Marital Status in State Senate District 35, Colorado (State Senate District)

Marital Status#1

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Colorado and State Senate District 35
Female Male
Colorado
State Senate District 35
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedMarriedSeparated/DivorcedWidowed-23.586372%-27.650331%-23.586372%24%23.586372%6.778945%27.650331%7.292818%30.365317%30%13,20213.2k17,44717.4k-52.402666%-0.471041%-50.384594%-52.873707%53%52.402666%50.384594%0.789848%52.402666%52%29,59529.6k30,10930.1k-13.442195%-11.791683%-3.516596%-13.442195%13%13.442195%0.392498%11.791683%13.834694%14%7,5247,949-3.397323%-6.700402%-2.090726%-4.566070%-10.097726%10%3.397323%2.090726%3.397323%3%5,6521,952
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

Detailed Marital Status#2

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Colorado and State Senate District 35
Female Male
Colorado
State Senate District 35
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
40%20%0%20%40%FMNever MarriedNow MarriedSeparatedAbsent SpouseWidowedDivorced-23.586372%-27.650331%-23.586372%24%23.586372%6.778945%27.650331%7.292818%30.365317%30%13,20213.2k17,44717.4k-48.796491%-1.840423%-47.949147%-50.636914%51%48.796491%47.949147%0.547150%48.796491%49%28,34328.3k28,03728.0k-1.563254%-1.289676%-0.466465%-1.563254%2%1.563254%0.339038%1.289676%1.902292%2%8751,093-2.236793%-2.435447%-2.236793%2%2.236793%1.369382%2.435447%0.242697%3.606175%4%1,2522,072-3.397323%-6.700402%-2.090726%-4.566070%-10.097726%10%3.397323%2.090726%3.397323%3%5,6521,952-11.878942%-10.502007%-3.050131%-11.878942%12%11.878942%0.053460%10.502007%11.932402%12%6,6496,856
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

The Married by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Colorado and State Senate District 35
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1713.291%13.3%51.417%51.4%46.546%46.5%71.622%71.6%64.454%64.5%72.071%72.1%65.825%65.8%68.051%68.1%68.793%68.8%61.459%61.5%63.983%64.0%63.030%63.0%65.471%65.5%58.376%58.4%74.344%74.3%62.500%62.5%68.612%68.6%60.931%60.9%63.058%63.1%51.331%51.3%47.576%47.6%37.408%37.4%16.344%16.3%10.096%10.1%3.156%3.16%0.521%0.52%0.116%0.12%1.784%1.78%
F percentage of married females in age cohort
M percentage of married males in age cohort

The Divorced1 by Sex and Age#5

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Colorado and State Senate District 35
Female
Male
0%5%10%15%20%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 176.329%6.33%9.549%9.55%10.659%10.7%11.406%11.4%14.505%14.5%16.569%16.6%18.802%18.8%20.063%20.1%19.893%19.9%21.504%21.5%21.246%21.2%20.627%20.6%20.307%20.3%21.872%21.9%15.878%15.9%18.082%18.1%17.476%17.5%13.133%13.1%10.430%10.4%10.773%10.8%7.636%7.64%7.922%7.92%3.707%3.71%1.427%1.43%0.096%0.10%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.037%0.04%
F percentage of divorced females in age cohort
M percentage of divorced males in age cohort
1and Separated

The Never Married by Sex and Age#6

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Colorado and State Senate District 35
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 171.669%1.67%2.518%2.52%2.379%2.38%2.281%2.28%3.901%3.90%4.879%4.88%7.197%7.20%9.519%9.52%6.249%6.25%13.777%13.8%9.998%10.00%14.608%14.6%12.985%13.0%18.433%18.4%8.096%8.10%19.156%19.2%11.703%11.7%25.358%25.4%24.873%24.9%37.871%37.9%44.424%44.4%53.667%53.7%79.949%79.9%88.477%88.5%96.748%96.7%99.479%99.5%99.884%99.9%98.179%98.2%
F percentage of never married females in age cohort
M percentage of never married males in age cohort

The Widowed by Sex and Age#7

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Colorado and State Senate District 35
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1778.711%78.7%36.516%36.5%40.416%40.4%14.690%14.7%17.140%17.1%6.480%6.48%8.176%8.18%2.366%2.37%5.066%5.07%3.260%3.26%4.774%4.77%1.735%1.73%1.237%1.24%1.319%1.32%1.682%1.68%0.262%0.26%2.208%2.21%0.578%0.58%1.639%1.64%0.026%0.03%0.364%0.36%1.002%1.00%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of widowed females in age cohort
M percentage of widowed males in age cohort

