Marital Status in State Senate District 29, North Dakota (State Senate District)

Marital Status#1

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of North Dakota and State Senate District 29
Female Male
North Dakota
State Senate District 29
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedMarriedSeparated/DivorcedWidowed-17.314286%-27.252592%-17.314286%17%17.314286%10.530664%27.252592%9.049604%27.844950%28%9091,566-57.645804%-3.801815%-51.461312%-1.049081%-61.447619%61%57.645804%51.461312%57.645804%58%3,2263,242-9.580952%-9.892740%-1.020303%-9.580952%10%9.580952%2.190029%9.892740%11.770982%12%503662-2.738265%-8.918878%-2.343753%-6.980220%-11.657143%12%2.738265%2.343753%2.738265%3%612154
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

Detailed Marital Status#2

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of North Dakota and State Senate District 29
Female Male
North Dakota
State Senate District 29
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedNow MarriedSeparatedAbsent SpouseWidowedDivorced-17.314286%-27.252592%-17.314286%17%17.314286%10.530664%27.252592%9.049604%27.844950%28%9091,566-56.098862%-4.720186%-48.989031%-1.846732%-60.819048%61%56.098862%48.989031%56.098862%56%3,1933,155-0.462304%-0.071029%-0.829024%-0.078326%-0.533333%1%0.462304%0.829024%0.462304%0%2826-0.628571%-1.674630%-0.628571%1%0.628571%0.918370%1.674630%0.797651%1.546942%2%3387-2.738265%-8.918878%-2.343753%-6.980220%-11.657143%12%2.738265%2.343753%2.738265%3%612154-9.047619%-9.063715%-0.941977%-9.047619%9%9.047619%2.261058%9.063715%11.308677%11%475636
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

The Married by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of North Dakota and State Senate District 29
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1710.268%10.3%64.539%64.5%54.167%54.2%75.166%75.2%64.932%64.9%77.711%77.7%87.124%87.1%76.621%76.6%83.824%83.8%66.667%66.7%81.967%82.0%62.541%62.5%73.282%73.3%66.387%66.4%67.949%67.9%73.373%73.4%72.312%72.3%58.578%58.6%73.832%73.8%74.766%74.8%55.973%56.0%27.614%27.6%17.460%17.5%7.292%7.29%0.000%0%3.784%3.78%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of married females in age cohort
M percentage of married males in age cohort

The Divorced1 by Sex and Age#5

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of North Dakota and State Senate District 29
Female
Male
0%5%10%15%20%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 178.929%8.93%1.418%1.42%4.167%4.17%8.204%8.20%9.452%9.45%13.705%13.7%4.936%4.94%15.128%15.1%10.504%10.5%20.794%20.8%13.297%13.3%24.267%24.3%8.397%8.40%15.406%15.4%21.474%21.5%4.438%4.44%17.473%17.5%14.706%14.7%15.888%15.9%4.984%4.98%8.191%8.19%7.775%7.77%3.175%3.17%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of divorced females in age cohort
M percentage of divorced males in age cohort
1and Separated

The Never Married by Sex and Age#6

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of North Dakota and State Senate District 29
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 171.786%1.79%0.000%0%1.042%1.04%5.543%5.54%1.918%1.92%3.163%3.16%1.502%1.50%6.876%6.88%2.101%2.10%10.635%10.6%4.372%4.37%13.029%13.0%13.740%13.7%18.207%18.2%10.577%10.6%22.189%22.2%10.215%10.2%26.716%26.7%10.280%10.3%20.249%20.2%35.836%35.8%64.611%64.6%79.365%79.4%92.708%92.7%100.000%100%96.216%96.2%100.000%100%100.000%100%
F percentage of never married females in age cohort
M percentage of never married males in age cohort

The Widowed by Sex and Age#7

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of North Dakota and State Senate District 29
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1779.018%79.0%34.043%34.0%40.625%40.6%11.086%11.1%23.699%23.7%5.422%5.42%6.438%6.44%1.375%1.38%3.571%3.57%1.905%1.90%0.364%0.36%0.163%0.16%4.580%4.58%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of widowed females in age cohort
M percentage of widowed males in age cohort

The Married by Age#8

Percentage of age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the upper state legislative districts in North Dakota.
Scope: population of North Dakota and State Senate District 29
State Senate District 29
North Dakota
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%20%40%60%80%Count85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 171145999907968198345254605084772677270
Count number of married in age cohort in State Senate District 29

