Marital Status in State Senate District 35, Michigan (State Senate District)

Marital Status#1

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
Female Male
Michigan
State Senate District 35
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedMarriedSeparated/DivorcedWidowed-19.641565%-29.997089%-19.641565%20%19.641565%7.688613%29.997089%6.060515%27.330178%27%20,63720.6k28,75928.8k-53.842274%-46.631047%-53.842274%54%53.842274%0.317266%46.631047%2.778150%54.159539%54%56,57156.6k56,99157.0k-14.877219%-0.506152%-11.783011%-2.359012%-15.383371%15%14.877219%11.783011%14.877219%15%16,16316.2k15,65515.7k-3.633063%-7.499727%-2.750188%-6.479654%-11.132790%11%3.633063%2.750188%3.633063%4%11,69711.7k3,823
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

Detailed Marital Status#2

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
Female Male
Michigan
State Senate District 35
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
40%20%0%20%40%FMNever MarriedNow MarriedSeparatedAbsent SpouseWidowedDivorced-19.641565%-29.997089%-19.641565%20%19.641565%7.688613%29.997089%6.060515%27.330178%27%20,63720.6k28,75928.8k-51.762668%-44.935835%-51.762668%52%51.762668%0.241551%44.935835%2.531926%52.004219%52%54,38654.4k54,72354.7k-1.075759%-0.117753%-1.206320%-0.339268%-1.193513%1%1.075759%1.206320%1.075759%1%1,2541,132-2.079606%-1.695212%-2.079606%2%2.079606%0.075714%1.695212%0.246224%2.155320%2%2,1852,268-3.633063%-7.499727%-2.750188%-6.479654%-11.132790%11%3.633063%2.750188%3.633063%4%11,69711.7k3,823-13.801460%-0.388398%-10.576690%-2.019743%-14.189858%14%13.801460%10.576690%13.801460%14%14,90914.9k14,52314.5k
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

The Married by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1720.844%20.8%56.835%56.8%49.235%49.2%74.252%74.3%64.652%64.7%75.399%75.4%69.538%69.5%69.530%69.5%65.791%65.8%63.252%63.3%67.032%67.0%59.747%59.7%62.811%62.8%58.183%58.2%63.816%63.8%57.599%57.6%60.431%60.4%53.017%53.0%56.723%56.7%48.468%48.5%43.554%43.6%29.888%29.9%17.271%17.3%9.879%9.88%2.559%2.56%1.301%1.30%0.863%0.86%0.561%0.56%
F percentage of married females in age cohort
M percentage of married males in age cohort

The Divorced1 by Sex and Age#5

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
Female
Male
0%5%10%15%20%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 177.090%7.09%5.917%5.92%9.785%9.79%9.599%9.60%13.382%13.4%14.858%14.9%18.720%18.7%21.190%21.2%21.022%21.0%23.285%23.3%22.476%22.5%24.869%24.9%23.750%23.8%22.926%22.9%22.738%22.7%20.313%20.3%22.773%22.8%16.910%16.9%15.736%15.7%11.785%11.8%9.288%9.29%3.456%3.46%3.065%3.06%0.691%0.69%0.777%0.78%0.074%0.07%0.177%0.18%0.332%0.33%
F percentage of divorced females in age cohort
M percentage of divorced males in age cohort
1and Separated

The Never Married by Sex and Age#6

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 172.071%2.07%2.420%2.42%1.442%1.44%2.527%2.53%2.895%2.90%3.878%3.88%3.330%3.33%6.199%6.20%7.345%7.35%10.682%10.7%6.409%6.41%13.906%13.9%11.555%11.6%18.301%18.3%11.573%11.6%21.641%21.6%15.673%15.7%29.581%29.6%27.054%27.1%39.407%39.4%47.000%47.0%66.380%66.4%79.665%79.7%89.268%89.3%95.430%95.4%98.625%98.6%98.960%99.0%98.899%98.9%
F percentage of never married females in age cohort
M percentage of never married males in age cohort

