Age and Sex in State House District 70, Michigan (State House District)

Age Structure#1

Percentage in each age cohort per year of age.1 Gray areas represent percentile bands from the lower state legislative districts in Michigan.
Scope: population of Michigan, State House District 70, and other lower state legislative districts in Michigan
State House District 70
Michigan
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% Count % 85+ 80-84 75-79 70-74 67-69 65-66 62-64 60-61 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 22-24 21 20 18-19 15-17 10-14 5-9 0-4 1,668 1.925% 1.93% 1,681 1.940% 1.94% 2,210 2.551% 2.55% 3,026 3.493% 3.49% 2,215 2.557% 2.56% 1,672 1.930% 1.93% 2,788 3.218% 3.22% 2,126 2.454% 2.45% 5,522 6.374% 6.37% 6,404 7.392% 7.39% 6,360 7.341% 7.34% 5,909 6.820% 6.82% 5,270 6.083% 6.08% 5,657 6.530% 6.53% 5,614 6.480% 6.48% 3,427 3.956% 3.96% 1,258 1.452% 1.45% 1,451 1.675% 1.67% 2,886 3.331% 3.33% 3,545 4.092% 4.09% 5,655 6.527% 6.53% 5,247 6.056% 6.06% 5,046 5.824% 5.82%

Detailed Age and Sex#2

Percentage in each age cohort per year of age.1
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 70
Female Male
Michigan
State House District 70
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
0.5% 0.0% 0.5% Count % 85+ 80-84 75-79 70-74 67-69 65-66 62-64 60-61 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 22-24 21 20 18-19 15-17 10-14 5-9 0-4 -0.042563% -0.035204% -0.040561% -0.042597% -0.077767% 0.08% 0.042563% 0.040561% 0.042563% 0.04% 1,668 1.925% 1.93% -0.165287% -0.057481% -0.161880% -0.081169% -0.222769% 0.22% 0.165287% 0.161880% 0.165287% 0.17% 1,681 1.940% 1.94% -0.217459% -0.075257% -0.216615% -0.065037% -0.292716% 0.29% 0.217459% 0.216615% 0.217459% 0.22% 2,210 2.551% 2.55% -0.327574% -0.043399% -0.303382% -0.047716% -0.370973% 0.37% 0.327574% 0.303382% 0.327574% 0.33% 3,026 3.493% 3.49% -0.374744% -0.102727% -0.390289% -0.048617% -0.477471% 0.48% 0.374744% 0.390289% 0.374744% 0.37% 2,215 2.557% 2.56% -0.413795% -0.472457% -0.034468% -0.413795% 0.41% 0.413795% 0.137355% 0.472457% 0.551150% 0.55% 1,672 1.930% 1.93% -0.482473% -0.551434% -0.042083% -0.482473% 0.48% 0.482473% 0.107729% 0.551434% 0.590202% 0.59% 2,788 3.218% 3.22% -0.603668% -0.019622% -0.618171% -0.035034% -0.623290% 0.62% 0.603668% 0.618171% 0.603668% 0.60% 2,126 2.454% 2.45% -0.633909% -0.690351% -0.037234% -0.633909% 0.63% 0.633909% 0.006925% 0.690351% 0.640835% 0.64% 5,522 6.374% 6.37% -0.684927% -0.752598% -0.027135% -0.684927% 0.68% 0.684927% 0.108499% 0.752598% 0.793425% 0.79% 6,404 7.392% 7.39% -0.663227% -0.718973% -0.016304% -0.663227% 0.66% 0.663227% 0.141741% 0.718973% 0.804968% 0.80% 6,360 7.341% 7.34% -0.601360% -0.660030% -0.015298% -0.601360% 0.60% 0.601360% 0.161363% 0.660030% 0.762723% 0.76% 5,909 6.820% 6.82% -0.527027% -0.593067% -0.006557% -0.527027% 0.53% 0.527027% 0.162517% 0.593067% 0.689544% 0.69% 5,270 6.083% 6.08% -0.560269% -0.584223% -0.007944% -0.560269% 0.56% 0.560269% 0.185371% 0.584223% 0.745640% 0.75% 5,657 6.530% 6.53% -0.560500% -0.594243% -0.560500% 0.56% 0.560500% 0.174983% 0.594243% 0.005321% 0.735483% 0.74% 5,614 6.480% 6.48% -0.483627% -0.643449% -0.483627% 0.48% 0.483627% 0.351274% 0.643449% 0.017061% 0.834901% 0.83% 3,427 3.956% 3.96% -0.563270% -0.730390% -0.563270% 0.56% 0.563270% 0.325496% 0.730390% 0.032753% 0.888766% 0.89% 1,258 1.452% 1.45% -0.805660% -0.063483% -0.791404% -0.869144% 0.87% 0.805660% 0.791404% 0.016731% 0.805660% 0.81% 1,451 1.675% 1.67% -0.762376% -0.728680% -0.762376% 0.76% 0.762376% 0.140817% 0.728680% 0.035838% 0.903194% 0.90% 2,886 3.331% 3.33% -0.639450% -0.694244% -0.639450% 0.64% 0.639450% 0.085029% 0.694244% 0.039267% 0.724479% 0.72% 3,545 4.092% 4.09% -0.603668% -0.098111% -0.662563% -0.701779% 0.70% 0.603668% 0.662563% 0.023188% 0.603668% 0.60% 5,655 6.527% 6.53% -0.536260% -0.616974% -0.536260% 0.54% 0.536260% 0.138740% 0.616974% 0.037679% 0.675000% 0.68% 5,247 6.056% 6.06% -0.570888% -0.578253% -0.570888% 0.57% 0.570888% 0.023085% 0.578253% 0.027497% 0.593973% 0.59% 5,046 5.824% 5.82%

