Marital Status in the Sugar Creek Township, Hancock County, Indiana (Township)

Marital Status#1

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Hancock County and the Sugar Creek Township
Female Male
Hancock County
Sugar Creek Township
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedMarriedSeparated/DivorcedWidowed-19.315864%-22.342821%-19.315864%19%19.315864%7.440335%22.342821%4.857551%26.756198%27%1,2311,554-60.646477%-54.319702%-60.646477%61%60.646477%5.675837%54.319702%4.378278%66.322314%66%3,8653,852-4.149449%-7.446346%-11.299879%-4.265160%-11.595795%12%4.149449%11.299879%4.149449%4%739241-2.772039%-5.669826%-2.801770%-4.970668%-8.441864%8%2.772039%2.801770%2.772039%3%538161
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

Detailed Marital Status#2

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Hancock County and the Sugar Creek Township
Female Male
Hancock County
Sugar Creek Township
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedNow MarriedSeparatedAbsent SpouseWidowedDivorced-19.315864%-22.342821%-19.315864%19%19.315864%7.440335%22.342821%4.857551%26.756198%27%1,2311,554-59.783461%-52.441278%-59.783461%60%59.783461%6.194500%52.441278%4.714836%65.977961%66%3,8103,832-0.396006%-1.926292%-0.892284%-0.945816%-2.322297%2%0.396006%0.892284%0.396006%0%14823-0.344353%-0.518663%-1.541866%-0.336557%-0.863016%1%0.344353%1.541866%0.344353%0%5520-2.772039%-5.669826%-2.801770%-4.970668%-8.441864%8%2.772039%2.801770%2.772039%3%538161-3.753444%-5.520054%-10.407595%-3.319345%-9.273498%9%3.753444%10.407595%3.753444%4%591218
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

The Married by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Hancock County and the Sugar Creek Township
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1719.186%19.2%33.333%33.3%45.263%45.3%82.621%82.6%73.282%73.3%89.444%89.4%77.700%77.7%87.415%87.4%72.850%72.9%81.761%81.8%80.570%80.6%86.413%86.4%83.224%83.2%84.730%84.7%84.289%84.3%74.403%74.4%74.799%74.8%98.567%98.6%47.745%47.7%38.987%39.0%45.509%45.5%35.986%36.0%4.556%4.56%2.065%2.06%5.063%5.06%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of married females in age cohort
M percentage of married males in age cohort

The Divorced1 by Sex and Age#5

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Hancock County and the Sugar Creek Township
Female
Male
0%5%10%15%20%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1712.209%12.2%0.000%0%13.421%13.4%0.000%0%9.542%9.54%4.422%4.42%8.362%8.36%7.934%7.93%14.005%14.0%0.839%0.84%17.647%17.6%12.681%12.7%14.967%15.0%4.283%4.28%9.726%9.73%11.931%11.9%15.891%15.9%0.000%0%21.485%21.5%0.000%0%6.587%6.59%0.000%0%2.398%2.40%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of divorced females in age cohort
M percentage of divorced males in age cohort
1and Separated

The Never Married by Sex and Age#6

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Hancock County and the Sugar Creek Township
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 170.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%3.053%3.05%0.285%0.29%1.045%1.05%3.146%3.15%6.020%6.02%16.562%16.6%0.000%0%0.906%0.91%0.164%0.16%10.987%11.0%5.985%5.99%13.666%13.7%9.310%9.31%1.433%1.43%30.769%30.8%61.013%61.0%47.904%47.9%64.014%64.0%93.046%93.0%97.935%97.9%94.937%94.9%100.000%100%100.000%100%100.000%100%
F percentage of never married females in age cohort
M percentage of never married males in age cohort

The Widowed by Sex and Age#7

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Hancock County and the Sugar Creek Township
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1768.605%68.6%66.667%66.7%41.316%41.3%17.379%17.4%14.122%14.1%5.849%5.85%12.892%12.9%1.505%1.50%7.125%7.13%0.839%0.84%1.783%1.78%0.000%0%1.645%1.64%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of widowed females in age cohort
M percentage of widowed males in age cohort

The Married by Age#8

Percentage of age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the county subdivisions in Hancock County.
Scope: population of Hancock County and the Sugar Creek Township
Sugar Creek Township
Hancock County
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%20%40%60%80%Count85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 17554621,2031,0859839299616818103341802680
Count number of married in age cohort in the Sugar Creek Township

