Marital Status in State Senate District 22, Michigan (State Senate District)

Marital Status#1

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 22
Female Male
Michigan
State Senate District 22
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedMarriedSeparated/DivorcedWidowed-21.969221%-29.997089%-21.969221%22%21.969221%5.705164%29.997089%6.060515%27.674385%28%23,42623.4k29,10129.1k-59.536157%-46.631047%-59.536157%60%59.536157%0.922214%46.631047%2.778150%60.458371%60%63,48463.5k63,57563.6k-9.451762%-1.704469%-11.783011%-2.359012%-11.156230%11%9.451762%11.783011%9.451762%9%11,89611.9k9,939-2.415482%-4.922909%-2.750188%-6.479654%-7.338391%7%2.415482%2.750188%2.415482%2%7,8252,540
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

Detailed Marital Status#2

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 22
Female Male
Michigan
State Senate District 22
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedNow MarriedSeparatedAbsent SpouseWidowedDivorced-21.969221%-29.997089%-21.969221%22%21.969221%5.705164%29.997089%6.060515%27.674385%28%23,42623.4k29,10129.1k-58.090987%-44.935835%-58.090987%58%58.090987%0.560528%44.935835%2.531926%58.651514%59%61,94361.9k61,67561.7k-0.452665%-0.482335%-1.206320%-0.339268%-0.935000%1%0.452665%1.206320%0.452665%0%997476-1.445171%-1.695212%-1.445171%1%1.445171%0.361686%1.695212%0.246224%1.806857%2%1,5411,900-2.415482%-4.922909%-2.750188%-6.479654%-7.338391%7%2.415482%2.750188%2.415482%2%7,8252,540-8.999097%-1.222134%-10.576690%-2.019743%-10.221230%10%8.999097%10.576690%8.999097%9%10,89910.9k9,463
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

The Married by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 22
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1714.066%14.1%56.056%56.1%42.552%42.6%73.591%73.6%67.032%67.0%81.364%81.4%76.263%76.3%79.573%79.6%75.118%75.1%75.565%75.6%79.194%79.2%75.798%75.8%79.159%79.2%73.386%73.4%72.684%72.7%77.261%77.3%78.290%78.3%71.290%71.3%70.582%70.6%62.192%62.2%43.004%43.0%30.895%30.9%8.661%8.66%3.758%3.76%0.276%0.28%1.466%1.47%1.050%1.05%0.316%0.32%
F percentage of married females in age cohort
M percentage of married males in age cohort

The Divorced1 by Sex and Age#5

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 22
Female
Male
0%5%10%15%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 177.033%7.03%3.250%3.25%9.838%9.84%7.052%7.05%14.729%14.7%11.558%11.6%15.024%15.0%13.564%13.6%18.019%18.0%15.364%15.4%14.808%14.8%14.613%14.6%14.344%14.3%14.385%14.4%15.989%16.0%11.277%11.3%8.700%8.70%9.275%9.28%7.783%7.78%5.792%5.79%3.562%3.56%1.953%1.95%1.242%1.24%0.324%0.32%0.000%0%0.120%0.12%0.000%0%0.268%0.27%
F percentage of divorced females in age cohort
M percentage of divorced males in age cohort
1and Separated

The Never Married by Sex and Age#6

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 22
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 171.922%1.92%2.880%2.88%2.030%2.03%2.506%2.51%2.324%2.32%2.398%2.40%3.070%3.07%4.847%4.85%3.310%3.31%7.219%7.22%4.588%4.59%8.315%8.31%6.021%6.02%11.742%11.7%10.313%10.3%11.115%11.1%12.658%12.7%19.159%19.2%21.634%21.6%31.898%31.9%53.434%53.4%67.152%67.2%90.098%90.1%95.918%95.9%99.724%99.7%98.414%98.4%98.950%98.9%99.416%99.4%
F percentage of never married females in age cohort
M percentage of never married males in age cohort