Age and Sex#3

Percentage in each age cohort per year of age.1
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 70
Female Male
Michigan
State House District 70
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
0.5% 0.0% 0.5% Count % Senior 2 Older Adult 3 Younger Adult 4 College 5 Children 6 -0.179420% -0.041040% -0.171504% -0.051832% -0.220460% 0.22% 0.179420% 0.171504% 0.179420% 0.18% 12,472 12.5k 14.396% 14.4% -0.624445% -0.680017% -0.027047% -0.624445% 0.62% 0.624445% 0.095063% 0.680017% 0.719508% 0.72% 29,109 29.1k 33.599% 33.6% -0.538325% -0.603362% -0.538325% 0.54% 0.538325% 0.203788% 0.603362% 0.000293% 0.742113% 0.74% 19,968 20.0k 23.048% 23.0% -0.739292% -0.744789% -0.739292% 0.74% 0.739292% 0.135912% 0.744789% 0.030290% 0.875203% 0.88% 5,595 6.458% 6.46% -0.609055% -0.631760% -0.609055% 0.61% 0.609055% 0.031870% 0.631760% 0.031090% 0.640925% 0.64% 19,493 19.5k 22.500% 22.5%

Sex Ratio#4

Percentage more males or females in selected age cohorts.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 70
More Females More Males
Michigan
State House District 70
100% 50% 0% 50% M:F F M 85+ 80-84 75-79 70-74 67-69 65-66 62-64 60-61 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 22-24 21 20 18-19 15-17 10-14 5-9 0-4 -82.711864% -105.018781% -82.711864% 82.7% 0.547 0.55 64.628% 64.6% 35.372% 35.4% -34.776536% -50.141218% -34.776536% 34.8% 0.742 0.74 57.406% 57.4% 42.594% 42.6% -34.607219% -30.024095% -34.607219% 34.6% 0.743 0.74 57.376% 57.4% 42.624% 42.6% -13.248767% -15.727880% -13.248767% 13.2% 0.883 0.88 53.106% 53.1% 46.894% 46.9% -27.412731% -12.456697% -27.412731% 27.4% 0.785 0.78 56.027% 56.0% 43.973% 44.0% -7.295402% 33.193863% 33.193863% 33.2% 1.332 1.33 42.883% 42.9% 57.117% 57.1% -7.631492% 22.328549% 22.328549% 22.3% 1.223 1.22 44.978% 45.0% 55.022% 55.0% -3.250478% -5.667370% -3.250478% 3.3% 0.969 0.97 50.800% 50.8% 49.200% 49.2% -5.393501% 1.092498% 1.092498% 1.1% 1.011 1.01 49.728% 49.7% 50.272% 50.3% -3.605519% 15.840917% 15.840917% 15.8% 1.158 1.16 46.330% 46.3% 53.670% 53.7% -2.267637% 21.371389% 21.371389% 21.4% 1.214 1.21 45.173% 45.2% 54.827% 54.8% -2.317812% 26.833013% 26.833013% 26.8% 1.268 1.27 44.085% 44.1% 55.915% 55.9% -1.105555% 30.836618% 30.836618% 30.8% 1.308 1.31 43.321% 43.3% 56.679% 56.7% -1.359840% 33.086115% 33.086115% 33.1% 1.331 1.33 42.903% 42.9% 57.097% 57.1% 31.219110% 0.895359% 31.219110% 31.2% 1.312 1.31 43.249% 43.2% 56.751% 56.8% 72.633254% 2.651491% 72.633254% 72.6% 1.726 1.73 36.679% 36.7% 63.321% 63.3% 57.786885% 4.484330% 57.786885% 57.8% 1.578 1.58 38.792% 38.8% 61.208% 61.2% -7.879656% -7.879656% 7.9% 2.114035% 0.927 0.93 51.895% 51.9% 48.105% 48.1% 18.470855% 4.918238% 18.470855% 18.5% 1.185 1.18 45.773% 45.8% 54.227% 54.2% 13.297232% 5.656116% 13.297232% 13.3% 1.133 1.13 46.883% 46.9% 53.117% 53.1% -16.252390% -16.252390% 16.3% 3.499762% 0.860 0.86 53.758% 53.8% 46.242% 46.2% 25.871718% 6.107098% 25.871718% 25.9% 1.259 1.26 44.273% 44.3% 55.727% 55.7% 4.043672% 4.755224% 4.043672% 4.0% 1.040 1.04 49.009% 49.0% 50.991% 51.0%