Marital Status by Race#9

Percentage of each ethno-racial group.
Scope: population of Hancock County and the Sugar Creek Township
Sugar Creek Township
Hancock County
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Married
Never Married
100%50%0%50%100%CountAsian2Other2White1Mixed2White HispanicBlack2-0.327869%-0.000000%0.000000%-14.098361%-0.000000%100.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%-0.000000%85.573770%100.000000%100%14-5.590062%-0.000000%0.000000%-28.571429%-0.000000%100.000000%-0.000000%0.000000%-0.000000%65.838509%100.000000%100%46-22.443890%-0.791126%-6.870754%-23.745433%-1.318375%-12.025119%-30.105770%30%63.977986%5.916244%57.318081%5.592993%69.894230%70%11,62911.6k-27.848101%-12.658228%-44.591029%-0.000000%-8.443272%-40.506329%41%45.569620%-0.000000%13.924051%41.820580%5.145119%59.493671%59%79-42.016807%-7.282913%-41.717791%-2.658487%0.000000%-23.824131%-49.299720%49%50.700280%0.000000%-0.000000%31.799591%50.700280%51%357-5.357143%-94.642857%-52.244165%-4.757630%-5.924596%-100.000000%100%0.000000%0.000000%-0.000000%35.906643%1.166966%0.000000%0%56
Count number of people of given race
1non-Hispanic 2including Hispanic

Map of Marital Status by Tract in the Sugar Creek Township

Married Marital Status by Tract#10

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
58.5%60.1%61.7%63.2%64.7%66.3%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Tract#11

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
6.7%7.4%8.1%8.8%9.5%10.2%

Widowed Marital Status by Tract#12

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
4.89%5.34%5.78%6.23%6.67%7.12%

Never Married Marital Status by Tract#13

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
22.08%22.49%22.90%23.31%23.72%24.14%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Block Group in the Sugar Creek Township

Married Marital Status by Block Group#14

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
56.0%59.7%63.4%67.1%70.8%74.5%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Block Group#15

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
3.3%5.2%7.1%8.9%10.7%12.6%

Widowed Marital Status by Block Group#16

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
2.2%3.7%5.3%6.8%8.4%9.9%

Never Married Marital Status by Block Group#17

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
15.7%18.1%20.4%22.7%25.0%27.4%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Marital Status by County Subdivision in the Indianapolis Area

There are 119 county subdivisions in the Indianapolis Area. This section compares the Sugar Creek Township to the 50 most populous county subdivisions in the Indianapolis Area and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Sugar Creek Township. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 4,750.

Married by County Subdivision#18

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of the Sugar Creek Township, selected other county subdivisions in the Indianapolis Area, and entities that contain the Sugar Creek Township
0%20%40%60%Count#Fall CrkZionsvilleBrownMonroeNeedhamGrnMadisonWhite RivClay TownshipWayneSugar CrkS Hancock CoMiddleWashingtonRichlandLincolnBuck CrkLibertyUnionCtrJacksonWashingtonNoblesvilleHancockAdamsDelawareVernonFranklinWashingtonCtrMonroeCtrPleasantGuilfordBrownPipe CrkMidwestLafayetteIndianaEast North CentralIndianapolisFranklinUnited StatesWashingtonFall CrkDecaturPerryLawrenceAddisonBlue RivAndersonWashingtonWarrenWaynePike TownshipGreencastleCtr68.063310%68.063310%68%28,03828.0k166.471572%66.471572%66%12,72012.7k266.344039%66.344039%66%6,032364.801530%64.801530%65%2,710464.662954%64.662954%65%3,367564.590286%64.590286%65%3,484664.480387%64.480387%64%5,063764.418126%64.418126%64%22,51822.5k864.358698%64.358698%64%45,91845.9k963.526651%63.526651%64%3,7901063.352762%63.352762%63%7,7171162.741516%62.741516%63%8,93061.980705%61.980705%62%3,1481261.830117%61.830117%62%17,23717.2k1360.551354%60.551354%61%2,4821459.976706%59.976706%60%14,41914.4k1559.929825%59.929825%60%4,2701659.869228%59.869228%60%2,9301758.876168%58.876168%59%4,4741858.130746%58.130746%58%5,6911957.651533%57.651533%58%5,0032057.355442%57.355442%57%21,58421.6k2157.262119%57.262119%57%24,48724.5k2256.442875%56.442875%56%32,61132.6k56.239601%56.239601%56%2,3662355.807636%55.807636%56%15,20215.2k2453.263925%53.263925%53%5,1162553.204209%53.204209%53%22,25022.3k2653.004808%53.004808%53%2,2052752.901341%52.901341%53%7,9682851.616645%51.616645%52%3,5602950.811277%50.811277%51%10,61610.6k3050.701675%50.701675%51%22,40022.4k3150.615546%50.615546%51%12,58112.6k3250.412603%50.412603%50%5,3763350.259171%50.259171%50%5,0423449.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M49.304447%49.304447%49%2,1623549.300923%49.300923%49%2,603,1052.60M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.313743%48.313743%48%750,826751k48.095731%48.095731%48%8,3603648.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.498380%47.498380%47%6,5983746.033800%46.033800%46%5,6933845.542537%45.542537%46%11,62211.6k3944.710454%44.710454%45%40,04040.0k4043.888029%43.888029%44%41,97142.0k4143.260789%43.260789%43%6,9974242.965500%42.965500%43%1,7564339.322244%39.322244%39%17,80017.8k4439.298759%39.298759%39%44,32944.3k4538.494008%38.494008%38%30,64230.6k4637.374581%37.374581%37%40,26740.3k4737.269180%37.269180%37%23,49323.5k4837.166652%37.166652%37%4,1954927.497098%27.497098%27%32,92232.9k50
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in Indiana

