Marital Status in State Senate District 28, Michigan (State Senate District)

Marital Status#1

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 28
Female Male
Michigan
State Senate District 28
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedMarriedSeparated/DivorcedWidowed-28.070337%-29.997089%-28.070337%28%28.070337%5.140676%29.997089%6.060515%33.211013%33%30,55430.6k34,75334.8k-51.856718%-46.631047%-51.856718%52%51.856718%2.259659%46.631047%2.778150%54.116377%54%56,44556.4k56,62956.6k-10.811999%-2.377954%-11.783011%-2.359012%-13.189953%13%10.811999%11.783011%10.811999%11%14,35714.4k11,31411.3k-1.860612%-5.022381%-2.750188%-6.479654%-6.882993%7%1.860612%2.750188%1.860612%2%7,4921,947
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

Detailed Marital Status#2

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 28
Female Male
Michigan
State Senate District 28
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
40%20%0%20%40%FMNever MarriedNow MarriedSeparatedAbsent SpouseWidowedDivorced-28.070337%-29.997089%-28.070337%28%28.070337%5.140676%29.997089%6.060515%33.211013%33%30,55430.6k34,75334.8k-50.598082%-44.935835%-50.598082%51%50.598082%2.232972%44.935835%2.531926%52.831054%53%55,07555.1k55,28455.3k-0.732013%-0.427402%-1.206320%-0.339268%-1.159415%1%0.732013%1.206320%0.732013%1%1,262766-1.258636%-1.695212%-1.258636%1%1.258636%0.026687%1.695212%0.246224%1.285322%1%1,3701,345-1.860612%-5.022381%-2.750188%-6.479654%-6.882993%7%1.860612%2.750188%1.860612%2%7,4921,947-10.079986%-1.950552%-10.576690%-2.019743%-12.030538%12%10.079986%10.576690%10.079986%10%13,09513.1k10,54810.5k
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

The Married by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 28
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1713.098%13.1%60.310%60.3%45.026%45.0%76.393%76.4%62.365%62.4%80.495%80.5%68.124%68.1%72.363%72.4%66.915%66.9%70.789%70.8%66.776%66.8%68.717%68.7%72.354%72.4%66.549%66.5%65.191%65.2%68.889%68.9%64.628%64.6%64.986%65.0%59.613%59.6%52.020%52.0%41.413%41.4%32.801%32.8%12.487%12.5%6.719%6.72%1.971%1.97%0.000%0%0.153%0.15%0.148%0.15%
F percentage of married females in age cohort
M percentage of married males in age cohort

The Divorced1 by Sex and Age#5

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 28
Female
Male
0%5%10%15%20%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 176.296%6.30%7.172%7.17%13.010%13.0%7.481%7.48%16.431%16.4%11.313%11.3%16.337%16.3%19.408%19.4%21.260%21.3%15.826%15.8%20.421%20.4%17.467%17.5%18.297%18.3%18.183%18.2%18.462%18.5%13.925%13.9%14.146%14.1%13.693%13.7%12.592%12.6%6.647%6.65%5.079%5.08%4.332%4.33%2.426%2.43%0.681%0.68%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.188%0.19%0.229%0.23%
F percentage of divorced females in age cohort
M percentage of divorced males in age cohort
1and Separated

The Never Married by Sex and Age#6

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 28
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 175.791%5.79%2.363%2.36%2.863%2.86%3.121%3.12%4.120%4.12%4.767%4.77%8.048%8.05%6.619%6.62%7.036%7.04%11.477%11.5%9.686%9.69%12.509%12.5%8.293%8.29%14.019%14.0%14.982%15.0%15.667%15.7%20.743%20.7%21.180%21.2%27.741%27.7%40.877%40.9%53.391%53.4%62.866%62.9%85.087%85.1%92.599%92.6%98.029%98.0%100.000%100%99.659%99.7%99.623%99.6%
F percentage of never married females in age cohort
M percentage of never married males in age cohort