Map of Age Cohorts by County in State House District 70

Children Age Cohorts by County#5

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
21.1%21.6%22.2%22.7%23.2%23.8%

College Age Cohorts by County#6

Percentage of population aged 18 to 21 (%):
4.9%5.5%6.0%6.5%7.0%7.6%

20s Age Cohorts by County#7

Percentage of population aged 22 to 29 (%):
9.68%9.89%10.09%10.28%10.48%10.69%

30s Age Cohorts by County#8

Percentage of population aged 30 to 39 (%):
12.392%12.423%12.454%12.485%12.515%12.547%

40s Age Cohorts by County#9

Percentage of population aged 40 to 49 (%):
13.75%13.85%13.94%14.04%14.13%14.23%

50s Age Cohorts by County#10

Percentage of population aged 50 to 59 (%):
13.36%13.57%13.79%14.00%14.22%14.44%

60s Age Cohorts by County#11

Percentage of population aged 60 to 69 (%):
10.453%10.478%10.504%10.529%10.554%10.580%

70s Age Cohorts by County#12

Percentage of population aged 70 to 79 (%):
5.69%5.89%6.08%6.26%6.45%6.65%

80+ Age Cohorts by County#13

Percentage of population aged 80 and older (%):
3.48%3.73%3.98%4.23%4.48%4.74%
Road Data © OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Age Cohorts by County Subdivision in State House District 70

Children Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#14

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
13.9%17.0%20.1%23.2%26.3%29.4%

College Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#15

Percentage of population aged 18 to 21 (%):
1.0%4.9%8.7%12.5%16.3%20.2%

20s Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#16

Percentage of population aged 22 to 29 (%):
3.8%6.9%10.0%13.1%16.2%19.3%

30s Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#17

Percentage of population aged 30 to 39 (%):
6.8%9.4%12.0%14.5%17.1%19.7%

40s Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#18

Percentage of population aged 40 to 49 (%):
8.5%11.1%13.7%16.3%18.8%21.4%

50s Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#19

Percentage of population aged 50 to 59 (%):
9.6%12.2%14.8%17.3%19.9%22.5%

60s Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#20

Percentage of population aged 60 to 69 (%):
4.8%7.0%9.2%11.4%13.6%15.9%

70s Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#21

Percentage of population aged 70 to 79 (%):
2.4%3.9%5.5%7.0%8.5%10.1%

80+ Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#22

Percentage of population aged 80 and older (%):
1.2%2.7%4.2%5.7%7.2%8.8%
Road Data © OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Age Cohorts by Tract in State House District 70