There are 1,012 county subdivisions in Indiana. This section compares the Sugar Creek Township to the 50 most populous county subdivisions in Indiana and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Sugar Creek Township. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 32,697.

Married by County Subdivision#22

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of the Sugar Creek Township, selected other county subdivisions in Indiana, and entities that contain the Sugar Creek Township
0%20%40%60%Count#Fall CrkWhite RivClay TownshipSugar CrkAboiteS Hancock CoWashingtonOhio TownshipSt. JohnWashingtonNoblesvilleHancockCtrDelawareWea TownshipFranklinSt. JosephPleasantColumbusElkhartMidwestIndianaHobartEast North CentralIndianapolisWashingtonUnited StatesClay TownshipPortageCtrPenn TownshipDecaturPerryNew AlbanyLawrenceRoss TownshipCtrConcordJeffersonvilleAdamsWayneKnightNFairfieldAndersonWashingtonWarrenPerryWaynePike TownshipHarrisonWaynePortageCalumetCtrCtrWabashBloomington68.063310%68.063310%68%28,03828.0k164.418126%64.418126%64%22,51822.5k264.358698%64.358698%64%45,91845.9k363.352762%63.352762%63%7,71763.263421%63.263421%63%18,49018.5k462.741516%62.741516%63%8,93061.830117%61.830117%62%17,23717.2k561.279549%61.279549%61%18,89818.9k657.605976%57.605976%58%32,00332.0k757.355442%57.355442%57%21,58421.6k857.262119%57.262119%57%24,48724.5k956.442875%56.442875%56%32,61132.6k56.108836%56.108836%56%18,08518.1k1055.807636%55.807636%56%15,20215.2k1153.307009%53.307009%53%13,50013.5k1253.204209%53.204209%53%22,25022.3k1350.803614%50.803614%51%30,02930.0k1450.701675%50.701675%51%22,40022.4k1550.253354%50.253354%50%19,14119.1k1649.768870%49.768870%50%14,42714.4k1749.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M49.300923%49.300923%49%2,603,1052.60M48.528704%48.528704%49%15,12315.1k1848.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.313743%48.313743%48%750,826751k48.189378%48.189378%48%14,54514.5k1948.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M48.048347%48.048347%48%13,51613.5k2047.894641%47.894641%48%18,34718.3k2147.714632%47.714632%48%17,32917.3k2246.422571%46.422571%46%25,14225.1k2345.542537%45.542537%46%11,62211.6k2444.710454%44.710454%45%40,04040.0k2544.425684%44.425684%44%18,15518.2k2643.888029%43.888029%44%41,97142.0k2743.599898%43.599898%44%17,06517.1k2843.529317%43.529317%44%16,16216.2k2943.300778%43.300778%43%18,26618.3k3042.822856%42.822856%43%21,23221.2k3142.793438%42.793438%43%10,74810.7k3242.395094%42.395094%42%14,10414.1k3341.717080%41.717080%42%23,03223.0k3440.434316%40.434316%40%50,44150.4k3539.502003%39.502003%40%16,95917.0k3639.322244%39.322244%39%17,80017.8k3739.298759%39.298759%39%44,32944.3k3838.494008%38.494008%38%30,64230.6k3937.770221%37.770221%38%17,10517.1k4037.374581%37.374581%37%40,26740.3k4137.269180%37.269180%37%23,49323.5k4235.237891%35.237891%35%14,82014.8k4335.017264%35.017264%35%28,60028.6k4432.111165%32.111165%32%23,05123.1k4531.859886%31.859886%32%25,34925.3k4630.712118%30.712118%31%18,11818.1k4727.497098%27.497098%27%32,92232.9k4825.363188%25.363188%25%14,38614.4k4916.956295%16.956295%17%7,16250
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in the Midwest

There are 19,478 county subdivisions in the Midwest. This section compares the Sugar Creek Township to the 50 most populous county subdivisions in the Midwest and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Sugar Creek Township. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 112,821.