The Widowed by Sex and Age#7

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 28
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1774.815%74.8%30.155%30.2%39.101%39.1%13.005%13.0%17.084%17.1%3.424%3.42%7.490%7.49%1.610%1.61%4.788%4.79%1.908%1.91%3.117%3.12%1.307%1.31%1.056%1.06%1.249%1.25%1.365%1.37%1.520%1.52%0.482%0.48%0.141%0.14%0.055%0.05%0.457%0.46%0.117%0.12%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of widowed females in age cohort
M percentage of widowed males in age cohort

The Married by Age#8

Percentage of age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the upper state legislative districts in Michigan.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 28
State Senate District 28
Michigan
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%Count85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 171,0775,56914,13714.1k10,99411.0k13,39213.4k13,56713.6k12,74212.7k10,55910.6k11,61311.6k10,46310.5k7,2771,6125418
Count number of married in age cohort in State Senate District 28

Marital Status by Race#9

Percentage of each ethno-racial group.
Scope: population of Michigan and State Senate District 28
State Senate District 28
Michigan
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Married
Never Married
50%0%50%CountAsian2White1Other2White HispanicMixed2Black2-29.894680%-0.270051%-4.293816%-31.533651%-0.545272%-3.702842%-34.458547%34%62.975965%2.565487%60.836114%3.382120%65.541453%66%3,703-27.552066%-0.703357%-11.554128%-28.404956%-1.009921%-11.788890%-39.809551%40%55.378787%4.811662%52.395394%6.400839%60.190449%60%182,411182k-42.035798%-4.284939%-7.991322%-39.832515%-2.679443%-11.428023%-54.312059%54%42.758995%2.928946%42.539952%3.520068%45.687941%46%5,531-46.122290%-2.129322%-7.315882%-43.045654%-2.025080%-9.506242%-55.567494%56%42.557140%1.875366%42.359085%3.063938%44.432506%44%10,23810.2k-60.149355%-1.086219%-10.115411%-54.604964%-1.759718%-10.417404%-71.350984%71%28.128536%0.520480%30.020725%3.197190%28.649016%29%4,419-58.937265%-3.227153%-10.710808%-53.580862%-3.364937%-12.843388%-72.875226%73%24.481847%2.642927%24.149425%6.061389%27.124774%27%7,189
Count number of people of given race
1non-Hispanic 2including Hispanic

Map of Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 28

Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#10

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
37%43%49%55%61%68%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County Subdivision#11

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
7.2%10.5%13.8%17.0%20.3%23.6%

Widowed Marital Status by County Subdivision#12

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
2.1%3.2%4.2%5.2%6.2%7.3%

Never Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#13

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
21.5%25.2%28.8%32.4%36.1%39.7%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Tract in State Senate District 28

Married Marital Status by Tract#14

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
29%37%45%54%62%70%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Tract#15

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
5.5%9.3%13.1%16.8%20.5%24.3%

Widowed Marital Status by Tract#16

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
0.9%2.9%4.9%6.9%8.9%10.9%

Never Married Marital Status by Tract#17

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
21%27%34%40%46%53%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Block Group in State Senate District 28

Married Marital Status by Block Group#18

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
16%29%42%55%68%82%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Block Group#19

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
0%7%14%21%28%35%

Widowed Marital Status by Block Group#20

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
0.0%3.7%7.4%11.2%14.9%18.6%

Never Married Marital Status by Block Group#21

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
5%16%27%37%48%59%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Marital Status by Place in State Senate District 28

There are 13 places that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 28 (10 fully and 3 partially). This section compares all 13 of those to each other, State Senate District 28, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 28.