Children Age Cohorts by Tract#23

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
0%6%12%18%24%30%

College Age Cohorts by Tract#24

Percentage of population aged 18 to 21 (%):
2.4%6.2%10.0%13.8%17.6%21.5%

20s Age Cohorts by Tract#25

Percentage of population aged 22 to 29 (%):
4%10%15%20%25%31%

30s Age Cohorts by Tract#26

Percentage of population aged 30 to 39 (%):
8.1%11.5%14.9%18.3%21.7%25.1%

40s Age Cohorts by Tract#27

Percentage of population aged 40 to 49 (%):
9.3%12.0%14.6%17.2%19.9%22.6%

50s Age Cohorts by Tract#28

Percentage of population aged 50 to 59 (%):
7.9%10.0%12.1%14.2%16.3%18.4%

60s Age Cohorts by Tract#29

Percentage of population aged 60 to 69 (%):
3.4%5.9%8.2%10.6%13.0%15.4%

70s Age Cohorts by Tract#30

Percentage of population aged 70 to 79 (%):
0.6%2.5%4.4%6.2%8.1%10.0%

80+ Age Cohorts by Tract#31

Percentage of population aged 80 and older (%):
0.0%1.9%3.7%5.6%7.5%9.4%
Road Data © OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Age Cohorts by Block Group in State House District 70

Children Age Cohorts by Block Group#32

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
0%8%15%22%29%37%

College Age Cohorts by Block Group#33

Percentage of population aged 18 to 21 (%):
0%8%17%25%34%43%

20s Age Cohorts by Block Group#34

Percentage of population aged 22 to 29 (%):
1%7%13%18%24%31%

30s Age Cohorts by Block Group#35

Percentage of population aged 30 to 39 (%):
2%8%14%21%27%33%

40s Age Cohorts by Block Group#36

Percentage of population aged 40 to 49 (%):
3.7%8.2%12.5%16.9%21.3%25.7%

50s Age Cohorts by Block Group#37

Percentage of population aged 50 to 59 (%):
4.4%8.6%12.8%16.9%21.1%25.3%

60s Age Cohorts by Block Group#38

Percentage of population aged 60 to 69 (%):
3.4%7.6%11.6%15.7%19.7%23.9%

70s Age Cohorts by Block Group#39

Percentage of population aged 70 to 79 (%):
0.0%4.0%8.0%11.9%15.9%19.9%

80+ Age Cohorts by Block Group#40

Percentage of population aged 80 and older (%):
0.0%2.8%5.6%8.4%11.2%14.0%
Road Data © OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Age Cohorts by Place in State House District 70

There are 11 places in State House District 70. This section compares all 11 of those to each other, State House District 70, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 70.

Children by Place#41

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
Scope: population of State House District 70, selected places in State House District 70, and entities that contain State House District 70
0% 10% 20% 30% Count # Howard City Greenville Lakeview Stanton Pierson Edmore Midwest United States of America United States East North Central Michigan State House District 70 MI-70 Carson City Alma Sheridan St. Louis McBride 32.247191% 32.247191% 32.2% 574 1 29.080609% 29.080609% 29.1% 2,464 2 28.821811% 28.821811% 28.8% 296 3 28.507653% 28.507653% 28.5% 447 4 28.070175% 28.070175% 28.1% 48 5 23.949580% 23.949580% 23.9% 285 6 23.782699% 23.782699% 23.8% 15,969,644 16.0M 23.713901% 23.713901% 23.7% 73,877,478 73.9M 23.670662% 23.670662% 23.7% 11,008,271 11.0M 23.302983% 23.302983% 23.3% 2,303,755 2.30M 22.499625% 22.499625% 22.5% 19,493 19.5k 21.682243% 21.682243% 21.7% 232 7 20.448931% 20.448931% 20.4% 1,904 8 17.944535% 17.944535% 17.9% 110 9 15.436604% 15.436604% 15.4% 1,142 10 12.264151% 12.264151% 12.3% 13 11

Age Cohorts by Metro Area in State House District 70

There are 2 metro areas that are fully or partially contained within State House District 70 (0 fully and 2 partially). This section compares all 2 of those to each other, State House District 70, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 70.

