Age and Sex in State Senate District 29, South Dakota (State Senate District)

Age Structure#1

Percentage in each age cohort per year of age.1 Gray areas represent percentile bands from the upper state legislative districts in South Dakota.
Scope: population of South Dakota, State Senate District 29, and other upper state legislative districts in South Dakota
State Senate District 29
South Dakota
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% Count % 85+ 80-84 75-79 70-74 67-69 65-66 62-64 60-61 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 22-24 21 20 18-19 15-17 10-14 5-9 0-4 413 1.656% 1.66% 415 1.664% 1.66% 626 2.510% 2.51% 699 2.802% 2.80% 512 2.053% 2.05% 436 1.748% 1.75% 774 3.103% 3.10% 718 2.878% 2.88% 1,999 8.014% 8.01% 1,788 7.168% 7.17% 1,406 5.637% 5.64% 1,143 4.582% 4.58% 1,594 6.390% 6.39% 1,563 6.266% 6.27% 1,685 6.755% 6.76% 1,199 4.807% 4.81% 400 1.604% 1.60% 376 1.507% 1.51% 667 2.674% 2.67% 1,011 4.053% 4.05% 1,606 6.438% 6.44% 1,873 7.509% 7.51% 2,041 8.182% 8.18%

Detailed Age and Sex#2

Percentage in each age cohort per year of age.1
Scope: population of South Dakota and State Senate District 29
Female Male
South Dakota
State Senate District 29
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% Count % 85+ 80-84 75-79 70-74 67-69 65-66 62-64 60-61 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 22-24 21 20 18-19 15-17 10-14 5-9 0-4 -0.042595% -0.018291% -0.050821% -0.046837% -0.060886% 0.06% 0.042595% 0.050821% 0.042595% 0.04% 413 1.656% 1.66% -0.156350% -0.020045% -0.188658% -0.068783% -0.176395% 0.18% 0.156350% 0.188658% 0.156350% 0.16% 415 1.664% 1.66% -0.212476% -0.076972% -0.225425% -0.070335% -0.289448% 0.29% 0.212476% 0.225425% 0.212476% 0.21% 626 2.510% 2.51% -0.235728% -0.307151% -0.035967% -0.235728% 0.24% 0.235728% 0.088999% 0.307151% 0.324727% 0.32% 699 2.802% 2.80% -0.288647% -0.106906% -0.353491% -0.026701% -0.395553% 0.40% 0.288647% 0.353491% 0.288647% 0.29% 512 2.053% 2.05% -0.420943% -0.032072% -0.442742% -0.453015% 0.45% 0.420943% 0.442742% 0.021510% 0.420943% 0.42% 436 1.748% 1.75% -0.436979% -0.532236% -0.436979% 0.44% 0.436979% 0.160359% 0.532236% 0.017854% 0.597338% 0.60% 774 3.103% 3.10% -0.585311% -0.596766% -0.585311% 0.59% 0.585311% 0.268602% 0.596766% 0.024540% 0.853913% 0.85% 718 2.878% 2.88% -0.779346% -0.676032% -0.004823% -0.779346% 0.78% 0.779346% 0.044099% 0.676032% 0.823445% 0.82% 1,999 8.014% 8.01% -0.708788% -0.016036% -0.718930% -0.724824% 0.72% 0.708788% 0.718930% 0.003757% 0.708788% 0.71% 1,788 7.168% 7.17% -0.534798% -0.057729% -0.656424% -0.592527% 0.59% 0.534798% 0.656424% 0.013573% 0.534798% 0.53% 1,406 5.637% 5.64% -0.449808% -0.016838% -0.564059% -0.466645% 0.47% 0.449808% 0.564059% 0.013742% 0.449808% 0.45% 1,143 4.582% 4.58% -0.599743% -0.545348% -0.599743% 0.60% 0.599743% 0.078576% 0.545348% 0.044886% 0.678319% 0.68% 1,594 6.390% 6.39% -0.600545% -0.608799% -0.600545% 0.60% 0.600545% 0.052117% 0.608799% 0.033810% 0.652662% 0.65% 1,563 6.266% 6.27% -0.662284% -0.647820% -0.662284% 0.66% 0.662284% 0.026459% 0.647820% 0.054847% 0.688743% 0.69% 1,685 6.755% 6.76% -0.730971% -0.638837% -0.730971% 0.73% 0.730971% 0.140314% 0.638837% 0.076709% 0.871285% 0.87% 1,199 4.807% 4.81% -0.581302% -0.719100% -0.581302% 0.58% 0.581302% 0.440988% 0.719100% 0.060713% 1.022290% 1.02% 400 1.604% 1.60% -0.653464% -0.750002% -0.653464% 0.65% 0.653464% 0.200449% 0.750002% 0.062167% 0.853913% 0.85% 376 1.507% 1.51% -0.661482% -0.720433% -0.661482% 0.66% 0.661482% 0.014031% 0.720433% 0.033931% 0.675513% 0.68% 667 2.674% 2.67% -0.668163% -0.659761% -0.668163% 0.67% 0.668163% 0.014700% 0.659761% 0.034133% 0.682863% 0.68% 1,011 4.053% 4.05% -0.579699% -0.128287% -0.636017% -0.707986% 0.71% 0.579699% 0.636017% 0.053805% 0.579699% 0.58% 1,606 6.438% 6.44% -0.675914% -0.674529% -0.675914% 0.68% 0.675914% 0.149936% 0.674529% 0.033180% 0.825850% 0.83% 1,873 7.509% 7.51% -0.770526% -0.690768% -0.770526% 0.77% 0.770526% 0.095414% 0.690768% 0.046849% 0.865940% 0.87% 2,041 8.182% 8.18%