The Married by Age#8

Percentage of age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the upper state legislative districts in Colorado.
Scope: population of Colorado and State Senate District 35
State Senate District 35
Colorado
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%Count85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 177214,89210,66210.7k7,1476,9826,1394,9055,2284,3884,2373,1001,1757751
Count number of married in age cohort in State Senate District 35

Marital Status by Race#9

Percentage of each ethno-racial group.
Scope: population of Colorado and State Senate District 35
State Senate District 35
Colorado
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Married
Never Married
50%0%50%CountWhite1Other2White HispanicAsian2Mixed2Black2-21.785129%-1.106438%-12.327654%-28.163967%-1.089368%-12.677945%-35.219220%35%57.764312%7.016468%53.314689%4.754032%64.780780%65%70,13570.1k-29.572103%-3.167352%-10.765951%-38.759452%-3.034418%-10.672748%-43.505406%44%49.566012%6.928582%44.358433%3.174949%56.494594%56%6,567-34.610681%-2.728213%-11.166860%-38.330126%-2.715213%-9.967755%-48.505754%49%45.078240%6.416006%45.637236%3.349669%51.494246%51%31,88931.9k-42.292994%-4.713376%-8.152866%-30.131774%-1.294347%-6.714230%-55.159236%55%40.891720%3.949045%57.570370%4.289279%44.840764%45%785-42.185617%-1.807955%-13.901165%-48.981096%-2.017632%-10.462740%-57.894737%58%36.882282%5.222981%36.262994%2.275538%42.105263%42%2,489-64.472843%-2.044728%-11.565495%-43.923918%-3.301856%-13.979455%-78.083067%78%20.575080%1.341853%34.824833%3.969936%21.916933%22%1,565
Count number of people of given race
1non-Hispanic 2including Hispanic

Map of Marital Status by County in State Senate District 35

Married Marital Status by County#10

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
30%38%46%53%61%69%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County#11

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
10.0%11.8%13.6%15.4%17.2%19.0%

Widowed Marital Status by County#12

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
3.8%5.2%6.4%7.7%9.0%10.3%

Never Married Marital Status by County#13

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
13%20%27%33%40%47%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 35

Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#14

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
29%40%51%61%72%83%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County Subdivision#15

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
0%6%12%18%24%30%

Widowed Marital Status by County Subdivision#16

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
0.0%3.7%7.3%11.0%14.7%18.4%

Never Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#17

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
0%9%19%28%38%48%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Tract in State Senate District 35

Married Marital Status by Tract#18

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
30%38%46%54%62%70%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Tract#19

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
7.5%12.1%16.6%21.1%25.6%30.1%

Widowed Marital Status by Tract#20

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
2.3%4.4%6.3%8.3%10.3%12.3%

Never Married Marital Status by Tract#21

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
13%20%26%33%39%47%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Block Group in State Senate District 35

Married Marital Status by Block Group#22

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
14%30%46%61%76%92%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Block Group#23

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
2%10%17%25%32%40%

Widowed Marital Status by Block Group#24

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
0%6%11%17%22%29%

Never Married Marital Status by Block Group#25

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
0%14%28%41%55%69%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Marital Status by Place in State Senate District 35

There are 81 places that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 35 (80 fully and 1 partially). This section compares the 50 most populous of those to each other, State Senate District 35, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35. The least populous of the compared places has a population of 194.