The Widowed by Sex and Age#7

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1769.995%70.0%34.827%34.8%39.538%39.5%13.621%13.6%19.070%19.1%5.864%5.86%8.412%8.41%3.080%3.08%5.842%5.84%2.780%2.78%4.083%4.08%1.477%1.48%1.884%1.88%0.591%0.59%1.873%1.87%0.447%0.45%1.122%1.12%0.492%0.49%0.487%0.49%0.340%0.34%0.157%0.16%0.276%0.28%0.000%0%0.162%0.16%1.234%1.23%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.208%0.21%
F percentage of widowed females in age cohort
M percentage of widowed males in age cohort

The Married by Age#8

Percentage of age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the upper state legislative districts in Michigan.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
State Senate District 35
Michigan
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%Count85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 172,05310,73110.7k23,29623.3k14,45214.5k13,88413.9k12,18112.2k9,4298,0866,7866,4834,3321,6929166
Count number of married in age cohort in State Senate District 35

Marital Status by Race#9

Percentage of each ethno-racial group.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 35
State Senate District 35
Michigan
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Married
Never Married
50%0%50%CountAsian2White1Other2White HispanicMixed2Black2-23.348519%-0.911162%-3.416856%-31.533651%-0.545272%-3.702842%-27.676538%28%67.995444%4.328018%60.836114%3.382120%72.323462%72%878-22.224464%-1.088722%-14.095876%-28.404956%-1.009921%-11.788890%-37.409063%37%55.007719%7.583218%52.395394%6.400839%62.590937%63%198,214198k-32.101617%-2.424942%-14.280216%-39.832515%-2.679443%-11.428023%-48.806774%49%47.113164%4.080062%42.539952%3.520068%51.193226%51%2,598-46.862189%-1.766004%-9.303059%-43.045654%-2.025080%-9.506242%-57.931252%58%39.861243%2.207506%42.359085%3.063938%42.068748%42%3,171-42.932109%-1.344703%-14.824533%-54.604964%-1.759718%-10.417404%-59.101345%59%36.011807%4.886848%30.020725%3.197190%40.898655%41%3,049-63.285834%-2.514669%-14.417435%-53.580862%-3.364937%-12.843388%-80.217938%80%14.501257%5.280805%24.149425%6.061389%19.782062%20%2,386
Count number of people of given race
1non-Hispanic 2including Hispanic

Map of Marital Status by County in State Senate District 35

Married Marital Status by County#10

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
46.5%49.4%52.2%55.0%57.8%60.7%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County#11

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
11.2%12.6%14.0%15.3%16.7%18.1%

Widowed Marital Status by County#12

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
5.8%6.7%7.5%8.3%9.1%10.0%

Never Married Marital Status by County#13

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
19.5%21.2%22.8%24.3%25.9%27.5%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 35

Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#14

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
29%40%51%62%73%84%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County Subdivision#15

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
5.7%10.7%15.6%20.5%25.4%30.4%

Widowed Marital Status by County Subdivision#16

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
0.0%4.0%8.0%12.0%16.0%20.0%

Never Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#17

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
0%8%15%23%31%39%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Tract in State Senate District 35

Married Marital Status by Tract#18

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
35%42%49%56%62%69%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Tract#19

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
6.1%9.6%13.1%16.5%20.0%23.5%

Widowed Marital Status by Tract#20

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
4.4%6.5%8.5%10.6%12.6%14.7%

Never Married Marital Status by Tract#21

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
11%17%23%28%34%40%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Block Group in State Senate District 35

Married Marital Status by Block Group#22

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
14%27%40%53%66%79%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Block Group#23

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
5%11%17%22%28%34%

Widowed Marital Status by Block Group#24

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
1%7%12%17%22%28%

Never Married Marital Status by Block Group#25

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
6%16%26%36%46%56%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Marital Status by Place in State Senate District 35

There are 78 places that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 35 (77 fully and 1 partially). This section compares the 50 most populous of those to each other, State Senate District 35, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35. The least populous of the compared places has a population of 262.