Age and Sex#3

Percentage in each age cohort per year of age.1
Scope: population of South Dakota and State Senate District 29
Female Male
South Dakota
State Senate District 29
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
0.5% 0.0% 0.5% Count % Senior 2 Older Adult 3 Younger Adult 4 College 5 Children 6 -0.162698% -0.019934% -0.178008% -0.046164% -0.182631% 0.18% 0.162698% 0.178008% 0.162698% 0.16% 3,101 12.432% 12.4% -0.611931% -0.635663% -0.611931% 0.61% 0.611931% 0.031430% 0.635663% 0.009355% 0.643361% 0.64% 7,828 31.382% 31.4% -0.639210% -0.607019% -0.639210% 0.64% 0.639210% 0.067039% 0.607019% 0.049880% 0.706249% 0.71% 6,041 24.218% 24.2% -0.639432% -0.727492% -0.639432% 0.64% 0.639432% 0.167375% 0.727492% 0.047686% 0.806807% 0.81% 1,443 5.785% 5.78% -0.709812% -0.665881% -0.709812% 0.71% 0.709812% 0.034967% 0.665881% 0.042865% 0.744779% 0.74% 6,531 26.183% 26.2%

Sex Ratio#4

Percentage more males or females in selected age cohorts.
Scope: population of South Dakota and State Senate District 29
More Females More Males
South Dakota
State Senate District 29
50% 0% 50% M:F F M 85+ 80-84 75-79 70-74 67-69 65-66 62-64 60-61 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 22-24 21 20 18-19 15-17 10-14 5-9 0-4 -42.941176% -92.160954% -42.941176% 42.9% 0.700 0.70 58.838% 58.8% 41.162% 41.2% -12.820513% -36.459404% -12.820513% 12.8% 0.886 0.89 53.012% 53.0% 46.988% 47.0% -36.226415% -31.200946% -36.226415% 36.2% 0.734 0.73 57.668% 57.7% 42.332% 42.3% -11.709935% 37.755102% 37.755102% 37.8% 1.378 1.38 42.060% 42.1% 57.940% 57.9% -37.037037% -7.553422% -37.037037% 37.0% 0.730 0.73 57.813% 57.8% 42.188% 42.2% -7.619048% -7.619048% 7.6% 4.858355% 0.929 0.93 51.835% 51.8% 48.165% 48.2% 36.697248% 3.354584% 36.697248% 36.7% 1.367 1.37 42.248% 42.2% 57.752% 57.8% 45.890411% 4.112093% 45.890411% 45.9% 1.459 1.46 40.669% 40.7% 59.331% 59.3% -0.713441% 5.658436% 5.658436% 5.7% 1.057 1.06 48.624% 48.6% 51.376% 51.4% -2.262443% -2.262443% 2.3% 0.522536% 0.978 0.98 50.559% 50.6% 49.441% 49.4% -10.794603% -10.794603% 10.8% 2.067641% 0.903 0.90 52.560% 52.6% 47.440% 47.4% -3.743316% -3.743316% 3.7% 2.436300% 0.964 0.96 50.919% 50.9% 49.081% 49.1% 13.101604% 8.230745% 13.101604% 13.1% 1.131 1.13 46.926% 46.9% 53.074% 53.1% 8.678238% 5.553565% 8.678238% 8.7% 1.087 1.09 47.921% 47.9% 52.079% 52.1% 3.995157% 8.466460% 3.995157% 4.0% 1.040 1.04 49.021% 49.0% 50.979% 51.0% 19.195612% 12.007588% 19.195612% 19.2% 1.192 1.19 45.621% 45.6% 54.379% 54.4% 75.862069% 8.442872% 75.862069% 75.9% 1.759 1.76 36.250% 36.3% 63.750% 63.7% 30.674847% 8.288900% 30.674847% 30.7% 1.307 1.31 43.351% 43.4% 56.649% 56.6% 2.121212% 4.709840% 2.121212% 2.1% 1.021 1.02 49.475% 49.5% 50.525% 50.5% 2.200000% 5.173575% 2.200000% 2.2% 1.022 1.02 49.456% 49.5% 50.544% 50.5% -22.130014% -22.130014% 22.1% 8.459721% 0.819 0.82 54.981% 55.0% 45.019% 45.0% 22.182681% 4.918975% 22.182681% 22.2% 1.222 1.22 45.008% 45.0% 54.992% 55.0% 12.382934% 6.782218% 12.382934% 12.4% 1.124 1.12 47.085% 47.1% 52.915% 52.9%