Married by Place#26

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected places in State Senate District 35, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%20%40%60%Count#SanfordSouth ForkAlpineEl MoroColorado CityAvondaleHollyBlancaWalshBlendeJansenGranadaEadsLa VetaWileyCO-35ManassaAlamosa EastColoradoMonte VistaMountainLamarLa JuntaBeulah ValleyAguilarSilver CliffFowlerWestUnited StatesTrinidadFort GarlandLas AnimasSpringfieldLa JaraDel NorteCenterSaguacheCity of CreedeN La JuntaOlney SpringsRocky FordWestcliffeCherawPuebloSwinkRomeoBooneAlamosaManzanolaSan LuisAntonitoWalsenburgCrowleyOrdwaySugar City74.303406%74.303406%74%480173.177083%73.177083%73%281271.808511%71.808511%72%135369.759450%69.759450%70%203463.551913%63.551913%64%1,163562.019915%62.019915%62%436661.227545%61.227545%61%409759.154930%59.154930%59%210858.203125%58.203125%58%298957.355372%57.355372%57%3471055.303030%55.303030%55%731154.565217%54.565217%55%2511253.653846%53.653846%54%2791353.333333%53.333333%53%3361452.681388%52.681388%53%1671552.635105%52.635105%53%59,70459.7k52.151239%52.151239%52%4001651.272455%51.272455%51%6851750.779102%50.779102%51%2,191,9482.19M50.492979%50.492979%50%1,6901849.555906%49.555906%50%9,123,4519.12M49.314390%49.314390%49%2,9851949.183781%49.183781%49%2,8022048.861912%48.861912%49%3222148.470588%48.470588%48%2062248.249619%48.249619%48%3172348.202247%48.202247%48%4292448.094521%48.094521%48%28,965,61229.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.539342%47.539342%48%3,3232547.484277%47.484277%47%1512646.872985%46.872985%47%7272746.632566%46.632566%47%5472846.250000%46.250000%46%2592945.641026%45.641026%46%7123044.801027%44.801027%45%6983144.367816%44.367816%44%1933242.965779%42.965779%43%1133342.812500%42.812500%43%1373442.765957%42.765957%43%2013542.753165%42.753165%43%1,3513642.613636%42.613636%43%1503740.251572%40.251572%40%643839.892174%39.892174%40%34,85134.9k3937.837838%37.837838%38%2104037.412587%37.412587%37%1074137.104072%37.104072%37%824236.840021%36.840021%37%2,7914336.138614%36.138614%36%1464434.896811%34.896811%35%1864534.134615%34.134615%34%2134632.377049%32.377049%32%7904728.491620%28.491620%28%514828.391167%28.391167%28%3604927.184466%27.184466%27%8450
Count number of this marital status
# rank of place out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Metro Area in State Senate District 35

There is 1 metro area that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 35 (0 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 1 of those to each other, State Senate District 35, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35.

Married by Metro Area#30

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected metro areas in State Senate District 35, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%10%20%30%40%50%Count#CO-35ColoradoMountainWestUnited StatesPueblo Area52.635105%52.635105%53%59,70459.7k50.779102%50.779102%51%2,191,9482.19M49.555906%49.555906%50%9,123,4519.12M48.094521%48.094521%48%28,965,61229.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M46.280335%46.280335%46%60,56860.6k1
Count number of this marital status
# rank of metro area out of 1 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County in State Senate District 35

There are 16 counties that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 35 (15 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 16 of those to each other, State Senate District 35, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35.

Married by County#34

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected counties in State Senate District 35, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%20%40%60%Count#CusterMineralKiowaBacaRio GrandeConejosSaguacheProwersLas AnimasCO-35OteroColoradoCostillaMountainWestUnited StatesHuerfanoPuebloAlamosaBentCrowley68.791856%68.791856%69%2,568166.621438%66.621438%67%491258.969805%58.969805%59%664356.364241%56.364241%56%1,696456.074766%56.074766%56%5,220555.111946%55.111946%55%3,520654.357753%54.357753%54%2,738753.748691%53.748691%54%5,133853.339923%53.339923%53%6,476952.635105%52.635105%53%59,70459.7k51.192326%51.192326%51%7,5781050.779102%50.779102%51%2,191,9482.19M50.049196%50.049196%50%1,5261149.555906%49.555906%50%9,123,4519.12M48.094521%48.094521%48%28,965,61229.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.947396%47.947396%48%2,6981246.280335%46.280335%46%60,56860.6k1344.982217%44.982217%45%5,8181444.730077%44.730077%45%2,2621530.132248%30.132248%30%1,48116
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county out of 16 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in State Senate District 35

There are 54 county subdivisions that are fully or partially contained within State Senate District 35 (50 fully and 4 partially). This section compares the 50 most populous of those to each other, State Senate District 35, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 219.

