Marital Status in State House District 78, Michigan (State House District)

Marital Status#1

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 78
Female Male
Michigan
State House District 78
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
50%0%50%FMNever MarriedMarriedSeparated/DivorcedWidowed-24.200635%-29.997089%-24.200635%24%24.200635%6.018873%29.997089%6.060515%30.219508%30%9,14310,98611.0k-51.860773%-46.631047%-51.860773%52%51.860773%3.505899%46.631047%2.778150%55.366672%55%19,59319.6k20,12820.1k-11.723607%-2.585552%-11.783011%-2.359012%-14.309158%14%11.723607%11.783011%11.723607%12%5,4064,262-2.690213%-6.939221%-2.750188%-6.479654%-9.629434%10%2.690213%2.750188%2.690213%3%3,638978
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

Detailed Marital Status#2

Percentage of population aged 15 and older.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 78
Female Male
Michigan
State House District 78
Shaded bar tips show excess over facing bar.
40%20%0%20%40%FMNever MarriedNow MarriedSeparatedAbsent SpouseWidowedDivorced-24.200635%-29.997089%-24.200635%24%24.200635%6.018873%29.997089%6.060515%30.219508%30%9,14310,98611.0k-49.322393%-44.935835%-49.322393%49%49.322393%2.471082%44.935835%2.531926%51.793475%52%18,63418.6k18,82918.8k-1.056280%-0.214234%-1.206320%-0.339268%-1.270513%1%1.056280%1.206320%1.056280%1%480384-2.538380%-1.695212%-2.538380%3%2.538380%1.034817%1.695212%0.246224%3.573197%4%9591,299-2.690213%-6.939221%-2.750188%-6.479654%-9.629434%10%2.690213%2.750188%2.690213%3%3,638978-10.667327%-2.371318%-10.576690%-2.019743%-13.038645%13%10.667327%10.576690%10.667327%11%4,9263,878
F number of females of given marital status
M number of males of given marital status

The Married by Sex and Age#4

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 78
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1713.301%13.3%55.014%55.0%48.400%48.4%76.437%76.4%61.713%61.7%78.214%78.2%68.005%68.0%73.447%73.4%68.932%68.9%68.696%68.7%65.545%65.5%67.990%68.0%66.395%66.4%61.934%61.9%64.160%64.2%67.018%67.0%58.537%58.5%65.674%65.7%62.495%62.5%58.143%58.1%45.044%45.0%30.704%30.7%11.954%12.0%6.415%6.41%0.362%0.36%2.426%2.43%0.000%0%0.135%0.13%
F percentage of married females in age cohort
M percentage of married males in age cohort

The Divorced1 by Sex and Age#5

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 78
Female
Male
0%5%10%15%20%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 179.165%9.16%11.142%11.1%8.944%8.94%8.101%8.10%17.989%18.0%13.451%13.5%20.178%20.2%16.252%16.3%19.381%19.4%18.141%18.1%22.909%22.9%19.569%19.6%19.762%19.8%23.221%23.2%22.047%22.0%16.092%16.1%15.331%15.3%7.484%7.48%13.175%13.2%7.326%7.33%3.366%3.37%3.963%3.96%1.324%1.32%1.207%1.21%0.000%0%0.554%0.55%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of divorced females in age cohort
M percentage of divorced males in age cohort
1and Separated

The Never Married by Sex and Age#6

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 78
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%80%100%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 171.622%1.62%0.000%0%2.546%2.55%1.307%1.31%3.815%3.82%3.374%3.37%5.102%5.10%7.325%7.33%6.372%6.37%12.354%12.4%8.879%8.88%11.597%11.6%9.626%9.63%14.424%14.4%12.876%12.9%16.636%16.6%25.281%25.3%26.058%26.1%24.155%24.2%34.531%34.5%51.406%51.4%65.333%65.3%86.722%86.7%92.379%92.4%99.638%99.6%97.020%97.0%100.000%100%99.865%99.9%
F percentage of never married females in age cohort
M percentage of never married males in age cohort

The Widowed by Sex and Age#7

Percentage of age and sex cohort.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 78
Female
Male
0%20%40%60%FM85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 1775.912%75.9%33.844%33.8%40.110%40.1%14.155%14.2%16.482%16.5%4.961%4.96%6.715%6.71%2.976%2.98%5.315%5.31%0.810%0.81%2.667%2.67%0.844%0.84%4.218%4.22%0.420%0.42%0.917%0.92%0.254%0.25%0.852%0.85%0.784%0.78%0.176%0.18%0.000%0%0.184%0.18%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%0.000%0%
F percentage of widowed females in age cohort
M percentage of widowed males in age cohort