The Widowed by Sex and Age#7

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 22
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1776.979%77.0%37.814%37.8%45.580%45.6%16.852%16.9%15.915%15.9%4.680%4.68%5.643%5.64%2.016%2.02%3.552%3.55%1.852%1.85%1.410%1.41%1.274%1.27%0.476%0.48%0.487%0.49%1.014%1.01%0.347%0.35%0.352%0.35%0.275%0.28%0.000%0%0.119%0.12%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of widowed females in age cohort
M percentage of widowed males in age cohort

The Married by Age#8

Percentage of age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the upper state legislative districts in Michigan.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 22
State Senate District 22
Michigan
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%Count85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 171,1256,11617,92817.9k14,62414.6k15,78015.8k17,66617.7k15,53815.5k13,05813.1k10,69610.7k9,0854,4418645781
Count number of married in age cohort in State Senate District 22

Marital Status by Race#9

Percentage of each ethno-racial group.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 22
State Senate District 22
Michigan
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Married
Never Married
50%0%50%CountAsian2White1Other2White HispanicMixed2Black2-20.789074%-0.242792%-3.065250%-31.533651%-0.545272%-3.702842%-24.097117%24%74.415781%1.487102%60.836114%3.382120%75.902883%76%3,295-24.338969%-0.700254%-9.637642%-28.404956%-1.009921%-11.788890%-34.676866%35%60.270478%5.052657%52.395394%6.400839%65.323134%65%199,499199k-34.023669%-0.369822%-5.917160%-39.832515%-2.679443%-11.428023%-40.310651%40%56.508876%3.180473%42.539952%3.520068%59.689349%60%1,352-30.692771%-0.331325%-10.692771%-43.045654%-2.025080%-9.506242%-41.716867%42%56.415663%1.867470%42.359085%3.063938%58.283133%58%3,320-43.188406%-0.833333%-11.920290%-54.604964%-1.759718%-10.417404%-55.942029%56%41.231884%2.826087%30.020725%3.197190%44.057971%44%2,760-39.423077%-1.858974%-17.307692%-53.580862%-3.364937%-12.843388%-58.589744%59%38.012821%3.397436%24.149425%6.061389%41.410256%41%1,560
Count number of people of given race
1non-Hispanic 2including Hispanic

Map of Marital Status by County in State Senate District 22

Married Marital Status by County#10

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
44.0%47.0%50.0%53.1%56.1%59.1%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County#11

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
9.72%9.91%10.09%10.27%10.45%10.64%

Widowed Marital Status by County#12

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
3.85%4.09%4.33%4.56%4.80%5.05%

Never Married Marital Status by County#13

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
25.2%28.7%32.1%35.5%39.0%42.4%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 22

Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#14

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
34%42%49%57%64%72%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County Subdivision#15

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
3.0%6.4%9.7%13.0%16.2%19.6%

Widowed Marital Status by County Subdivision#16

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
1.4%3.3%5.2%7.0%8.9%10.8%

Never Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#17

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
18%26%33%40%48%55%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Tract in State Senate District 22

Married Marital Status by Tract#18

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
16%29%41%53%65%78%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Tract#19

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
3.8%8.5%13.0%17.6%22.1%26.8%

Widowed Marital Status by Tract#20

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
1.3%4.0%6.8%9.5%12.2%15.0%

Never Married Marital Status by Tract#21

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
16%25%35%44%54%63%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Marital Status by Place in State Senate District 22

There are 10 places that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 22 (8 fully and 2 partially). This section compares all 10 of those to each other, State Senate District 22, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 22.

Married by Place#22

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 22, selected places in State Senate District 22, and entities that contain State Senate District 22
0%20%40%Count#MI-22DexterPinckneyChelseaMidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganFowlervilleFentonWhitmore LakeManchesterBrightonHowellAnn Arbor59.994051%59.994051%60%127,059127k57.899870%57.899870%58%1,781155.795283%55.795283%56%1,112254.880429%54.880429%55%2,249349.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M47.793796%47.793796%48%1,094445.418540%45.418540%45%4,243545.363636%45.363636%45%2,495645.247148%45.247148%45%833745.131399%45.131399%45%2,971841.079222%41.079222%41%3,106934.182653%34.182653%34%35,72635.7k10
Count number of this marital status
# rank of place out of 10 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Metro Area in State Senate District 22

There are 2 metro areas that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 22 (0 fully and 2 partially). This section compares all 2 of those to each other, State Senate District 22, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 22.