Married by County Subdivision#38

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected county subdivisions in State Senate District 35, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%20%40%60%Count#South BentKimWestcliffeLa VetaCampoWest ConejosCreedeColorado City-RyeWestonPritchettSheridan LakeAvondaleMosca-HooperLa JaraMcClaveDel NorteGranadaCherawAguilarPueblo WestHollySt. Charles MesaBlancaWalshNE PuebloCenterEadsFowlerGardnerMonte VistaSpringfieldCO-35LamarManassaSargentTrinidadTwo Butte CrkSaguacheRocky FordColoradoMountainLa JuntaHuerfano VlyWestUnited StatesManzanolaAlamosaModelSan LuisAntonitoLas AnimasWalsenburgPuebloSugar CityOrdway75.842697%75.842697%76%135175.187970%75.187970%75%200268.791856%68.791856%69%2,568368.344775%68.344775%68%896467.955801%67.955801%68%123567.295597%67.295597%67%214666.621438%66.621438%67%491766.138254%66.138254%66%2,545865.208941%65.208941%65%671964.341085%64.341085%64%1661063.137255%63.137255%63%1611162.961255%62.961255%63%1,3651262.185930%62.185930%62%4951361.716937%61.716937%62%1,8621461.250000%61.250000%61%3921560.393107%60.393107%60%2,2431660.387812%60.387812%60%4361760.331230%60.331230%60%7651859.660574%59.660574%60%4571959.136418%59.136418%59%14,35314.4k2059.059745%59.059745%59%6032158.688837%58.688837%59%4,3062258.097686%58.097686%58%9042357.713651%57.713651%58%5202457.590361%57.590361%58%2392557.136343%57.136343%57%1,2532656.907478%56.907478%57%4492754.314721%54.314721%54%6422853.636364%53.636364%54%1772953.541076%53.541076%54%2,4573053.145596%53.145596%53%8873152.635105%52.635105%53%59,70459.7k52.473941%52.473941%52%3,9773252.338129%52.338129%52%8733351.689861%51.689861%52%5203451.382855%51.382855%51%4,8493551.315789%51.315789%51%1173650.917768%50.917768%51%1,3873750.812737%50.812737%51%2,2823850.779102%50.779102%51%2,191,9482.19M49.555906%49.555906%50%9,123,4519.12M49.415288%49.415288%49%3,4653949.120235%49.120235%49%3354048.094521%48.094521%48%28,965,61229.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M44.429161%44.429161%44%3234143.854012%43.854012%44%5,3234243.478261%43.478261%43%2304341.661085%41.661085%42%6224441.257225%41.257225%41%5714540.929464%40.929464%41%1,7354640.767687%40.767687%41%1,6254740.612690%40.612690%41%37,42537.4k4833.202358%33.202358%33%1694929.777576%29.777576%30%1,31250
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Upper State Legislative District in Colorado

There are 35 upper state legislative districts in Colorado. This section compares State Senate District 35 to all of the upper state legislative districts in Colorado and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with State Senate District 35.

Married by Upper State Legislative District#42

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State Senate District 35, selected other upper state legislative districts in Colorado, and entities that contain State Senate District 35
0%20%40%60%Count#CO-4CO-30CO-23CO-9CO-27CO-2CO-12CO-15CO-16CO-1CO-17CO-24CO-6CO-8CO-20CO-35CO-19CO-7ColoradoCO-28CO-5CO-10MountainCO-22CO-13CO-25WestUnited StatesCO-29CO-26CO-21CO-3CO-33CO-14CO-11CO-32CO-18CO-31CO-3466.346900%66.346900%66%79,46779.5k164.612982%64.612982%65%78,18378.2k263.168479%63.168479%63%81,98782.0k362.658731%62.658731%63%78,01278.0k460.055415%60.055415%60%71,74471.7k557.778700%57.778700%58%70,99571.0k657.683143%57.683143%58%69,47369.5k757.244588%57.244588%57%70,74070.7k855.992187%55.992187%56%70,51670.5k955.980083%55.980083%56%65,77165.8k1054.127114%54.127114%54%64,37564.4k1153.761634%53.761634%54%67,18067.2k1253.360186%53.360186%53%65,57765.6k1353.197233%53.197233%53%63,45163.5k1452.655550%52.655550%53%68,55768.6k1552.635105%52.635105%53%59,70459.7k1652.142986%52.142986%52%63,48263.5k1750.861661%50.861661%51%61,24161.2k1850.779102%50.779102%51%2,191,9482.19M50.765505%50.765505%51%59,95060.0k1950.586413%50.586413%51%60,42860.4k2050.118017%50.118017%50%62,85162.9k2149.555906%49.555906%50%9,123,4519.12M49.183665%49.183665%49%61,60561.6k2248.402176%48.402176%48%58,19258.2k2348.224120%48.224120%48%58,84558.8k2448.094521%48.094521%48%28,965,61229.0M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M46.321691%46.321691%46%54,11354.1k2546.046175%46.046175%46%59,87259.9k2645.956082%45.956082%46%55,14555.1k2744.170962%44.170962%44%50,73350.7k2842.615628%42.615628%43%55,43155.4k2941.982331%41.982331%42%56,16956.2k3041.085753%41.085753%41%47,63447.6k3140.225058%40.225058%40%53,83453.8k3240.164347%40.164347%40%52,64152.6k3336.775427%36.775427%37%50,79950.8k3434.613815%34.613815%35%43,25143.3k35
Count number of this marital status
# rank of upper state legislative district out of 35 by percentage of this marital status