Children by Metro Area#50

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
Scope: population of State House District 70, selected metro areas in State House District 70, and entities that contain State House District 70
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Count # Grand Rapids and Wyoming Metro Area Grand Rapids Midwest United States of America United States East North Central Michigan State House District 70 MI-70 Alma Metro Area Alma Area 25.588738% 25.588738% 25.6% 255,610 256k 1 23.782699% 23.782699% 23.8% 15,969,644 16.0M 23.713901% 23.713901% 23.7% 73,877,478 73.9M 23.670662% 23.670662% 23.7% 11,008,271 11.0M 23.302983% 23.302983% 23.3% 2,303,755 2.30M 22.499625% 22.499625% 22.5% 19,493 19.5k 21.111322% 21.111322% 21.1% 8,898 2

Age Cohorts by County in State House District 70

There are 2 counties that are fully or partially contained within State House District 70 (1 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 2 of those to each other, State House District 70, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 70.

Children by County#59

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
Scope: population of State House District 70, selected counties in State House District 70, and entities that contain State House District 70
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Count # Midwest Montcalm County Montcalm United States of America United States East North Central Michigan State House District 70 MI-70 Gratiot County Gratiot 23.782699% 23.782699% 23.8% 15,969,644 16.0M 23.716671% 23.716671% 23.7% 14,997 15.0k 1 23.713901% 23.713901% 23.7% 73,877,478 73.9M 23.670662% 23.670662% 23.7% 11,008,271 11.0M 23.302983% 23.302983% 23.3% 2,303,755 2.30M 22.499625% 22.499625% 22.5% 19,493 19.5k 21.111322% 21.111322% 21.1% 8,898 2

Age Cohorts by County Subdivision in State House District 70

There are 30 county subdivisions that are fully or partially contained within State House District 70 (28 fully and 2 partially). This section compares all 30 of those to each other, State House District 70, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 70.

Children by County Subdivision#68

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
Scope: population of State House District 70, selected county subdivisions in State House District 70, and entities that contain State House District 70
0% 10% 20% Count # Winfield Township Winfield Greenville Stanton Eureka Township Eureka Emerson Township Emerson Cato Township Reynolds Township Reynolds Pierson Township Pierson Crystal Township Crystal Ferris Township Ferris Seville Township Seville Arcada Township Arcada Midwest Sidney Township Sidney Home Township United States of America United States East North Central Montcalm Township Montcalm Michigan Bushnell Township Bushnell Fairplain Township Fairplain State House District 70 MI-70 Maple Valley Township Maple Vly Carson City Richland Township Richland Pine Township Alma Pine River Township Pne Riv Belvidere Township Belvidere Douglass Township Douglass Day Township Bethany Township Bethany St. Louis Bloomer Township Bloomer Evergreen Township Evergreen 29.397590% 29.397590% 29.4% 732 1 29.080609% 29.080609% 29.1% 2,464 2 28.507653% 28.507653% 28.5% 447 3 28.120263% 28.120263% 28.1% 1,113 4 27.053140% 27.053140% 27.1% 224 5 26.494169% 26.494169% 26.5% 727 6 25.242718% 25.242718% 25.2% 1,326 7 25.000000% 25.000000% 25.0% 800 8 24.972129% 24.972129% 25.0% 672 9 24.852071% 24.852071% 24.9% 378 10 24.591002% 24.591002% 24.6% 481 11 24.287343% 24.287343% 24.3% 426 12 23.782699% 23.782699% 23.8% 15,969,644 16.0M 23.768903% 23.768903% 23.8% 613 13 23.738170% 23.738170% 23.7% 602 14 23.713901% 23.713901% 23.7% 73,877,478 73.9M 23.670662% 23.670662% 23.7% 11,008,271 11.0M 23.651079% 23.651079% 23.7% 789 15 23.302983% 23.302983% 23.3% 2,303,755 2.30M 22.787879% 22.787879% 22.8% 376 16 22.668900% 22.668900% 22.7% 406 17 22.499625% 22.499625% 22.5% 19,493 19.5k 22.061031% 22.061031% 22.1% 441 18 21.682243% 21.682243% 21.7% 232 19 20.982304% 20.982304% 21.0% 581 20 20.910209% 20.910209% 20.9% 340 21 20.448931% 20.448931% 20.4% 1,904 22 19.991857% 19.991857% 20.0% 491 23 19.161407% 19.161407% 19.2% 425 24 18.538499% 18.538499% 18.5% 378 25 17.237799% 17.237799% 17.2% 166 26 16.864111% 16.864111% 16.9% 242 27 15.436604% 15.436604% 15.4% 1,142 28 15.153846% 15.153846% 15.2% 591 29 13.916084% 13.916084% 13.9% 398 30