Married by Place#22

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 28, selected places in State Senate District 28, and entities that contain State Senate District 28
0%20%40%60%Count#Byron CenterRockfordCasnoviaMI-28Grand RapidsNorthviewGrandvilleMidwestWalkerKentEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganWyomingCutlervilleKent CitySand LakeSpartaComstock ParkCedar Springs64.705882%64.705882%65%3,234158.198925%58.198925%58%2,598258.119658%58.119658%58%204352.964294%52.964294%53%113,074113k51.652328%51.652328%52%421,780422k50.547891%50.547891%51%6,412450.412120%50.412120%50%6,422549.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.838951%48.838951%49%9,780648.792608%48.792608%49%242,712243k48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M46.588223%46.588223%47%27,20127.2k745.842531%45.842531%46%5,607843.879908%43.879908%44%380941.388175%41.388175%41%1611039.132965%39.132965%39%1,3451137.533676%37.533676%38%3,0651237.299930%37.299930%37%1,07213
Count number of this marital status
# rank of place out of 13 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Metro Area in State Senate District 28

There is 1 metro area that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 28 (0 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 1 of those to each other, State Senate District 28, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 28.

Married by Metro Area#26

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 28, selected metro areas in State Senate District 28, and entities that contain State Senate District 28
0%10%20%30%40%50%Count#MI-28Grand RapidsMidwestKentEast North CentralUnited StatesMichigan52.964294%52.964294%53%113,074113k51.652328%51.652328%52%421,780422k49.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.792608%48.792608%49%242,712243k48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M
Count number of this marital status
# rank of metro area out of 1 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County in State Senate District 28

There is 1 county that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 28 (0 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 1 of those to each other, State Senate District 28, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 28.

Married by County#30

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 28, selected counties in State Senate District 28, and entities that contain State Senate District 28
0%10%20%30%40%50%Count#MI-28Grand RapidsMidwestKentEast North CentralUnited StatesMichigan52.964294%52.964294%53%113,074113k51.652328%51.652328%52%421,780422k49.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.792608%48.792608%49%242,712243k48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county out of 1 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 28

There are 19 county subdivisions in State Senate District 28. This section compares all 19 of those to each other, State Senate District 28, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 28.

Married by County Subdivision#34

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 28, selected county subdivisions in State Senate District 28, and entities that contain State Senate District 28
0%20%40%60%Count#CannonAlgomaOakfieldGrattanCourtlandByronRockfordSpencerPlainfieldVergennesSolonNelsonMI-28Grand RapidsTyroneGrandvilleMidwestWalkerKentEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganWyomingSpartaAlpineCedar Springs67.074360%67.074360%67%7,568165.996344%65.996344%66%5,415264.936152%64.936152%65%3,102363.014547%63.014547%63%2,036461.410412%61.410412%61%4,058559.760535%59.760535%60%10,18210.2k658.198925%58.198925%58%2,598757.792402%57.792402%58%1,932857.590389%57.590389%58%15,14815.1k956.613611%56.613611%57%2,0631055.359796%55.359796%55%2,6081154.318719%54.318719%54%2,0691252.964294%52.964294%53%113,074113k51.652328%51.652328%52%421,780422k50.620872%50.620872%51%1,9161350.412120%50.412120%50%6,4221449.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.838951%48.838951%49%9,7801548.792608%48.792608%49%242,712243k48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M46.588223%46.588223%47%27,20127.2k1645.160852%45.160852%45%3,3271741.994678%41.994678%42%4,5771837.299930%37.299930%37%1,07219
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 19 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Upper State Legislative District in Michigan

There are 38 upper state legislative districts in Michigan. This section compares State Senate District 28 to all of the upper state legislative districts in Michigan and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 28.