Definitions

This page reports on the marital status of the residents of State Senate District 35 aged 15 and older. The following definitions are used in this page:

  • Never Married: a person over the age of 15 that has never been married
  • Married: married and not separated at the time of the survey, including cases where one spouse is absent for reasons other than a separation
  • Separated: including legal and de-facto separations for reasons of marital discord
  • Divorced: and not remarried at the time of the survey
  • Widowed: and not remarried at the time of the survey

These definition were taken directly from the US Census Bureau, and reflect the marital status at the time of the survey.

For additional information about the data presented on this site, including our sources, please see the About Page.

More Topics to Explore

Demographics

Income

Education

More Maps to Explore

State:
Colorado
Counties:
Alamosa, Baca, Bent, Conejos, Costilla, Crowley, Custer, Huerfano, Kiowa, Las Animas, Mineral, Otero, Prowers, Pueblo, Rio Grande, Saguache
Metro Area:
Pueblo Area
Cities:
Alamosa, La Junta, Lamar, Las Animas, Monte Vista, Pueblo, Rocky Ford, Trinidad, Walsenburg
Towns:
Aguilar, Antonito, Blanca, Bonanza, Boone, Branson, Campo, Center, Cheraw, City of Creede, Cokedale, Crestone, Crowley, Del Norte, Eads, Fowler, Granada, Hartman, Haswell, Holly, Hooper, Kim, La Jara, La Veta, Manassa, Manzanola, Moffat, Olney Springs, Ordway, Pritchett, Romeo, Rye, Saguache, San Luis, Sanford, Sheridan Lake, Silver Cliff, South Fork, Springfield, Starkville, Sugar City, Swink, Two Buttes, Vilas, Walsh, Westcliffe, Wiley
Unincorporated Places:
Alamosa East, Alpine, Avondale, Beulah Valley, Blende, Brandon, Capulin, Colorado City, Conejos, El Moro, Fort Garland, Gerrard, Hasty, Hoehne, Jansen, La Junta Gardens, Lynn, North La Junta, San Acacio, Segundo, Stonewall Gap, Towner, Valdez, Vineland, Weston
Congressional Districts:
CO-3, CO-4
State House Districts:
CO-46, CO-47, CO-60, CO-62, CO-64
Unified School Districts:
Aguilar 6, Alamosa RE-11J, Branson 82, Campo RE-6, Centennial R-1, Center 26-JT, Cheraw 31, Creede District 1, Crowley County RE-1-J, Custer County C-1, Del Norte C-7, Eads RE-1, East Otero R-1, Edison 54-JT, Florence RE-2, Fowler R-4J, Granada RE-1, Gunnison Watershed RE-1J, Hoehne 3, Holly RE-3, Huerfano RE-1, Kim 88, La Veta RE-2, Lamar RE-2, Las Animas RE-1, Manzanola 3J, McClave RE-2, Moffat District 2, Monte Vista C-8, Mountain Valley RE-1, North Conejos RE-1J, Plainview RE-2, Primero 2, Pritchett RE-3, Pueblo 60, Pueblo County 70, Rocky Ford R-2, Sanford 6J, Sangre de Cristo RE-22J, Sargent RE-33J, Sierra Grande R-30, South Conejos RE-10, Springfield RE-4, Swink 33, Trinidad 1, Vilas RE-5, Walsh RE-1, Wiley RE-13-JT
ZIP Codes:
81001, 81003, 81004, 81005, 81006, 81007, 81019, 81020, 81021, 81022, 81023, 81024, 81025, 81027, 81029, 81030, 81033, 81036, 81038, 81039, 81040, 81041, 81043, 81044, 81045, 81047, 81049, 81050, 81052, 81054, 81055, 81057, 81058, 81059, 81062, 81063, 81064, 81067, 81069, 81071, 81073, 81076, 81077, 81081, 81082, 81084, 81087, 81089, 81090, 81091, 81092, 81101, 81120, 81123, 81124, 81125, 81126, 81129, 81130, 81131, 81132, 81133, 81136, 81138, 81140, 81141, 81143, 81144, 81146, 81147, 81148, 81149, 81151, 81152, 81154, 81155, 81230, 81248, 81252, 81253
Neighboring State Senate Districts:
CO-1, CO-2, CO-3, CO-5, CO-6, KS-39, NM-5, NM-6, NM-7, NM-8, OK-27