Marital Status by Race#9

Percentage of each ethno-racial group.
Scope: population of North Dakota and State Senate District 29
State Senate District 29
North Dakota
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Married
Never Married
50%0%50%CountWhite HispanicWhite1Asian2Other2Mixed2Black2-26.415094%-44.152720%-0.334728%-8.619247%-26.415094%26%58.490566%-0.000000%15.094340%-0.000000%45.658996%1.234310%73.584906%74%53-22.418990%-0.470987%-10.305200%-29.648553%-0.758407%-9.472563%-33.195177%33%59.900151%6.904672%53.986543%6.133934%66.804823%67%10,61610.6k-41.176471%-37.560656%-0.445902%-6.308197%-41.176471%41%58.823529%-0.000000%0.000000%-0.000000%53.009836%2.675410%58.823529%59%51-20.895522%-5.970149%-17.910448%-49.977123%-1.751748%-13.004118%-44.776119%45%32.835821%22.388060%31.554350%3.712661%55.223881%55%67-54.761905%-3.571429%-52.287963%-2.292820%-10.065093%-58.333333%58%29.761905%-0.000000%11.904762%33.100165%2.253959%41.666667%42%84-66.666667%-54.532322%-3.006501%-4.803178%-66.666667%67%-0.000000%33.333333%-0.000000%0.000000%35.238353%2.419646%33.333333%33%3
Count number of people of given race
1non-Hispanic 2including Hispanic

Map of Marital Status by County in State Senate District 29

Married Marital Status by County#10

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
49.4%52.4%55.3%58.2%61.1%64.1%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County#11

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
8.2%9.3%10.3%11.4%12.4%13.5%

Widowed Marital Status by County#12

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
7.29%7.44%7.59%7.73%7.87%8.02%

Never Married Marital Status by County#13

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
19.5%21.6%23.6%25.7%27.7%29.9%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 29

Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#14

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
0%20%40%60%80%100%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County Subdivision#15

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
0%20%40%60%80%100%

Widowed Marital Status by County Subdivision#16

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
0%11%21%32%42%53%

Never Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#17

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
0%16%31%47%62%78%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Tract in State Senate District 29

Married Marital Status by Tract#18

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
32%39%46%53%60%67%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Tract#19

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
7.5%10.6%13.7%16.8%19.9%23.0%

Widowed Marital Status by Tract#20

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
5.1%6.1%7.0%7.9%8.9%9.8%

Never Married Marital Status by Tract#21

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
17.1%20.7%24.3%27.9%31.5%35.2%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Block Group in State Senate District 29

Married Marital Status by Block Group#22

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
15%28%39%51%63%75%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Block Group#23

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
6%13%20%27%34%42%

Widowed Marital Status by Block Group#24

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
3.5%5.4%7.2%9.1%10.9%12.8%

Never Married Marital Status by Block Group#25

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
11%19%27%35%42%50%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Marital Status by Place in State Senate District 29

There are 23 places that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 29 (22 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 23 of those to each other, State Senate District 29, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 29.

Married by Place#26

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 29, selected places in State Senate District 29, and entities that contain State Senate District 29
0%50%100%Count#SpiritwoodSpiritwood LkDickeyBuchananJudMcHenryClevelandMarionLaMoureND-29GlenfieldCarringtonBerlinPingreeMontpelierNorth DakotaWest North CentralVeronaMedinaMidwestUnited StatesCourtenayJamestownStreeterKensalGrace CityWoodworthYpsilanti100.000000%100.000000%100%8175.490196%75.490196%75%77273.076923%73.076923%73%19372.340426%72.340426%72%34470.491803%70.491803%70%43568.493151%68.493151%68%50664.864865%64.864865%65%48760.526316%60.526316%61%69860.208644%60.208644%60%404959.481332%59.481332%59%6,46859.375000%59.375000%59%381057.797101%57.797101%58%9971157.142857%57.142857%57%161255.263158%55.263158%55%211354.081633%54.081633%54%531451.973175%51.973175%52%308,756309k51.461869%51.461869%51%8,666,3128.67M50.793651%50.793651%51%321550.643777%50.643777%51%1181649.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M46.875000%46.875000%47%151744.495660%44.495660%44%5,7921844.186047%44.186047%44%381938.095238%38.095238%38%642037.500000%37.500000%38%212137.500000%37.500000%38%122221.978022%21.978022%22%2023
Count number of this marital status
# rank of place out of 23 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Metro Area in State Senate District 29

There is 1 metro area that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 29 (0 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 1 of those to each other, State Senate District 29, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 29.

Married by Metro Area#30

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 29, selected metro areas in State Senate District 29, and entities that contain State Senate District 29
0%20%40%Count#ND-29North DakotaWest North CentralJamestownMidwestUnited States59.481332%59.481332%59%6,46851.973175%51.973175%52%308,756309k51.461869%51.461869%51%8,666,3128.67M49.430718%49.430718%49%8,683149.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M
Count number of this marital status
# rank of metro area out of 1 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County in State Senate District 29

There are 3 counties that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 29 (1 fully and 2 partially). This section compares all 3 of those to each other, State Senate District 29, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 29.