Map of Age Cohorts by County in State Senate District 29

Children Age Cohorts by County#5

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
24.43%24.50%24.56%24.61%24.67%24.74%

College Age Cohorts by County#6

Percentage of population aged 18 to 21 (%):
5.33%5.41%5.49%5.57%5.64%5.72%

20s Age Cohorts by County#7

Percentage of population aged 22 to 29 (%):
7.7%8.6%9.5%10.4%11.2%12.1%

30s Age Cohorts by County#8

Percentage of population aged 30 to 39 (%):
11.78%11.99%12.19%12.39%12.58%12.79%

40s Age Cohorts by County#9

Percentage of population aged 40 to 49 (%):
11.04%11.25%11.45%11.65%11.85%12.06%

50s Age Cohorts by County#10

Percentage of population aged 50 to 59 (%):
14.53%14.66%14.79%14.92%15.05%15.18%

60s Age Cohorts by County#11

Percentage of population aged 60 to 69 (%):
9.4%10.0%10.6%11.1%11.7%12.3%

70s Age Cohorts by County#12

Percentage of population aged 70 to 79 (%):
4.8%5.5%6.1%6.7%7.2%7.9%

80+ Age Cohorts by County#13

Percentage of population aged 80 and older (%):
2.93%3.17%3.41%3.65%3.89%4.13%
Road Data © OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Age Cohorts by County Subdivision in State Senate District 29

Children Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#14

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
0%11%22%33%44%55%

College Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#15

Percentage of population aged 18 to 21 (%):
0.0%3.9%7.7%11.6%15.5%19.4%

20s Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#16

Percentage of population aged 22 to 29 (%):
0%7%14%21%28%36%

30s Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#17

Percentage of population aged 30 to 39 (%):
0%5%10%15%20%26%

40s Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#18

Percentage of population aged 40 to 49 (%):
0%15%30%45%60%75%

50s Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#19

Percentage of population aged 50 to 59 (%):
0%20%40%60%80%100%

60s Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#20

Percentage of population aged 60 to 69 (%):
0.0%4.3%8.6%12.9%17.2%21.6%

70s Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#21

Percentage of population aged 70 to 79 (%):
0%20%40%60%80%100%

80+ Age Cohorts by County Subdivision#22

Percentage of population aged 80 and older (%):
0.0%2.5%5.1%7.6%10.1%12.7%
Road Data © OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Age Cohorts by Tract in State Senate District 29