Married by Place#26

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected places in State Senate District 35, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%20%40%60%Count#GreilickvilleBear LakeSuttons BayNorthportEastlakeRapid CityBrethrenBuckleyOak HillLuptonLe RoyMI-35CusterFrankfortHerseyMarionKalevaMidwestManistee LakeOnekamaEast North CentralCadillacUnited StatesMichiganParkdaleHoughton LakeEmpireMesickPrudenvilleLudingtonLelandS BoardmanSt. HelenMcBainTraverse CityManisteePrescottLake CityKalkaskaLutherSkidway LakeWellstonScottvilleMantonHardwood AcresThompsonvilleEvartBenzoniaGraylingWest BranchRose CityRoscommonHaringReed CityBaldwin66.362079%66.362079%66%1,162165.306122%65.306122%65%224262.790698%62.790698%63%297362.574257%62.574257%63%316461.953728%61.953728%62%241560.964019%60.964019%61%898657.142857%57.142857%57%188755.597723%55.597723%56%293854.943274%54.943274%55%339954.863813%54.863813%55%1411054.044118%54.044118%54%1471154.001027%54.001027%54%113,562114k53.846154%53.846154%54%1121252.693603%52.693603%53%6261351.200000%51.200000%51%1281450.949914%50.949914%51%2951549.403341%49.403341%49%2071649.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M49.367089%49.367089%49%1561748.882682%48.882682%49%1751848.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.346706%48.346706%48%3,9771948.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M47.491039%47.491039%47%2652047.435468%47.435468%47%1,4152146.268657%46.268657%46%1552245.783133%45.783133%46%1522345.683931%45.683931%46%6882445.291005%45.291005%45%2,9962545.253165%45.253165%45%1432644.638950%44.638950%45%2042744.489796%44.489796%44%1,0902844.014085%44.014085%44%2502943.322300%43.322300%43%5,6283042.662935%42.662935%43%2,1343142.259414%42.259414%42%1013242.082739%42.082739%42%2953340.870548%40.870548%41%7233439.568345%39.568345%40%1103539.399487%39.399487%39%1,0763639.183673%39.183673%39%963738.755020%38.755020%39%3863838.411317%38.411317%38%3533937.924152%37.924152%38%1904037.393162%37.393162%37%1754137.104430%37.104430%37%4694236.060606%36.060606%36%1194335.719019%35.719019%36%5394435.706580%35.706580%36%6624530.769231%30.769231%31%1444630.403800%30.403800%30%2564730.000000%30.000000%30%1294829.079696%29.079696%29%6134923.108218%23.108218%23%28450
Count number of this marital status
# rank of place out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Metro Area in State Senate District 35

There are 3 metro areas that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 35 (2 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 3 of those to each other, State Senate District 35, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35.

Married by Metro Area#30

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected metro areas in State Senate District 35, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%10%20%30%40%50%Count#Cadillac AreaLudingtonMI-35Traverse CityMidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichigan55.120380%55.120380%55%21,22321.2k154.583525%54.583525%55%13,03413.0k254.001027%54.001027%54%113,562114k53.505322%53.505322%54%65,70465.7k349.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M
Count number of this marital status
# rank of metro area out of 3 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County in State Senate District 35

There are 12 counties in State Senate District 35. This section compares all 12 of those to each other, State Senate District 35, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35.

Married by County#34

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected counties in State Senate District 35, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%20%40%60%Count#LeelanauMissaukeeCrawfordKalkaskaOgemawBenzieMasonWexfordMI-35RoscommonOsceolaManisteeMidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganLake60.659399%60.659399%61%11,40711.4k157.378129%57.378129%57%6,968255.097540%55.097540%55%6,496355.060529%55.060529%55%7,823454.805224%54.805224%55%9,820554.703407%54.703407%55%8,060654.583525%54.583525%55%13,03413.0k754.080200%54.080200%54%14,25514.3k854.001027%54.001027%54%113,562114k53.057425%53.057425%53%11,11511.1k950.806151%50.806151%51%9,5481050.083864%50.083864%50%10,45110.5k1149.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M46.548223%46.548223%47%4,58512
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county out of 12 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 35

There are 175 county subdivisions in State Senate District 35. This section compares the 50 most populous of those to each other, State Senate District 35, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 1,489.