The Married by Age#8

Percentage of age cohort. Gray areas represent percentile bands from the lower state legislative districts in Michigan.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 78
State House District 78
Michigan
Percentile:
0th - 100th
10th - 90th
20th - 80th
30th - 70th
40th - 60th
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%Count85+75 - 8465 - 7460 - 6455 - 5950 - 5445 - 4940 - 4435 - 3930 - 3425 - 2920 - 2418 - 1915 - 175593,1626,7824,3124,8984,3383,8673,5943,1882,6691,775536392
Count number of married in age cohort in State House District 78

Marital Status by Race#9

Percentage of each ethno-racial group.
Scope: population of Michigan and State House District 78
State House District 78
Michigan
Divorced
Widowed
Separated
Married
Never Married
60%40%20%0%20%40%60%CountWhite1Other2Asian2White HispanicMixed2Black2-23.871713%-1.108103%-12.618132%-28.404956%-1.009921%-11.788890%-37.597948%38%55.818334%6.583717%52.395394%6.400839%62.402052%62%63,17163.2k-36.086310%-11.011905%-39.832515%-2.679443%-11.428023%-47.098214%47%50.818452%-0.000000%2.083333%42.539952%3.520068%52.901786%53%1,344-44.435352%-4.009820%-31.533651%-0.545272%-3.702842%-48.445172%48%48.608838%-0.000000%2.945990%60.836114%3.382120%51.554828%52%1,222-44.919121%-1.617586%-7.590212%-43.045654%-2.025080%-9.506242%-54.126918%54%43.882207%1.990875%42.359085%3.063938%45.873082%46%2,411-48.174660%-0.214746%-7.516106%-54.604964%-1.759718%-10.417404%-55.905512%56%38.654259%5.440229%30.020725%3.197190%44.094488%44%1,397-49.357158%-2.658531%-7.583351%-53.580862%-3.364937%-12.843388%-59.599041%60%34.539115%5.861844%24.149425%6.061389%40.400959%40%4,589
Count number of people of given race
1non-Hispanic 2including Hispanic

Map of Marital Status by County in State House District 78

Married Marital Status by County#10

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
50.3%51.3%52.3%53.2%54.2%55.2%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County#11

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
13.56%13.63%13.69%13.76%13.82%13.89%

Widowed Marital Status by County#12

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
6.12%6.21%6.30%6.39%6.48%6.57%

Never Married Marital Status by County#13

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
24.8%25.8%26.7%27.6%28.6%29.6%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by County Subdivision in State House District 78

Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#14

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
40%46%52%57%63%69%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by County Subdivision#15

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
6.0%8.9%11.7%14.6%17.5%20.4%

Widowed Marital Status by County Subdivision#16

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
3.4%5.3%7.1%8.9%10.7%12.6%

Never Married Marital Status by County Subdivision#17

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
19.0%23.5%28.0%32.4%36.9%41.4%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Tract in State House District 78

Married Marital Status by Tract#18

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
30%38%45%52%59%66%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Tract#19

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
4.2%8.3%12.4%16.5%20.7%24.8%

Widowed Marital Status by Tract#20

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
3.4%5.1%6.8%8.4%10.0%11.7%

Never Married Marital Status by Tract#21

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
15%22%28%34%39%46%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Map of Marital Status by Block Group in State House District 78

Married Marital Status by Block Group#22

Married as a percentage of the population (%):
19%32%45%58%71%84%

Separated/Divorced Marital Status by Block Group#23

Separated/Divorced as a percentage of the population (%):
0%6%12%19%25%32%

Widowed Marital Status by Block Group#24

Widowed as a percentage of the population (%):
0.0%4.1%8.1%12.2%16.2%20.3%

Never Married Marital Status by Block Group#25

Never Married as a percentage of the population (%):
0%15%31%46%62%78%
Road Data ©OpenStreetMap

Loading...

Failed to load :-(

Marital Status by Place in State House District 78

There are 13 places in State House District 78. This section compares all 13 of those to each other, State House District 78, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 78.