Children Age Cohorts by Tract#23

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
21.5%24.9%28.2%31.5%34.8%38.2%

College Age Cohorts by Tract#24

Percentage of population aged 18 to 21 (%):
3%9%15%21%27%33%

20s Age Cohorts by Tract#25

Percentage of population aged 22 to 29 (%):
5%11%17%22%28%34%

30s Age Cohorts by Tract#26

Percentage of population aged 30 to 39 (%):
8.1%9.7%11.2%12.7%14.2%15.8%

40s Age Cohorts by Tract#27

Percentage of population aged 40 to 49 (%):
1.4%4.3%7.2%10.0%12.9%15.8%

50s Age Cohorts by Tract#28

Percentage of population aged 50 to 59 (%):
2.1%5.6%9.0%12.4%15.8%19.2%

60s Age Cohorts by Tract#29

Percentage of population aged 60 to 69 (%):
0.0%2.8%5.7%8.5%11.4%14.3%

70s Age Cohorts by Tract#30

Percentage of population aged 70 to 79 (%):
0.0%1.2%2.4%3.6%4.8%6.1%

80+ Age Cohorts by Tract#31

Percentage of population aged 80 and older (%):
0.0%1.5%2.9%4.4%5.9%7.4%
Road Data © OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Age Cohorts by Block Group in State Senate District 29

Children Age Cohorts by Block Group#32

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
0%9%17%26%34%44%

College Age Cohorts by Block Group#33

Percentage of population aged 18 to 21 (%):
0%14%28%42%57%71%

20s Age Cohorts by Block Group#34

Percentage of population aged 22 to 29 (%):
1%8%14%21%27%34%

30s Age Cohorts by Block Group#35

Percentage of population aged 30 to 39 (%):
0.0%4.7%9.5%14.2%19.0%23.8%

40s Age Cohorts by Block Group#36

Percentage of population aged 40 to 49 (%):
0.0%3.6%7.2%10.8%14.4%18.0%

50s Age Cohorts by Block Group#37

Percentage of population aged 50 to 59 (%):
0%5%10%15%20%26%

60s Age Cohorts by Block Group#38

Percentage of population aged 60 to 69 (%):
0.0%4.3%8.6%12.9%17.2%21.6%

70s Age Cohorts by Block Group#39

Percentage of population aged 70 to 79 (%):
0.0%2.1%4.2%6.4%8.5%10.6%

80+ Age Cohorts by Block Group#40

Percentage of population aged 80 and older (%):
0.0%4.3%8.6%12.9%17.2%21.6%
Road Data © OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Age Cohorts by Place in State Senate District 29

There are 9 places that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 29 (7 fully and 2 partially). This section compares all 9 of those to each other, State Senate District 29, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 29.

Children by Place#41

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
Scope: population of State Senate District 29, selected places in State Senate District 29, and entities that contain State Senate District 29
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Count # Piedmont Vale Summerset Box Elder Faith State Senate District 29 SD-29 South Dakota Sturgis Newell West North Central Nisland Midwest United States of America United States Blucksberg Mountain Blucksberg Mtn 40.465116% 40.465116% 40.5% 348 1 31.360947% 31.360947% 31.4% 106 2 29.164655% 29.164655% 29.2% 604 3 28.314687% 28.314687% 28.3% 2,379 4 26.283988% 26.283988% 26.3% 87 5 26.182649% 26.182649% 26.2% 6,531 24.743274% 24.743274% 24.7% 204,181 204k 24.692469% 24.692469% 24.7% 1,646 6 24.641460% 24.641460% 24.6% 189 7 24.035114% 24.035114% 24.0% 4,961,373 4.96M 23.943662% 23.943662% 23.9% 68 8 23.782699% 23.782699% 23.8% 15,969,644 16.0M 23.713901% 23.713901% 23.7% 73,877,478 73.9M 9.112150% 9.112150% 9.1% 39 9

Age Cohorts by Metro Area in State Senate District 29

There is 1 metro area that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 29 (0 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 1 of those to each other, State Senate District 29, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 29.