Married by County Subdivision#38

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected county subdivisions in State Senate District 35, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%20%40%60%Count#LeelanauClam LkCherry GrvHamlinElmwoodW BranchClearwaterChurchillLincolnCedar CrkFilerGerrishLake TownshipPere MarquetteBinghamS BranchGraylingBear LkAmberMarkeyBeaver CrkInlandHanoverLelandSolonAlmiraSuttons BaySpringvilleRichmondMI-35SelmaDentonHerseyRoscommonBenzoniaMidwestHaringEast North CentralCadillacMarionUnited StatesRichfieldMichiganKalkaskaHomesteadMillsLudingtonManisteeHigginsManisteeEvartGraylingWest BranchPleasant PlainsReed City69.230769%69.230769%69%1,350167.426710%67.426710%67%1,242264.536199%64.536199%65%1,141363.882469%63.882469%64%1,935461.634757%61.634757%62%2,511560.957552%60.957552%61%1,235660.815047%60.815047%61%1,358760.251665%60.251665%60%814859.747435%59.747435%60%757959.341446%59.341446%59%8291059.159434%59.159434%59%1,2951158.916479%58.916479%59%1,5661258.813631%58.813631%59%1,3981358.510113%58.510113%59%1,1861458.309859%58.309859%58%1,2421558.172232%58.172232%58%9931658.105046%58.105046%58%2,8211757.853589%57.853589%58%8141857.723949%57.723949%58%1,2631957.384615%57.384615%57%1,1192057.368060%57.368060%57%8372157.258567%57.258567%57%9192257.221711%57.221711%57%6222357.098381%57.098381%57%9172455.718475%55.718475%56%7602555.567190%55.567190%56%1,5922655.542217%55.542217%56%1,3882755.180180%55.180180%55%7352854.200743%54.200743%54%7292954.001027%54.001027%54%113,562114k53.962645%53.962645%54%1,0693053.630025%53.630025%54%2,6153152.764505%52.764505%53%7733249.716139%49.716139%50%1,8393349.573015%49.573015%50%1,1613449.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.825257%48.825257%49%1,3303548.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.346706%48.346706%48%3,9773648.072190%48.072190%48%5863748.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M48.036810%48.036810%48%1,5663847.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M47.556833%47.556833%48%1,8203946.825800%46.825800%47%9224046.245983%46.245983%46%1,5834145.291005%45.291005%45%2,9964242.662935%42.662935%43%2,1344340.514076%40.514076%41%6624439.428263%39.428263%39%1,4624537.104430%37.104430%37%4694635.719019%35.719019%36%5394735.706580%35.706580%36%6624835.255136%35.255136%35%5324929.079696%29.079696%29%61350
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Upper State Legislative District in Michigan

There are 38 upper state legislative districts in Michigan. This section compares State Senate District 35 to all of the upper state legislative districts in Michigan and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35.