Married by Place#26

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State House District 78, selected places in State House District 78, and entities that contain State House District 78
0%20%40%60%Count#Grand BeachMichianaShorewood-Tower Hls-HarbertShorewood-Tower …MI-78Three OaksMidwestBerrien SpgsEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganBarodaEau ClaireBuchananNew BuffaloNew TroyNilesGalienEdwardsburg73.600000%73.600000%74%184172.625698%72.625698%73%130268.340611%68.340611%68%939353.580004%53.580004%54%39,72139.7k51.826678%51.826678%52%610449.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M49.165121%49.165121%49%530548.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M46.879536%46.879536%47%323645.154185%45.154185%45%205744.752018%44.752018%45%1,552842.428198%42.428198%42%650942.393162%42.393162%42%2481040.448792%40.448792%40%3,5151136.962751%36.962751%37%1291235.908142%35.908142%36%34413
Count number of this marital status
# rank of place out of 13 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Metro Area in State House District 78

There are 2 metro areas that are fully or partially contained within State House District 78 (0 fully and 2 partially). This section compares all 2 of those to each other, State House District 78, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 78.

Married by Metro Area#30

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State House District 78, selected metro areas in State House District 78, and entities that contain State House District 78
0%10%20%30%40%50%Count#MI-78Niles AreaMidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganSouth Bend53.580004%53.580004%54%39,72139.7k50.340992%50.340992%50%63,62963.6k149.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M47.512839%47.512839%48%122,213122k2
Count number of this marital status
# rank of metro area out of 2 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County in State House District 78

There are 2 counties that are fully or partially contained within State House District 78 (0 fully and 2 partially). This section compares all 2 of those to each other, State House District 78, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 78.

Married by County#34

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State House District 78, selected counties in State House District 78, and entities that contain State House District 78
0%10%20%30%40%50%Count#CassMI-78BerrienMidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichigan55.160350%55.160350%55%23,65023.7k153.580004%53.580004%54%39,72139.7k50.340992%50.340992%50%63,62963.6k249.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county out of 2 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by County Subdivision in State House District 78

There are 22 county subdivisions that are fully or partially contained within State House District 78 (21 fully and 1 partially). This section compares all 22 of those to each other, State House District 78, and other entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 78.

Married by County Subdivision#38

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State House District 78, selected county subdivisions in State House District 78, and entities that contain State House District 78
0%20%40%60%Count#MiltonBertrandChikamingBuchananSilver CrkOntwaWeesawHowardBerrienBarodaNew BuffaloThree OaksPipestoneMI-78PokagonGalienSodusNilesMidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganOronokoBuchananNew BuffaloNiles68.676089%68.676089%69%2,381165.659220%65.659220%66%1,499265.270083%65.270083%65%1,885363.041106%63.041106%63%1,733460.856611%60.856611%61%1,634559.962193%59.962193%60%3,172658.754864%58.754864%59%906757.957430%57.957430%58%2,968856.862270%56.862270%57%2,345955.962898%55.962898%56%1,2671055.805065%55.805065%56%1,1681155.410166%55.410166%55%1,1011253.600406%53.600406%54%1,0571353.580004%53.580004%54%39,72139.7k53.429603%53.429603%53%1,0361453.006873%53.006873%53%6171551.407507%51.407507%51%7671650.595921%50.595921%51%5,7311749.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M47.186093%47.186093%47%3,7731844.752018%44.752018%45%1,5521942.428198%42.428198%42%6502040.448792%40.448792%40%3,51521
Count number of this marital status
# rank of county subdivision out of 21 by percentage of this marital status

Marital Status by Lower State Legislative District in Michigan

There are 110 lower state legislative districts in Michigan. This section compares State House District 78 to all of the lower state legislative districts in Michigan and to those entities that contain or substantially overlap with State House District 78.