Married by Metro Area#26

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 22, selected metro areas in State Senate District 22, and entities that contain State Senate District 22
0%20%40%Count#MI-22MidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganDetroit AreaAnn Arbor59.994051%59.994051%60%127,059127k49.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M46.299539%46.299539%46%1,616,4721.62M144.034752%44.034752%44%132,287132k2
Count number of this marital status
# rank of metro area out of 2 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County in State Senate District 22

There are 2 counties that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 22 (1 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 2 of those to each other, State Senate District 22, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 22.

Married by County#30

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 22, selected counties in State Senate District 22, and entities that contain State Senate District 22
0%20%40%Count#MI-22LivingstonMidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganWashtenaw59.994051%59.994051%60%127,059127k59.060929%59.060929%59%89,63589.6k149.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M44.034752%44.034752%44%132,287132k2
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county out of 2 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 22

There are 35 county subdivisions that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 22 (31 fully and 4 partially). This section compares all 35 of those to each other, State Senate District 22, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 22.

Married by County Subdivision#34

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 22, selected county subdivisions in State Senate District 22, and entities that contain State Senate District 22
0%20%40%60%Count#WebsterLima TownshipDexterLodi TownshipScio TownshipBridgewaterTyroneHartlandMarionDeerfieldHamburgOceolaBrightonSylvanIoscoCohoctahMI-22GenoaConwayUnadillaFreedomPutnamDexterGrn OakSharonLyndonManchesterChelseaSalineHandyNorthfieldHowellMidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganBrightonHowellAnn Arbor71.671118%71.671118%72%3,757171.196037%71.196037%71%2,012268.541543%68.541543%69%3,473366.389713%66.389713%66%3,356465.830673%65.830673%66%8,662565.290520%65.290520%65%854664.166565%64.166565%64%5,270763.819876%63.819876%64%7,398863.554217%63.554217%64%5,486962.993703%62.993703%63%2,2011062.824175%62.824175%63%11,21611.2k1162.692572%62.692572%63%6,3891262.524694%62.524694%63%9,4951362.335066%62.335066%62%1,5591462.057667%62.057667%62%1,8941560.048679%60.048679%60%1,7271659.994051%59.994051%60%127,059127k59.817953%59.817953%60%9,9891759.655689%59.655689%60%1,5941859.260563%59.260563%59%1,6831959.199384%59.199384%59%7692058.022599%58.022599%58%4,1082157.899870%57.899870%58%1,7812257.418290%57.418290%57%8,6962356.849315%56.849315%57%9962456.417910%56.417910%56%1,3232555.810358%55.810358%56%2,1662654.880429%54.880429%55%2,2492754.844607%54.844607%55%9002854.361247%54.361247%54%3,4342952.676221%52.676221%53%3,6023051.513579%51.513579%52%2,9783149.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M45.131399%45.131399%45%2,9713241.079222%41.079222%41%3,1063334.182653%34.182653%34%35,72635.7k34
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 34 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Upper State Legislative District in Michigan

There are 38 upper state legislative districts in Michigan. This section compares State Senate District 22 to all of the upper state legislative districts in Michigan and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 22.