Married by County#34

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 29, selected counties in State Senate District 29, and entities that contain State Senate District 29
0%20%40%60%Count#LaMoureFosterND-29North DakotaWest North CentralStutsmanMidwestUnited States64.079103%64.079103%64%2,171161.951396%61.951396%62%1,708259.481332%59.481332%59%6,46851.973175%51.973175%52%308,756309k51.461869%51.461869%51%8,666,3128.67M49.430718%49.430718%49%8,683349.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county out of 3 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 29

There are 129 county subdivisions that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 29 (127 fully and 2 partially). This section compares the 50 most populous of those to each other, State Senate District 29, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 29. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 64.

Married by County Subdivision#38

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 29, selected county subdivisions in State Senate District 29, and entities that contain State Senate District 29
0%50%100%Count#BadgerMelvilleFloranceCourtenayCarringtonCusatorWinfieldStirtonHomerSheridanSevernSpiritwood LkHenriettaSharlowFriedJudMcHenryBuchananMannsClevelandBucephaliaGrand RapidsMidwayMontpelierWyardAdrianSt. PaulDean TownshipMarionLaMoureND-29GlenfieldCarringtonBloomCorwinLongviewMontpelierNorth DakotaKennisonWest North CentralYpsilantiVeronaMedinaEldridgeMidwestUnited StatesJamestownStreeterSydneyWillowbankKensalGrace CityRose HlEstabrookWoodbury100.000000%100.000000%100%461100.000000%100.000000%100%692100.000000%100.000000%100%46392.000000%92.000000%92%46491.503268%91.503268%92%140587.037037%87.037037%87%47683.606557%83.606557%84%51782.352941%82.352941%82%70881.735160%81.735160%82%179980.952381%80.952381%81%511080.434783%80.434783%80%371175.490196%75.490196%75%771274.576271%74.576271%75%441371.428571%71.428571%71%351470.629371%70.629371%71%1011570.491803%70.491803%70%431668.493151%68.493151%68%501766.666667%66.666667%67%361866.666667%66.666667%67%361964.864865%64.864865%65%482064.705882%64.705882%65%332164.406780%64.406780%64%382263.985375%63.985375%64%3502363.157895%63.157895%63%362462.820513%62.820513%63%492562.500000%62.500000%63%552662.162162%62.162162%62%462760.714286%60.714286%61%1022860.526316%60.526316%61%692960.208644%60.208644%60%4043059.481332%59.481332%59%6,46859.375000%59.375000%59%383157.797101%57.797101%58%9973257.618214%57.618214%58%3293356.060606%56.060606%56%373454.285714%54.285714%54%383554.081633%54.081633%54%533651.973175%51.973175%52%308,756309k51.748252%51.748252%52%743751.461869%51.461869%51%8,666,3128.67M51.327434%51.327434%51%583850.793651%50.793651%51%323950.643777%50.643777%51%1184050.000000%50.000000%50%344149.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M44.495660%44.495660%44%5,7924244.186047%44.186047%44%384343.181818%43.181818%43%194442.241379%42.241379%42%494538.095238%38.095238%38%644637.500000%37.500000%38%214733.009709%33.009709%33%344832.000000%32.000000%32%164922.222222%22.222222%22%2050
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Upper State Legislative District in North Dakota

There are 47 upper state legislative districts in North Dakota. This section compares State Senate District 29 to all of the upper state legislative districts in North Dakota and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 29.

Married by Upper State Legislative District#42

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 29, selected other upper state legislative districts in North Dakota, and entities that contain State Senate District 29
0%20%40%60%Count#ND-8ND-22ND-33ND-7ND-36ND-14ND-10ND-17ND-20ND-26ND-28ND-19ND-29ND-6ND-38ND-13ND-39ND-24ND-47ND-2ND-34ND-31ND-25North DakotaND-41ND-3ND-1ND-23West North CentralND-15MidwestND-37ND-27ND-4United StatesND-35ND-5ND-46ND-12ND-44ND-40ND-30ND-32ND-45ND-43ND-18ND-16ND-11ND-9ND-21ND-4269.298320%69.298320%69%8,207168.139162%68.139162%68%8,931265.210300%65.210300%65%7,597364.634409%64.634409%65%8,990462.551898%62.551898%63%8,437562.245822%62.245822%62%7,561662.134503%62.134503%62%7,225762.049133%62.049133%62%7,552862.018712%62.018712%62%6,894961.946024%61.946024%62%6,8631061.916115%61.916115%62%7,0121159.914813%59.914813%60%6,3301259.481332%59.481332%59%6,4681359.372453%59.372453%59%7,2851458.797004%58.797004%59%7,6931558.467839%58.467839%58%7,2811657.817758%57.817758%58%8,9341757.235206%57.235206%57%6,9061857.050037%57.050037%57%7,6391956.168450%56.168450%56%8,1362055.743088%55.743088%56%7,2992153.772058%53.772058%54%6,6432253.558084%53.558084%54%6,4502351.973175%51.973175%52%308,756309k51.924059%51.924059%52%6,0992451.880335%51.880335%52%6,1392551.870161%51.870161%52%8,7092651.662198%51.662198%52%5,7812751.461869%51.461869%51%8,666,3128.67M49.991146%49.991146%50%5,6462849.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M49.110629%49.110629%49%6,7922948.722719%48.722719%49%6,8093048.140999%48.140999%48%5,7363148.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.794463%47.794463%48%6,1113247.316906%47.316906%47%6,9133347.057120%47.057120%47%6,5003445.839006%45.839006%46%5,3873545.780007%45.780007%46%5,2943645.295821%45.295821%45%5,4743744.167847%44.167847%44%5,9263843.539937%43.539937%44%5,4023942.565938%42.565938%43%5,4714041.664696%41.664696%42%5,2864141.373110%41.373110%41%5,0624239.109717%39.109717%39%6,4844338.671306%38.671306%39%4,7794438.564112%38.564112%39%3,9914526.425131%26.425131%26%3,6764623.655570%23.655570%24%2,95647
Count number of this marital status
# rank of upper state legislative district out of 47 by percentage of this marital status