Children by Metro Area#50

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
Scope: population of State Senate District 29, selected metro areas in State Senate District 29, and entities that contain State Senate District 29
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Count # State Senate District 29 SD-29 South Dakota Rapid City Metro Area Rapid City West North Central Midwest United States of America United States 26.182649% 26.182649% 26.2% 6,531 24.743274% 24.743274% 24.7% 204,181 204k 24.124639% 24.124639% 24.1% 33,044 33.0k 1 24.035114% 24.035114% 24.0% 4,961,373 4.96M 23.782699% 23.782699% 23.8% 15,969,644 16.0M 23.713901% 23.713901% 23.7% 73,877,478 73.9M

Age Cohorts by County in State Senate District 29

There are 3 counties that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 29 (0 fully and 3 partially). This section compares all 3 of those to each other, State Senate District 29, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 29.

Children by County#59

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
Scope: population of State Senate District 29, selected counties in State Senate District 29, and entities that contain State Senate District 29
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Count # State Senate District 29 SD-29 South Dakota Butte County Butte Meade County Meade Pennington County Pennington West North Central Midwest United States of America United States 26.182649% 26.182649% 26.2% 6,531 24.743274% 24.743274% 24.7% 204,181 204k 24.732765% 24.732765% 24.7% 2,522 1 24.654627% 24.654627% 24.7% 6,389 2 24.437481% 24.437481% 24.4% 25,110 25.1k 3 24.035114% 24.035114% 24.0% 4,961,373 4.96M 23.782699% 23.782699% 23.8% 15,969,644 16.0M 23.713901% 23.713901% 23.7% 73,877,478 73.9M

Age Cohorts by County Subdivision in State Senate District 29

There are 24 county subdivisions that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 29 (18 fully and 6 partially). This section compares all 24 of those to each other, State Senate District 29, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 29.

Children by County Subdivision#68

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
Scope: population of State Senate District 29, selected county subdivisions in State Senate District 29, and entities that contain State Senate District 29
0% 20% 40% Count # Union Township Union Lakeside Township Lakeside Piedmont Vale Township East Butte North Meade Summerset Box Elder Central Pennington Cntrl Pennington Box Elder Faith State Senate District 29 SD-29 South Dakota Sturgis Newell West North Central Town of Nisland Nisland Midwest United States of America United States Belle Fourche-Cheyenne Valleys Belle Fourche-Che… West Butte Southwest Meade SW Meade Dakota Township Dakota Elm Springs Township Elm Spgs Howard Township Howard 54.545455% 54.545455% 54.5% 24 1 43.037975% 43.037975% 43.0% 34 2 40.465116% 40.465116% 40.5% 348 3 32.615385% 32.615385% 32.6% 106 4 31.946007% 31.946007% 31.9% 284 5 30.020704% 30.020704% 30.0% 145 6 29.164655% 29.164655% 29.2% 604 7 28.767123% 28.767123% 28.8% 840 8 28.098275% 28.098275% 28.1% 3,877 9 28.073696% 28.073696% 28.1% 1,539 10 26.283988% 26.283988% 26.3% 87 11 26.182649% 26.182649% 26.2% 6,531 24.743274% 24.743274% 24.7% 204,181 204k 24.692469% 24.692469% 24.7% 1,646 12 24.641460% 24.641460% 24.6% 189 13 24.035114% 24.035114% 24.0% 4,961,373 4.96M 23.943662% 23.943662% 23.9% 68 14 23.782699% 23.782699% 23.8% 15,969,644 16.0M 23.713901% 23.713901% 23.7% 73,877,478 73.9M 23.250000% 23.250000% 23.3% 372 15 21.757130% 21.757130% 21.8% 473 16 21.312080% 21.312080% 21.3% 2,313 17 0.000000% 0.000000% 0.0% 0 18 0.000000% 0.000000% 0.0% 0 19 0.000000% 0.000000% 0.0% 0 20

Age Cohorts by Upper State Legislative District in South Dakota

There are 35 upper state legislative districts in South Dakota. This section compares State Senate District 29 to all of the upper state legislative districts in South Dakota and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 29.