Married by Upper State Legislative District#42

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected other upper state legislative districts in Michigan, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%20%40%Count#MI-22MI-15MI-7MI-30MI-36MI-13MI-10MI-25MI-35MI-24MI-14MI-31MI-26MI-28MI-37MI-21MI-8MI-17MI-12MI-19MI-34MidwestMI-16MI-38MI-32East North CentralUnited StatesMichiganMI-29MI-20MI-33MI-6MI-11MI-9MI-18MI-27MI-23MI-5MI-3MI-2MI-4MI-159.994051%59.994051%60%127,059127k158.554284%58.554284%59%127,492127k256.357978%56.357978%56%124,058124k356.312530%56.312530%56%123,771124k455.504035%55.504035%56%113,957114k554.690653%54.690653%55%127,106127k654.482051%54.482051%54%125,926126k754.023656%54.023656%54%116,334116k854.001027%54.001027%54%113,562114k953.981621%53.981621%54%119,484119k1053.271894%53.271894%53%108,672109k1153.095579%53.095579%53%109,070109k1253.054170%53.054170%53%112,495112k1352.964294%52.964294%53%113,074113k1452.854850%52.854850%53%112,945113k1552.100891%52.100891%52%113,321113k1651.564194%51.564194%52%118,428118k1751.546366%51.546366%52%105,035105k1851.270760%51.270760%51%108,633109k1950.382878%50.382878%50%105,272105k2049.602997%49.602997%50%98,39398.4k2149.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M49.362517%49.362517%49%100,315100k2249.128861%49.128861%49%104,784105k2348.610539%48.610539%49%103,766104k2448.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M45.134293%45.134293%45%100,524101k2544.479473%44.479473%44%93,96694.0k2644.091594%44.091594%44%91,88691.9k2743.574016%43.574016%44%92,63492.6k2843.544016%43.544016%44%100,571101k2940.475678%40.475678%40%90,17990.2k3039.461139%39.461139%39%94,86394.9k3138.225576%38.225576%38%75,08075.1k3237.291403%37.291403%37%83,57683.6k3334.534543%34.534543%35%71,58771.6k3434.028219%34.028219%34%64,29764.3k3533.170627%33.170627%33%61,56861.6k3632.687623%32.687623%33%63,19463.2k3730.503459%30.503459%31%63,39963.4k38
Count number of this marital status
# rank of upper state legislative district out of 38 by percentage of this marital status

Definitions

This page reports on the marital status of the residents of State Senate District 35 aged 15 and older. The following definitions are used in this page:

  • Never Married: a person over the age of 15 that has never been married
  • Married: married and not separated at the time of the survey, including cases where one spouse is absent for reasons other than a separation
  • Separated: including legal and de-facto separations for reasons of marital discord
  • Divorced: and not remarried at the time of the survey
  • Widowed: and not remarried at the time of the survey

These definition were taken directly from the US Census Bureau, and reflect the marital status at the time of the survey.

For additional information about the data presented on this site, including our sources, please see the About Page.