Married by County Subdivision#26

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of the Sugar Creek Township, selected other county subdivisions in the Midwest, and entities that contain the Sugar Creek Township
0%20%40%60%Count#Sugar CrkS Hancock CoOlatheWheelingMiltonHancockDowners GrvLisleSchaumburgPalatineOverland ParkMaineYork TownshipSterling HtsBloomingdaleMidwestIndianaEast North CentralIndianapolisUnited StatesWichitaCedar RapidsWorthSioux FallsLincolnAuroraOmahaTopekaLawrenceWarrenRockfordProvisoCapitalBlue TownshipKansas CityFargoNWashingtonSt. PaulMadisonWayneSpringfieldColumbusGrand RapidsChicagoToledoAkronAnn ArborMinneapolisThorntonKaw TownshipMilwaukeeSt. LouisDaytonCincinnatiCtrClevelandDetroit63.352762%63.352762%63%7,71762.741516%62.741516%63%8,93058.380892%58.380892%58%58,51458.5k157.956243%57.956243%58%72,95373.0k257.271563%57.271563%57%54,54254.5k356.442875%56.442875%56%32,61132.6k56.170501%56.170501%56%67,91867.9k455.549745%55.549745%56%54,17154.2k554.826990%54.826990%55%59,00759.0k654.654332%54.654332%55%50,33550.3k754.645675%54.645675%55%81,04581.0k853.714534%53.714534%54%60,61960.6k953.415502%53.415502%53%54,82354.8k1052.718032%52.718032%53%58,09058.1k1152.421321%52.421321%52%48,17148.2k1249.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M49.300923%49.300923%49%2,603,1052.60M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.313743%48.313743%48%750,826751k48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M46.960737%46.960737%47%142,222142k1346.926723%46.926723%47%49,10649.1k1446.598037%46.598037%47%57,57757.6k1546.121341%46.121341%46%52,49952.5k1645.744744%45.744744%46%100,713101k1744.628467%44.628467%45%50,12050.1k1844.590793%44.590793%45%155,967156k1943.918641%43.918641%44%44,89144.9k2043.888029%43.888029%44%41,97142.0k2143.342243%43.342243%43%47,67347.7k2242.182191%42.182191%42%58,84558.8k2341.858338%41.858338%42%51,24851.2k2441.656465%41.656465%42%39,47239.5k2541.615253%41.615253%42%52,20852.2k2641.257350%41.257350%41%46,87046.9k2740.918685%40.918685%41%39,35639.4k2840.434316%40.434316%40%50,44150.4k2939.298759%39.298759%39%44,32944.3k3038.434697%38.434697%38%89,54989.5k3138.016793%38.016793%38%79,77979.8k3237.374581%37.374581%37%40,26740.3k3336.861011%36.861011%37%51,51451.5k3436.213799%36.213799%36%238,985239k3536.138338%36.138338%36%55,67455.7k3634.991275%34.991275%35%774,654775k3734.263033%34.263033%34%77,25877.3k3834.246812%34.246812%34%55,61155.6k3934.182653%34.182653%34%35,72635.7k4034.058799%34.058799%34%114,098114k4133.122335%33.122335%33%45,05345.1k4232.858158%32.858158%33%47,62147.6k4330.116551%30.116551%30%140,104140k4428.610312%28.610312%29%74,84274.8k4528.095242%28.095242%28%32,24832.2k4627.737366%27.737366%28%66,88266.9k4727.497098%27.497098%27%32,92232.9k4825.309060%25.309060%25%79,70079.7k4922.633004%22.633004%23%122,402122k50
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in the United States

There are 35,600 county subdivisions in the United States. This section compares the Sugar Creek Township to the 50 most populous county subdivisions in the United States and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with the Sugar Creek Township. The least populous of the compared county subdivisions has a population of 547,300.