Children by Upper State Legislative District#77

Percentage of population aged 0 to 17 (%):
Scope: population of State Senate District 29, selected other upper state legislative districts in South Dakota, and entities that contain State Senate District 29
0% 10% 20% 30% Count # State Senate District 27 SD-27 State Senate District 26 SD-26 State Senate District 6 SD-6 State Senate District 10 SD-10 State Senate District 28 SD-28 State Senate District 11 SD-11 State Senate District 9 SD-9 State Senate District 2 SD-2 State Senate District 25 SD-25 State Senate District 35 SD-35 State Senate District 14 SD-14 State Senate District 29 SD-29 State Senate District 16 SD-16 State Senate District 1 SD-1 State Senate District 21 SD-21 State Senate District 19 SD-19 South Dakota State Senate District 32 SD-32 State Senate District 5 SD-5 State Senate District 4 SD-4 West North Central State Senate District 22 SD-22 Midwest United States of America United States State Senate District 33 SD-33 State Senate District 24 SD-24 State Senate District 20 SD-20 State Senate District 8 SD-8 State Senate District 3 SD-3 State Senate District 18 SD-18 State Senate District 23 SD-23 State Senate District 34 SD-34 State Senate District 15 SD-15 State Senate District 30 SD-30 State Senate District 13 SD-13 State Senate District 12 SD-12 State Senate District 17 SD-17 State Senate District 31 SD-31 State Senate District 7 SD-7 35.089247% 35.089247% 35.1% 8,060 1 33.663988% 33.663988% 33.7% 8,043 2 32.300867% 32.300867% 32.3% 7,863 3 29.304337% 29.304337% 29.3% 6,980 4 29.276779% 29.276779% 29.3% 7,068 5 28.665514% 28.665514% 28.7% 6,964 6 27.733031% 27.733031% 27.7% 6,852 7 26.993413% 26.993413% 27.0% 6,598 8 26.878102% 26.878102% 26.9% 6,390 9 26.833646% 26.833646% 26.8% 6,728 10 26.298542% 26.298542% 26.3% 6,420 11 26.182649% 26.182649% 26.2% 6,531 12 26.159555% 26.159555% 26.2% 5,922 13 25.193018% 25.193018% 25.2% 6,004 14 25.128912% 25.128912% 25.1% 5,653 15 24.799051% 24.799051% 24.8% 5,646 16 24.743274% 24.743274% 24.7% 204,181 204k 24.666950% 24.666950% 24.7% 6,388 17 24.552839% 24.552839% 24.6% 5,834 18 24.412505% 24.412505% 24.4% 5,724 19 24.035114% 24.035114% 24.0% 4,961,373 4.96M 23.823723% 23.823723% 23.8% 5,433 20 23.782699% 23.782699% 23.8% 15,969,644 16.0M 23.713901% 23.713901% 23.7% 73,877,478 73.9M 23.708495% 23.708495% 23.7% 5,241 21 23.293208% 23.293208% 23.3% 5,360 22 23.255051% 23.255051% 23.3% 5,674 23 22.651472% 22.651472% 22.7% 5,148 24 21.836148% 21.836148% 21.8% 5,392 25 21.769251% 21.769251% 21.8% 4,902 26 21.577213% 21.577213% 21.6% 4,780 27 21.200766% 21.200766% 21.2% 4,979 28 20.706557% 20.706557% 20.7% 4,478 29 20.450458% 20.450458% 20.5% 5,003 30 20.404486% 20.404486% 20.4% 4,530 31 20.100168% 20.100168% 20.1% 4,535 32 19.567655% 19.567655% 19.6% 4,363 33 19.152438% 19.152438% 19.2% 4,655 34 16.697665% 16.697665% 16.7% 4,040 35