More Topics to Explore

Demographics

Income

Education

More Maps to Explore

State:
Michigan
Counties:
Benzie, Crawford, Kalkaska, Lake, Leelanau, Manistee, Mason, Missaukee, Ogemaw, Osceola, Roscommon, Wexford
Metro Areas:
Cadillac Area, Ludington Area, Traverse City Area
Charter Townships:
Elmwood, Filer, Grayling, Haring, Pere Marquette
Cities:
Cadillac, Evart, Frankfort, Grayling, Lake City, Ludington, Manistee, Manton, McBain, Reed City, Rose City, Scottville, Traverse City, West Branch
Townships:
Aetna, Almira, Amber, Antioch, Arcadia, Au Sable, Backus, Bear Lake, Bear Lake, Beaver Creek, Benzonia, Bingham, Blaine, Bloomfield, Blue Lake, Boardman, Boon, Branch, Brown, Burdell, Butterfield, Caldwell, Cedar, Cedar Creek, Centerville, Chase, Cherry Grove, Cherry Valley, Churchill, Clam Lake, Clam Union, Clearwater, Cleon, Cleveland, Coldsprings, Colfax, Colfax, Crystal Lake, Cumming, Custer, Denton, Dickson, Dover, Eden, Eden, Edwards, Elk, Ellsworth, Empire, Enterprise, Evart, Excelsior, Forest, Foster, Frederic, Free Soil, Garfield, Gerrish, Gilmore, Glen Arbor, Goodar, Grant, Greenwood, Hamlin, Hanover, Hartwick, Henderson, Hersey, Higgins, Highland, Hill, Holland, Homestead, Horton, Inland, Joyfield, Kalkaska, Kasson, Klacking, Lake, Lake, Lake, Lake, Le Roy, Leelanau, Leland, Liberty, Lincoln, Logan, Logan, Lovells, Lyon, Manistee, Maple Forest, Maple Grove, Marilla, Marion, Markey, Meade, Middle Branch, Mills, Nester, Newkirk, Norman, Norwich, Ogemaw, Oliver, Onekama, Orange, Orient, Osceola, Peacock, Pinora, Pioneer, Platte, Pleasant Plains, Pleasanton, Rapid River, Reeder, Richfield, Richland, Richland, Richmond, Riverside, Riverton, Roscommon, Rose, Rose Lake, Sauble, Selma, Sheridan, Sherman, Sherman, Slagle, Solon, South Branch, South Branch, Springdale, Springfield, Springville, Stronach, Summit, Suttons Bay, Sweetwater, Sylvan, Victory, Webber, Weldon, West Branch, West Branch, Wexford, Yates
Unincorporated Places:
Arcadia, Bear Lake, Bendon, Boon, Brethren, Caberfae, Cedar, Crystal Downs Country Club, Crystal Mountain, Filer City, Glen Arbor, Greilickville, Hardwood Acres, Haring, Houghton Lake, Jennings, Lake Leelanau, Leland, Lupton, Manistee Lake, Maple City, Maple Grove, Nessen City, Oak Hill, Omena, Parkdale, Pilgrim, Prudenville, Rapid City, Skidway Lake, South Boardman, St. Helen, Stronach, Wedgewood, Wellston
Villages:
Baldwin, Bear Lake, Benzonia, Beulah, Buckley, Copemish, Custer, Eastlake, Elberta, Empire, Fountain, Free Soil, Harrietta, Hersey, Honor, Kaleva, Kalkaska, Lake Ann, Le Roy, Luther, Marion, Mesick, Northport, Onekama, Prescott, Roscommon, Suttons Bay, Thompsonville, Tustin
Congressional Districts:
MI-1, MI-2, MI-4
State House Districts:
MI-97, MI-100, MI-101, MI-102, MI-103
Unified School Districts:
Baldwin, Bear Lake, Benzie County, Buckley, Cadillac, Chippewa Hills, Crawford AuSable, Elk Rapids, Evart, Forest Area, Frankfort-Elberta, Glen Lake, Hale, Houghton Lake, Kaleva Norman Dickson, Kalkaska, Kingsley, Lake City, Leland, Ludington, Mancelona, Manistee, Manton, Marion, Mason County Central, Mason County Eastern, McBain, Mesick, Northport, Onekama, Pentwater, Pine River, Reed City, Roscommon, Suttons Bay, Traverse City, Walkerville Rural, West Branch-Rose City, Whittemore-Prescott
Elementary School District:
Excelsior Township 1
ZIP Codes:
48610, 48624, 48627, 48629, 48630, 48632, 48635, 48651, 48653, 48654, 48656, 48661, 48739, 48756, 48761, 49304, 49309, 49338, 49402, 49405, 49410, 49411, 49431, 49449, 49454, 49458, 49601, 49612, 49613, 49614, 49616, 49617, 49618, 49619, 49620, 49621, 49623, 49625, 49626, 49628, 49630, 49631, 49632, 49633, 49634, 49635, 49636, 49638, 49639, 49640, 49642, 49643, 49644, 49645, 49646, 49649, 49650, 49651, 49653, 49654, 49655, 49656, 49657, 49659, 49660, 49663, 49664, 49665, 49667, 49668, 49670, 49674, 49675, 49676, 49677, 49679, 49680, 49682, 49683, 49684, 49688, 49689, 49690, 49733, 49738, 49756
Neighboring State Senate Districts:
MI-33, MI-34, MI-36, MI-37, MI-38, WI-1, WI-9