Married by Upper State Legislative District#38

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 28, selected other upper state legislative districts in Michigan, and entities that contain State Senate District 28
0%20%40%Count#MI-22MI-15MI-7MI-30MI-36MI-13MI-10MI-25MI-35MI-24MI-14MI-31MI-26MI-28MI-37MI-21Grand RapidsMI-8MI-17MI-12MI-19MI-34MidwestMI-16MI-38KentMI-32East North CentralUnited StatesMichiganMI-29MI-20MI-33MI-6MI-11MI-9MI-18MI-27MI-23MI-5MI-3MI-2MI-4MI-159.994051%59.994051%60%127,059127k158.554284%58.554284%59%127,492127k256.357978%56.357978%56%124,058124k356.312530%56.312530%56%123,771124k455.504035%55.504035%56%113,957114k554.690653%54.690653%55%127,106127k654.482051%54.482051%54%125,926126k754.023656%54.023656%54%116,334116k854.001027%54.001027%54%113,562114k953.981621%53.981621%54%119,484119k1053.271894%53.271894%53%108,672109k1153.095579%53.095579%53%109,070109k1253.054170%53.054170%53%112,495112k1352.964294%52.964294%53%113,074113k1452.854850%52.854850%53%112,945113k1552.100891%52.100891%52%113,321113k1651.652328%51.652328%52%421,780422k51.564194%51.564194%52%118,428118k1751.546366%51.546366%52%105,035105k1851.270760%51.270760%51%108,633109k1950.382878%50.382878%50%105,272105k2049.602997%49.602997%50%98,39398.4k2149.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M49.362517%49.362517%49%100,315100k2249.128861%49.128861%49%104,784105k2348.792608%48.792608%49%242,712243k48.610539%48.610539%49%103,766104k2448.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M45.134293%45.134293%45%100,524101k2544.479473%44.479473%44%93,96694.0k2644.091594%44.091594%44%91,88691.9k2743.574016%43.574016%44%92,63492.6k2843.544016%43.544016%44%100,571101k2940.475678%40.475678%40%90,17990.2k3039.461139%39.461139%39%94,86394.9k3138.225576%38.225576%38%75,08075.1k3237.291403%37.291403%37%83,57683.6k3334.534543%34.534543%35%71,58771.6k3434.028219%34.028219%34%64,29764.3k3533.170627%33.170627%33%61,56861.6k3632.687623%32.687623%33%63,19463.2k3730.503459%30.503459%31%63,39963.4k38
Count number of this marital status
# rank of upper state legislative district out of 38 by percentage of this marital status

Definitions

This page reports on the marital status of the residents of State Senate District 28 aged 15 and older. The following definitions are used in this page:

  • Never Married: a person over the age of 15 that has never been married
  • Married: married and not separated at the time of the survey, including cases where one spouse is absent for reasons other than a separation
  • Separated: including legal and de-facto separations for reasons of marital discord
  • Divorced: and not remarried at the time of the survey
  • Widowed: and not remarried at the time of the survey

These definition were taken directly from the US Census Bureau, and reflect the marital status at the time of the survey.

For additional information about the data presented on this site, including our sources, please see the About Page.

More Topics to Explore

Demographics

Income

Education

More Maps to Explore

State:
Michigan
County:
Kent
Metro Area:
Grand Rapids Area
Charter Township:
Plainfield
Cities:
Cedar Springs, Grandville, Rockford, Walker, Wyoming
Townships:
Algoma, Alpine, Byron, Cannon, Courtland, Grattan, Nelson, Oakfield, Solon, Sparta, Spencer, Tyrone, Vergennes
Unincorporated Places:
Byron Center, Comstock Park, Cutlerville, Northview
Villages:
Casnovia, Kent City, Sand Lake, Sparta
Congressional Districts:
MI-2, MI-3
State House Districts:
MI-73, MI-74, MI-77, MI-86
Unified School Districts:
Belding, Byron Center, Cedar Springs, Comstock Park, Forest Hills, Godfrey-Lee, Godwin Heights, Grandville, Grant, Greenville, Kelloggsville, Kenowa Hills, Kent City, Kentwood, Lakeview, Lowell, Northview, Rockford, Sparta, Tri County, Wayland Union, Wyoming
ZIP Codes:
48809, 48838, 49301, 49306, 49315, 49318, 49319, 49321, 49326, 49327, 49330, 49331, 49341, 49343, 49345, 49347, 49348, 49403, 49418, 49503, 49504, 49507, 49508, 49509, 49519, 49525, 49534, 49544, 49548
Neighboring State Senate Districts:
MI-19, MI-26, MI-29, MI-30, MI-33, MI-34
Nearby State Senate Districts:
MI-20