Married by Upper State Legislative District#38

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 22, selected other upper state legislative districts in Michigan, and entities that contain State Senate District 22
0%20%40%Count#MI-22MI-15MI-7MI-30MI-36MI-13MI-10MI-25MI-35MI-24MI-14MI-31MI-26MI-28MI-37MI-21MI-8MI-17MI-12MI-19MI-34MidwestMI-16MI-38MI-32East North CentralUnited StatesMichiganMI-29MI-20MI-33MI-6MI-11MI-9MI-18MI-27MI-23MI-5MI-3MI-2MI-4MI-159.994051%59.994051%60%127,059127k158.554284%58.554284%59%127,492127k256.357978%56.357978%56%124,058124k356.312530%56.312530%56%123,771124k455.504035%55.504035%56%113,957114k554.690653%54.690653%55%127,106127k654.482051%54.482051%54%125,926126k754.023656%54.023656%54%116,334116k854.001027%54.001027%54%113,562114k953.981621%53.981621%54%119,484119k1053.271894%53.271894%53%108,672109k1153.095579%53.095579%53%109,070109k1253.054170%53.054170%53%112,495112k1352.964294%52.964294%53%113,074113k1452.854850%52.854850%53%112,945113k1552.100891%52.100891%52%113,321113k1651.564194%51.564194%52%118,428118k1751.546366%51.546366%52%105,035105k1851.270760%51.270760%51%108,633109k1950.382878%50.382878%50%105,272105k2049.602997%49.602997%50%98,39398.4k2149.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M49.362517%49.362517%49%100,315100k2249.128861%49.128861%49%104,784105k2348.610539%48.610539%49%103,766104k2448.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M45.134293%45.134293%45%100,524101k2544.479473%44.479473%44%93,96694.0k2644.091594%44.091594%44%91,88691.9k2743.574016%43.574016%44%92,63492.6k2843.544016%43.544016%44%100,571101k2940.475678%40.475678%40%90,17990.2k3039.461139%39.461139%39%94,86394.9k3138.225576%38.225576%38%75,08075.1k3237.291403%37.291403%37%83,57683.6k3334.534543%34.534543%35%71,58771.6k3434.028219%34.028219%34%64,29764.3k3533.170627%33.170627%33%61,56861.6k3632.687623%32.687623%33%63,19463.2k3730.503459%30.503459%31%63,39963.4k38
Count number of this marital status
# rank of upper state legislative district out of 38 by percentage of this marital status

Definitions

This page reports on the marital status of the residents of State Senate District 22 aged 15 and older. The following definitions are used in this page:

  • Never Married: a person over the age of 15 that has never been married
  • Married: married and not separated at the time of the survey, including cases where one spouse is absent for reasons other than a separation
  • Separated: including legal and de-facto separations for reasons of marital discord
  • Divorced: and not remarried at the time of the survey
  • Widowed: and not remarried at the time of the survey

These definition were taken directly from the US Census Bureau, and reflect the marital status at the time of the survey.

For additional information about the data presented on this site, including our sources, please see the About Page.

More Topics to Explore

Demographics

Income

Education

More Maps to Explore

State:
Michigan
Counties:
Livingston, Washtenaw
Metro Areas:
Ann Arbor Area, Detroit Area
Cities:
Ann Arbor, Brighton, Chelsea, Dexter, Fenton, Howell
Townships:
Bridgewater, Brighton, Cohoctah, Conway, Deerfield, Dexter, Freedom, Genoa, Green Oak, Hamburg, Handy, Hartland, Howell, Iosco, Lima, Lodi, Lyndon, Manchester, Marion, Northfield, Oceola, Putnam, Saline, Scio, Sharon, Sylvan, Tyrone, Unadilla, Webster
Unincorporated Place:
Whitmore Lake
Villages:
Fowlerville, Manchester, Pinckney
Congressional Districts:
MI-7, MI-8, MI-12
State House Districts:
MI-42, MI-47, MI-52
Unified School Districts:
Ann Arbor, Brighton, Byron, Chelsea, Clinton, Columbia, Dexter, Fenton, Fowlerville, Grass Lake, Hartland, Howell, Huron Valley, Linden, Manchester, Milan, Morrice, Pinckney, Saline, South Lyon, Stockbridge, Webberville, Whitmore Lake
ZIP Codes:
48103, 48105, 48108, 48114, 48116, 48118, 48130, 48137, 48139, 48143, 48158, 48169, 48176, 48178, 48189, 48353, 48380, 48418, 48430, 48442, 48451, 48816, 48836, 48843, 48855, 48872, 48892, 49236, 49240, 49285, 49287
Neighboring State Senate Districts:
MI-14, MI-15, MI-16, MI-17, MI-18, MI-23, MI-24, MI-32
Nearby State Senate Districts:
MI-1, MI-3, MI-4, MI-5, MI-6, MI-7, MI-11, MI-12, MI-13, MI-27