.8k1683.320331%83.320331%83.3%2,401,9262.40M83.233568%83.233568%83.2%14,04414.0k1783.166868%83.166868%83.2%13,07313.1k1882.043212%82.043212%82.0%13,55613.6k1981.536587%81.536587%81.5%12,71412.7k2081.370837%81.370837%81.4%13,51013.5k2181.139963%81.139963%81.1%478,058478k80.968929%80.968929%81.0%11,88311.9k2280.210182%80.210182%80.2%11,75411.8k2379.679727%79.679727%79.7%11,69311.7k2479.528428%79.528428%79.5%10,08510.1k2578.003960%78.003960%78.0%12,60712.6k2675.536415%75.536415%75.5%9,8222774.987133%74.987133%75.0%10,19910.2k2873.896843%73.896843%73.9%11,30411.3k2973.512086%73.512086%73.5%10,85710.9k3072.428247%72.428247%72.4%10,19510.2k3172.039128%72.039128%72.0%10,97311.0k3271.436616%71.436616%71.4%11,41711.4k3368.993143%68.993143%69.0%9,5593468.182434%68.182434%68.2%10,06110.1k3566.246370%66.246370%66.2%9,3523666.188888%66.188888%66.2%9,3283764.898619%64.898619%64.9%8,83438
Count number of employed 35 to 44 year old men
# rank of upper state legislative district out of 38 by percentage employed 35 to 44 year old men

Definitions

  • Armed Forces: persons on active duty in the Armed Forces
  • Employed: persons who did any work for pay during the survey week, those who did at least 15 hours of unpaid work in a family-owned enterprise operated by someone in their household, and those who were temporarily absent from their regular jobs
  • Unemployed: persons are classified as unemployed if they do not have a job, have actively looked for work in the prior 4 weeks, and are currently available for work
  • Not in Labor Force: not in the labor force are those who are not classified as employed or unemployed during the survey reference week
  • Working-Age Men: males aged 35 to 44 years old, the national peak employment age

For additional information about the data presented on this site, including our sources, please see the About Page.

More Topics to Explore

Demographics

Income

Education

More Maps to Explore

State:
Michigan
Counties:
Benzie, Crawford, Kalkaska, Lake, Leelanau, Manistee, Mason, Missaukee, Ogemaw, Osceola, Roscommon, Wexford
Metro Areas:
Cadillac Area, Ludington Area, Traverse City Area
Charter Townships:
Elmwood, Filer, Grayling, Haring, Pere Marquette
Cities:
Cadillac, Evart, Frankfort, Grayling, Lake City, Ludington, Manistee, Manton, McBain, Reed City, Rose City, Scottville, Traverse City, West Branch
Townships:
Aetna, Almira, Amber, Antioch, Arcadia, Au Sable, Backus, Bear Lake, Bear Lake, Beaver Creek, Benzonia, Bingham, Blaine, Bloomfield, Blue Lake, Boardman, Boon, Branch, Brown, Burdell, Butterfield, Caldwell, Cedar, Cedar Creek, Centerville, Chase, Cherry Grove, Cherry Valley, Churchill, Clam Lake, Clam Union, Clearwater, Cleon, Cleveland, Coldsprings, Colfax, Colfax, Crystal Lake, Cumming, Custer, Denton, Dickson, Dover, Eden, Eden, Edwards, Elk, Ellsworth, Empire, Enterprise, Evart, Excelsior, Forest, Foster, Frederic, Free Soil, Garfield, Gerrish, Gilmore, Glen Arbor, Goodar, Grant, Greenwood, Hamlin, Hanover, Hartwick, Henderson, Hersey, Higgins, Highland, Hill, Holland, Homestead, Horton, Inland, Joyfield, Kalkaska, Kasson, Klacking, Lake, Lake, Lake, Lake, Le Roy, Leelanau, Leland, Liberty, Lincoln, Logan, Logan, Lovells, Lyon, Manistee, Maple Forest, Maple Grove, Marilla, Marion, Markey, Meade, Middle Branch, Mills, Nester, Newkirk, Norman, Norwich, Ogemaw, Oliver, Onekama, Orange, Orient, Osceola, Peacock, Pinora, Pioneer, Platte, Pleasant Plains, Pleasanton, Rapid River, Reeder, Richfield, Richland, Richland, Richmond, Riverside, Riverton, Roscommon, Rose, Rose Lake, Sauble, Selma, Sheridan, Sherman, Sherman, Slagle, Solon, South Branch, South Branch, Springdale, Springfield, Springville, Stronach, Summit, Suttons Bay, Sweetwater, Sylvan, Victory, Webber, Weldon, West Branch, West Branch, Wexford, Yates
Unincorporated Places:
Arcadia, Bear Lake, Bendon, Boon, Brethren, Caberfae, Cedar, Crystal Downs Country Club, Crystal Mountain, Filer City, Glen Arbor, Greilickville, Hardwood Acres, Haring, Houghton Lake, Jennings, Lake Leelanau, Leland, Lupton, Manistee Lake, Maple City, Maple Grove, Nessen City, Oak Hill, Omena, Parkdale, Pilgrim, Prudenville, Rapid City, Skidway Lake, South Boardman, St. Helen, Stronach, Wedgewood, Wellston
Villages:
Baldwin, Bear Lake, Benzonia, Beulah, Buckley, Copemish, Custer, Eastlake, Elberta, Empire, Fountain, Free Soil, Harrietta, Hersey, Honor, Kaleva, Kalkaska, Lake Ann, Le Roy, Luther, Marion, Mesick, Northport, Onekama, Prescott, Roscommon, Suttons Bay, Thompsonville, Tustin
Congressional Districts:
MI-1, MI-2, MI-4
State House Districts:
MI-97, MI-100, MI-101, MI-102, MI-103
Unified School Districts:
Baldwin, Bear Lake, Benzie County, Buckley, Cadillac, Chippewa Hills, Crawford AuSable, Elk Rapids, Evart, Forest Area, Frankfort-Elberta, Glen Lake, Hale, Houghton Lake, Kaleva Norman Dickson, Kalkaska, Kingsley, Lake City, Leland, Ludington, Mancelona, Manistee, Manton, Marion, Mason County Central, Mason County Eastern, McBain, Mesick, Northport, Onekama, Pentwater, Pine River, Reed City, Roscommon, Suttons Bay, Traverse City, Walkerville Rural, West Branch-Rose City, Whittemore-Prescott
Elementary School District:
Excelsior Township 1
ZIP Codes:
48610, 48624, 48627, 48629, 48630, 48632, 48635, 48651, 48653, 48654, 48656, 48661, 48739, 48756, 48761, 49304, 49309, 49338, 49402, 49405, 49410, 49411, 49431, 49449, 49454, 49458, 49601, 49612, 49613, 49614, 49616, 49617, 49618, 49619, 49620, 49621, 49623, 49625, 49626, 49628, 49630, 49631, 49632, 49633, 49634, 49635, 49636, 49638, 49639, 49640, 49642, 49643, 49644, 49645, 49646, 49649, 49650, 49651, 49653, 49654, 49655, 49656, 49657, 49659, 49660, 49663, 49664, 49665, 49667, 49668, 49670, 49674, 49675, 49676, 49677, 49679, 49680, 49682, 49683, 49684, 49688, 49689, 49690, 49733, 49738, 49756
Neighboring State Senate Districts:
MI-33, MI-34, MI-36, MI-37, MI-38, WI-1, WI-9