Definitions

This page reports on the marital status of the residents of State Senate District 29 aged 15 and older. The following definitions are used in this page:

  • Never Married: a person over the age of 15 that has never been married
  • Married: married and not separated at the time of the survey, including cases where one spouse is absent for reasons other than a separation
  • Separated: including legal and de-facto separations for reasons of marital discord
  • Divorced: and not remarried at the time of the survey
  • Widowed: and not remarried at the time of the survey

These definition were taken directly from the US Census Bureau, and reflect the marital status at the time of the survey.

For additional information about the data presented on this site, including our sources, please see the About Page.

More Topics to Explore

Demographics

Income

Education

More Maps to Explore

State:
North Dakota
Counties:
Foster, LaMoure, Stutsman
Metro Area:
Jamestown Area
Cities:
Berlin, Buchanan, Carrington, Cleveland, Courtenay, Dickey, Glenfield, Grace City, Jamestown, Jud, Kensal, LaMoure, Marion, McHenry, Medina, Montpelier, Pingree, Spiritwood Lake, Streeter, Verona, Woodworth
Townships:
Adrian, Alexander, Ashland, Badger, Birtsell, Black Loam, Bloom, Bloomenfield, Bluebird, Bordulac, Bucephalia, Buchanan, Carrington, Chicago, Conklin, Corinne, Corwin, Courtenay, Cusator, Dean, Deer Lake, Durham, Eastman, Edmunds, Eldridge, Estabrook, Flint, Florance, Fried, Gerber, Germania, Glacier, Gladstone, Glen, Glenfield, Glenmore, Grand Rapids, Grandview, Gray, Greenville, Griffin, Haven, Henrietta, Hidden, Homer, Iosco, Jim River Valley, Kennison, Kensal, Larrabee, Lenton, Lippert, Litchville, Longview, Lowery, Lyon, Manns, Marstonmoor, McHenry, McKinnon, Melville, Midway, Mikkelson, Montpelier, Moon Lake, Newbury, Nogosek, Nordmore, Ovid, Paris, Pearl Lake, Peterson, Pingree, Pipestem Valley, Plainview, Prairie, Raney, Rolling Prairie, Roscoe, Rose, Rose Hill, Round Top, Russell, Ryan, Saratoga, Severn, Sharlow, Sheridan, Sinclair, Spiritwood, St. Paul, Stirton, Streeter, Strong, Sydney, Valley Spring, Wadsworth, Walters, Wano, Weld, Willowbank, Windsor, Winfield, Woodbury, Wyard, Ypsilanti
Unincorporated Places:
Spiritwood, Ypsilanti
Unorganized Territories:
Chase Lake, Northwest Stutsman
Congressional District:
ND-At Large
State House District:
ND-29
Unified School Districts:
Barnes County North 7, Carrington 10, Edgeley 3, Gackle-Streeter 56, Jamestown 1, Kensal 19, Kidder County, Kulm 7, LaMoure 8, Litchville-Marion 46, Medina 3, Midkota 7, Montpelier 14, New Rockford-Sheyenne 2, Oakes 41, Pingree-Buchanan 10
Elementary School District:
Fort Ransom 6
ZIP Codes:
58049, 58356, 58401, 58415, 58420, 58421, 58424, 58426, 58431, 58433, 58442, 58443, 58445, 58454, 58455, 58456, 58458, 58461, 58464, 58466, 58467, 58472, 58475, 58476, 58481, 58483, 58484, 58486, 58490, 58492, 58496, 58497
Neighboring State Senate Districts:
ND-12, ND-14, ND-23, ND-24, ND-26, ND-28