Married by Lower State Legislative District#42

Percentage of population.
Scope: population of State House District 78, selected other lower state legislative districts in Michigan, and entities that contain State House District 78
0%20%40%60%Count#MI-89MI-73MI-33MI-40MI-52MI-45MI-42MI-87MI-47MI-46MI-41MI-44MI-51MI-36MI-38MI-21MI-80MI-39MI-20MI-86MI-105MI-98MI-84MI-82MI-56MI-106MI-93MI-32MI-81MI-85MI-101MI-61MI-108MI-78MI-59MI-104MI-79MidwestEast North CentralUnited StatesMichiganMI-96MI-35MI-76MI-12MI-29MI-5MI-34MI-8MI-6MI-3MI-762.284112%62.284112%62%44,86244.9k162.135786%62.135786%62%48,70748.7k262.087315%62.087315%62%44,57044.6k362.082761%62.082761%62%47,48447.5k461.205201%61.205201%61%44,48744.5k559.463038%59.463038%59%44,00844.0k659.169149%59.169149%59%46,47546.5k759.015101%59.015101%59%44,90444.9k858.944838%58.944838%59%43,16043.2k958.776671%58.776671%59%43,82843.8k1058.415904%58.415904%58%46,10346.1k1158.191422%58.191422%58%45,27745.3k1257.855447%57.855447%58%43,86643.9k1357.794440%57.794440%58%42,70242.7k1457.782104%57.782104%58%44,82144.8k1557.731284%57.731284%58%41,47341.5k1657.729343%57.729343%58%43,22643.2k1757.543661%57.543661%58%44,71244.7k1857.439819%57.439819%57%42,66442.7k1956.907107%56.907107%57%43,96744.0k2056.714689%56.714689%57%43,57943.6k2156.617730%56.617730%57%39,95440.0k2256.066479%56.066479%56%40,21240.2k2355.905068%55.905068%56%40,68140.7k2455.859985%55.859985%56%39,36939.4k2555.776998%55.776998%56%44,33144.3k2655.751544%55.751544%56%43,52343.5k2755.706465%55.706465%56%39,78539.8k2855.623693%55.623693%56%38,82238.8k2955.405861%55.405861%55%41,08441.1k3054.866194%54.866194%55%42,95243.0k3253.973459%53.973459%54%42,46242.5k3853.884291%53.884291%54%38,80138.8k3953.580004%53.580004%54%39,72139.7k4153.038474%53.038474%53%39,53739.5k4751.183180%51.183180%51%38,41438.4k5549.492190%49.492190%49%34,06334.1k6349.375331%49.375331%49%26,998,09027.0M48.446718%48.446718%48%18,331,77818.3M48.062966%48.062966%48%123,770,934124M47.983566%47.983566%48%3,880,2763.88M47.404342%47.404342%47%33,33933.3k7142.589378%42.589378%43%32,62932.6k7842.089575%42.089575%42%33,60633.6k8139.989628%39.989628%40%29,30229.3k8632.937125%32.937125%33%23,52623.5k9428.978939%28.978939%29%17,39217.4k10224.832552%24.832552%25%15,83115.8k10623.867109%23.867109%24%16,24316.2k10723.230473%23.230473%23%17,24717.2k10820.592463%20.592463%21%13,18013.2k10919.742496%19.742496%20%13,50913.5k110
Count number of this marital status
# rank of lower state legislative district out of 110 by percentage of this marital status

Definitions

This page reports on the marital status of the residents of State House District 78 aged 15 and older. The following definitions are used in this page:

  • Never Married: a person over the age of 15 that has never been married
  • Married: married and not separated at the time of the survey, including cases where one spouse is absent for reasons other than a separation
  • Separated: including legal and de-facto separations for reasons of marital discord
  • Divorced: and not remarried at the time of the survey
  • Widowed: and not remarried at the time of the survey

These definition were taken directly from the US Census Bureau, and reflect the marital status at the time of the survey.

For additional information about the data presented on this site, including our sources, please see the About Page.

More Topics to Explore

Demographics

Income

Education

More Maps to Explore

State:
Michigan
Counties:
Berrien, Cass
Metro Areas:
Niles Area, South Bend Area
Charter Township:
Oronoko
Cities:
Buchanan, New Buffalo, Niles
Townships:
Baroda, Berrien, Bertrand, Buchanan, Chikaming, Galien, Howard, Milton, New Buffalo, Niles, Ontwa, Pipestone, Pokagon, Silver Creek, Sodus, Three Oaks, Weesaw
Unincorporated Places:
New Troy, Shorewood-Tower Hills-Harbert
Villages:
Baroda, Berrien Springs, Eau Claire, Edwardsburg, Galien, Grand Beach, Michiana, Three Oaks
Congressional District:
MI-6
State Senate District:
MI-21
Unified School Districts:
Benton Harbor, Berrien Springs, Brandywine, Bridgman, Buchanan, Cassopolis, Dowagiac Union, Eau Claire, Edwardsburg, Galien Township, Lakeshore, New Buffalo, Niles, River Valley
Elementary School District:
Sodus Township 5
ZIP Codes:
49022, 49031, 49047, 49101, 49102, 49103, 49104, 49107, 49111, 49112, 49113, 49115, 49116, 49117, 49119, 49120, 49125, 49126, 49127, 49128, 49129
Neighboring State House Districts:
IN-5, IN-8, IN-9, IN-48, MI-59, MI-66, MI-79
Nearby State House Districts:
IN-4, IN-6, IN-7, IN-10, IN-17, IN-20, IN-21, IN-22, IN-49, MI-61