Married by County Subdivision#30

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of the Sugar Creek Township, selected other county subdivisions in the United States, and entities that contain the Sugar Creek Township
0%20%40%60%Count#Sugar CrkS Hancock CoPlanoSeattle EastNW HarrisHancockNE TarrantSan JoseSalt Lk CityHempsteadOceanside-EscondidoOceanside-Escond…MidwestIndianaEast North CentralIndianapolisUnited StatesAnaheim-Santa Ana-Gdn GrvAnaheim-Santa An…TulsaOntarioE San Gabriel VlySan DiegoFort WorthNE DallasQueensSan Fernando VlyHoustonEl PasoSW DallasTucsonPhoenixSacramentoLas VegasSeattleAlbuquerque1, CharlotteFresnoSan BernardinoBrooklynLong Bch-LakewoodSan FranciscoDenverTampaAustinSan Antonio CntrlOrlandoColumbusMiamiLos AngelesChicagoManhattanBronxAtlantaMilwaukeePhiladelphiaBostonWashingtonBaltimoreDetroit63.352762%63.352762%63%7,71762.741516%62.741516%63%8,93058.202134%58.202134%58%251,641252k157.638027%57.638027%58%274,040274k256.514896%56.514896%57%320,995321k356.442875%56.442875%56%32,61132.6k55.470608%55.470608%55%245,818246k453.145912%53.145912%53%753,465753k551.138382%51.138382%51%386,329386k650.950813%50.950813%51%320,555321k750.269233%50.269233%50%265,786266k849.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M49.300923%49.300923%49%2,603,1052.60M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.313743%48.313743%48%750,826751k48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.984846%47.984846%48%650,127650k947.622706%47.622706%48%221,908222k1047.598208%47.598208%48%244,720245k1146.424729%46.424729%46%362,066362k1245.848486%45.848486%46%891,599892k1345.482613%45.482613%45%296,986297k1445.455274%45.455274%45%550,082550k1545.377673%45.377673%45%868,275868k1645.160186%45.160186%45%683,144683k1744.927436%44.927436%45%1,148,7951.15M1844.541106%44.541106%45%191,435191k1944.216416%44.216416%44%323,524324k2044.045122%44.045122%44%316,266316k2143.656525%43.656525%44%1,102,9451.10M2243.293835%43.293835%43%387,327387k2343.059598%43.059598%43%644,442644k2442.998477%42.998477%43%380,073380k2542.927370%42.927370%43%222,587223k2642.506557%42.506557%43%272,436272k2742.409166%42.409166%42%223,593224k2842.178253%42.178253%42%269,042269k2940.197400%40.197400%40%840,930841k3039.817865%39.817865%40%184,950185k3139.306154%39.306154%39%295,734296k3239.068367%39.068367%39%212,453212k3338.872581%38.872581%39%212,275212k3438.860704%38.860704%39%271,470271k3537.253059%37.253059%37%203,734204k3636.755584%36.755584%37%174,510175k3736.213799%36.213799%36%238,985239k3835.677552%35.677552%36%287,144287k3935.326059%35.326059%35%750,299750k4034.991275%34.991275%35%774,654775k4133.355074%33.355074%33%477,149477k4231.190048%31.190048%31%352,504353k4330.518762%30.518762%31%147,022147k4430.116551%30.116551%30%140,104140k4529.523746%29.523746%30%374,491374k4629.130336%29.130336%29%165,206165k4728.183356%28.183356%28%157,791158k4826.884245%26.884245%27%136,972137k4922.633004%22.633004%23%122,402122k50
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 50 by percentage of this marital status

Definitions

This page reports on the marital status of the residents of the Sugar Creek Township aged 15 and older. The following definitions are used in this page:

  • Never Married: a person over the age of 15 that has never been married
  • Married: married and not separated at the time of the survey, including cases where one spouse is absent for reasons other than a separation
  • Separated: including legal and de-facto separations for reasons of marital discord
  • Divorced: and not remarried at the time of the survey
  • Widowed: and not remarried at the time of the survey

These definition were taken directly from the US Census Bureau, and reflect the marital status at the time of the survey.

For additional information about the data presented on this site, including our sources, please see the About Page.

More Topics to Explore

Demographics

Income

Education

More Maps to Explore

State:
Indiana
County:
Hancock
Metro Area:
Indianapolis Area
Towns:
Cumberland, New Palestine, Spring Lake
ZIP Codes:
46140, 46163, 46229, 46239
Unified School District:
Southern Hancock County
Congressional District:
IN-6
State Senate District:
IN-28
State House Districts:
IN-53, IN-57
Neighboring Townships:
Brandywine, Buck Creek, Center, Franklin, Moral, Van Buren, Warren
Nearby Townships:
Blue River, Brandywine, Center, Clark, Green, Hanover, Lawrence, Marion, Sugar Creek, Vernon